[sam_paine]

The "underlying plot of OKC is not crystal clear to begin with", because there has been a complex -- and largely successful -- coverup.

Uh? So anytime there's no proof of something, then it must've been covered up?

Ok, so what was the motivation for the coverup and how did everyone get on board?

I started believing this stuff back when Alex Jones was the only person covering it. Now that he's turned into a leftist lunatic, I'm starting to wonder who's really still walking the line here.

[TXnMA]

Sam, you want evidence of "coverup"? How's this for a (literal) "cover-up":

The FBI covered up the crater from the truck bomb with eight sheets of plywood (a 16-foot square) to -- according to FBI's OKC SAIC, Danny Defenbaugh --"protect evidence that was water-soluble".

Where's the coverup?

1. There is a photo of the crater (made immediately after the explosion and before it was covered) that shows it was disappointingly small -- and was full to the brim with muddy water from a ruptured A/C chiller.

2. The FBI later claimed the crater (that they covered with a 16-foot square) was thirty-two (32) feet in diameter.

3. The FBI refused to uncover the crater to allow Mcveigh's defense to examine it.

How's that for starters on a literal "cover-up"?