Posted on 04/03/2006 8:13:43 AM PDT by doug from upland
ROHRBACHER DEMANDING NEW PROBE OF OKC
Jayna Davis and I had an interesting phone conversation this morning. She is still waiting for a plane ticket to D.C. and an invitation to testify about the OKC bombing. Neither has been forthcoming.
Is it good news that Rep. Dana Rohrbacher (R-CA) is demanding a new probe of the OKC bombing? Maybe. But is it going to really get to the truth about the Middle Eastern connection to OKC? Maybe not.
Last year, David Schippers, famous for prosecuting both the Chicago mob and William Jefferson Blythe Clinton, flew to OKC to meet Jayna and her witnesses. Dave spent 12 hours grilling 14 of them on camera.
When he was finished, he told Jayna that, with just three of them, he would get a federal indictment of Hussain al-Hussaini in one day. FBI agent Dan Vogel told her he could do the same -- with one of her witnesses. That is how credible they were.
So why, Congressman Rohrbacher, did you tell Jayna that the committee has no budget to fly her to Washington, D.C.? What is the problem? Are we finally going to get the truth or is this grandstanding?
Andreas Carl Strassmeier has six witnesses saying that he was building a fence at the time of the bombing. He couldn't have been with McVeigh. Of 1100 fingerprints tied to the crime scene, none are Strassmeier's. Not one of 30,000 witnesses ties Strassmeier to the crime.
Here is a question for you, Congressman. Well, actually seven questions. Ten months ago, Jayna gave these to you in writing and still is waiting for the answers.
1. Why has the Justice Department/FBI not issued an official on-the-record statement exonerating Hussain Al-Hussaini of complicity in the Oklahoma City bombing? Has the DOJ provided Congress with Hussain Al-Hussainis whereabouts for the critical hours of the morning of April 19, 1995?
2. Why did the FBI never question Hussain Al-Hussaini about the bombing?
3. Why did the FBI previously suspect Al-Hussainis employer of ties to the Palestinian Liberation Organization?
4. Why were the original motel registration logs where witnesses testified McVeigh checked in with Al-Hussainis Iraqi cohort the evening of April 18, 1995, never returned to the establishments owner?
5. Whatever happened to the brown Chevrolet pickup that was seen carrying Middle Eastern suspects from the bomb site? The Oklahoma City police found fingerprints inside the recovered truck. Why were these prints not compared to the immigration files of the three Middle Eastern nationals whom witnesses observed in that getaway vehicle before, during, and after the bombing?
6. Why did the Bureau rebuff my efforts to surrender the witness statements and supporting evidence in September 1997? Why did the FBI withhold from the defense teams the twenty-two witness affidavits that I delivered to FBI Special Agent Dan Vogel in January 1999?
7. Why were the prior warnings issued by the Congressional Task Force on Terrorism and Unconventional Warfare that predicted an Islamic attack in the heart of the U.S. disregarded as an indicator of foreign participation?
Congressman Rohrbacher needs to bring Jayna and Schippers to meet with the committee in closed session. The committee needs to see the on camera interviews of 14 eye witnesses. It needs to be done in closed session to protect the witnesses. They stepped forward as patriots facing great risk.
The real story of OKC should have been told long ago. Let's finally get it told now. Bill Clinton did not want to deal with Middle East terror on our soil. He wanted this to be domestic terror. That is what he got. Who are those deep inside the FBI who are responsible for continuing the coverup?
The truth about OKC will forever end any remaining legacy of the impeached William Jefferson Blythe Clinton. Had he dealt with OKC, 9-11 could have been prevented. He ignored Middle East terror, created the vast right wing conspiracy, and his Kool-Aid drinkers dug in their heels. He would be held accountable for nothing. They stood with him no matter what because they had to fight the dreaded right wing. That is how Clinton divided America as never before.
If anyone would like to join me in calling the congressman, he is at (202) 225-2415.
You are correct. The ME connection is evident in the following:
*The secret VINs removed from the Ryder truck, std ME op precedure (except for one on rear axle so McVeigh could take the fall)
*Truck was spotted at the weakest pt in the structure of the Murrah bldg (another std ME op procedure)
*Homemade TNT used (std ME receipe)
*McViegh seen with ME types before bombing
*McViegh and Nichols didn't have a thimble full of brains between them
If you look at photos of other ME bombings, they look remarkably like the Murrah bldg after the bombing. The OKC bombing literally stinks of falafal and Mocha java.
Look, the FBI and the CIA have been bungling things for years. Why, because the terrorists have been doing this stuff for years, are more ruthless, and are just plain smarter than most of these G-men, many of whom are just college educated smarta$$es.
I don't know if you noticed, but upthread I posted that after the bombing, the government invited to Israeli bomb experts to examine the debris. They concluded without doubt that it was the work of ME terrorists.
OH MY GOODNESS! My eyes are literally bugging out of my head.**picking up jaw from floor** Is THAT damning or what??
I am sure the media will jump right on these eye-poppers, too, right? /sarc
Eyespysomething - could you please use your ping list for post #230?
Freeper StillProud2BeFree provided an analysis of Document # 2002-801138.
I'm forgetting his name right now, but the Congress had it's own terrorism expert and before the OKC blast, he warned them that a terrorist attack would occur in the heartland of America and Iraq or other ME terrorists would use Lily White's to cover up their involvement.
At this point, I can't even blame Clinton for this because it's within the power of our side to expose the cover-up, and they, for pretty obvious reasons, I think, don't want to do so.
If you haven't read Jayna's book, I'm serious - it's one of the most important reads you can read. I've lent the book to some liberals and they came away not only convinced in Iraq's involvement in OKC, but being okay with the current war in Iraq after being outspoken against it!!!
I never knew that! John Kerry twice on national television referred to Flight 800 as a terrorist attack and so did George Stephanapolous.
Just to keep the record straight, ANFO is only about seven (7) percent fuel oil. The oil's primary function is to keep the primary explosive (ammonium nitrate) from absorbing moisture.
Oil is not required for detonation -- witness the SS Grandcamp, which exploded while being loaded with fresh ammonium nitrate at the Texas City Monsanto dock in 1947.
That would be Yousef Bodansky
I am a PROPONENT of the concept that someone (middleeasterners) were involved in OKC besides McVeigh. My thought here was that SOMEONE ON FR, if anywhere, could explain what THEY THOUGHT or SUSPECTED had happened in a short paragraph.
Something like: "Saddam, motivated by XYZ, wanted to strike the US, so he linked up with McVeigh and provided him with ABC, etc."
Instead TXnMA complain that -I- use bad logic (bad logic in a question, forcryingoutlioud!!!,) Peach scolds me for not reading "all the links," and DFU, in an honest response to my request for "a clear, concise, convincing, bite-size argument as to what "really" happened"....sends me 2,199 words (counted them in word) from a continuously updated blog (update I, Update II, etc, link, link, link.)
I want to have an argument that can be spread easily and simply to grandparents and friends who are not "FR-quality."
But if I can't get anything like that here, it seems clear that it doesn't exist.
DFU, I thank you for your post, of course, but I'm going to try to summarize that link and see if you think I've distilled it correctly.
The article above quite clearly says that (1) Schippers flew to OKC to interview Jayna's sources, and then (2) that Rohrbacher can't afford to get Jayna to washington?
Schippers (or you, or JimRob, or ME or ANYONE) involved in this and totally behind it is able to spend money to check out the sources, but then nobody can afford $400 of their own money round trip to send Jayna to Washington to see the committee?
Sounds like to me that Schippers went, saw, and either got less interested, or was unable to persuade anyone else to be interested.
Meanwhile, I tried to get someone here to give me a synopsis of this thing, and all I've gotten is people telling me I haven't "read the links." Maybe Rohrbacher got the same treatment I have?
I'm beginning to think there is a simple theory, story, or anything that isn't book-sized and $19.95.
Uh? So anytime there's no proof of something, then it must've been covered up?
Ok, so what was the motivation for the coverup and how did everyone get on board?
I started believing this stuff back when Alex Jones was the only person covering it. Now that he's turned into a leftist lunatic, I'm starting to wonder who's really still walking the line here.
When you summarize it, share the summary with us.
That's his name; thank you.
So you're telling us it has to be simple or you don't believe it? Or can't follow it?
I don't get what you don't get.
Did you see what I said about Iraqi Republican Guards upthread? You do know that some Iraqi's want to destroy America, right? And that they brag about using proxies?
I didn't realize that you wanted a summary for distribution. Some people here probably thought you were just being lazy and didn't want to read the info. :) Doing a summary will be helpful for others who don't have the time for the massive amount of info in this case.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.