Skip to comments.
Breaking - Supreme Court Upholds "Colleges who accept Federal Funds must allow Military Recruiters"
FoxNews ^
| 03/06/2006
| Leofl
Posted on 03/06/2006 7:12:47 AM PST by Leofl
Just Breaking!!!! Supreme Court Upholds "Colleges who accept Federal Funds must allow Military Recruiters"
(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...
TOPICS: Breaking News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: antiamericanism; antimilitary; antiwar; campuscommies; codepink; colleges; culturewar; federalfunds; ginsburgsnores; hippies; homosexualagenda; johnroberts; military; militaryrecruiters; militaryrecruiting; publicschools; recruiters; recruiting; recruitment; roberts; robertscourt; rotc; ruling; scotus; solomonamendment; supremecourt; taxdollarsatwork; unamerican; universities; youpayforthis
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-80, 81-100, 101-120 ... 321-340 next last
To: Leofl
Justices rejected a free-speech challenge from law school professors who claimed they should not be forced to associate with military recruiters or promote their campus appearances. Another way to look at this is that these kids are being taught by law professors who just got the legal equivalant of a smack across the face with a unanimous decision.
Maybe the kids will start to think the quality of their professors isn't so hot after all.
81
posted on
03/06/2006 7:36:24 AM PST
by
VeniVidiVici
(What? Me worry?)
To: Ma3lst0rm; Chieftain
Hey...you don't want my money? Ok, then go to H....!
Let's just see how much Soros will cough up to keep these liberal colleges afloat!
82
posted on
03/06/2006 7:37:36 AM PST
by
Recovering Ex-hippie
(Google would sell out America to the highest bidder!)
To: Leofl
A unanimous decision, I see.
To: Leofl; USF; Justanobody; Fred Nerks; Former Dodger; Cornpone; bayouranger; Dark Skies; ...
GREAT NEWS PING!
Chief Justice John Roberts wrote the decision, which was unanimous.
Unanimous? Wake me up...I must be dreaming!
What a way to start the week!!!!
GOD BLESS OUR TROOPS!
84
posted on
03/06/2006 7:38:54 AM PST
by
jan in Colorado
(Beware of the ENEMEDIA!!! What treason have they perpetrated today?)
To: KavMan
When the shock wears off, there will be copious amounts of teeth-nashing.
85
posted on
03/06/2006 7:39:21 AM PST
by
sarasota
To: pissant
Notice the Donner Party posters are never satisfied.
Always whining about something.
86
posted on
03/06/2006 7:39:39 AM PST
by
OldFriend
(HELL IS TOO GOOD FOR OUR MAINSTREAM MEDIA)
To: commish
Not really. The universities can still oppose government policies, and surely will.
To: Leofl
Just Breaking!!!! Supreme Court Upholds "Colleges who accept Federal Funds must allow Military Recruiters"Damned tootin'.
88
posted on
03/06/2006 7:40:06 AM PST
by
Lazamataz
(We beat the Soviet Union, then we became them.)
To: rs79bm
89
posted on
03/06/2006 7:40:34 AM PST
by
GeneD
To: Pyro7480
Roberts wrote the decision, and my guess it was 8-0. I understand it was unanimous. Roberts is such a mental giant compared to the others that anyone willing to dissent would have to publish an opinion that convincingly rebutted his - a tough job for the best of them, and I think that Ginsberg is not up to it. Watch for more 8-0 decisions on major issues in the upcoming future.
To: All
From the article:
Roberts filed the only opinion, which was joined by every justice but Samuel Alito. Alito did not participate because he was not on the bench when the case was argued.
Further:
Roberts, writing his third decision since joining the court, said there are other less drastic options to protest the policy.
"A military recruiter's mere presence on campus does not violate a law school's right to associate, regardless of how repugnant the law school considers the recruiter's message," he wrote.
91
posted on
03/06/2006 7:40:46 AM PST
by
Old Sarge
(Fobbit = REMF ... how do you like me now?)
To: Leofl
"Supreme Court Upholds "Colleges who accept Federal Funds must allow Military Recruiters"
That this had to go to the SC is disgraceful. I'm glad the correct outcome occurred though.
92
posted on
03/06/2006 7:41:07 AM PST
by
CarolinaGuitarman
("There is grandeur in this view of life...")
To: Leofl
I'm wondering what is meant by "federal funds" Are these direct operating grants supplied by the Feds? Would R&D grants from the NSF or NIH be included? If that is the case, these universities would lose their most prominent research departments if they decide to decline federal funds. What about students on scholarship or on financial aid from the government? Would they be eligeable to continue their studies or would the Feds tell them that they can have their scholarships, but here is a list of universities you can attend. SOrry if your current school is no longer eligeable and you can't use your federally funded finacial aid to atttend there anymore.
My ramblings here just go to show how this decision has far reaching implications for campuses and students with many, many loose ends still to be ties.
93
posted on
03/06/2006 7:42:07 AM PST
by
doc30
(Democrats are to morals what and Etch-A-Sketch is to Art.)
To: Leofl
BINGO... GOOD NEWS
94
posted on
03/06/2006 7:42:36 AM PST
by
pointsal
To: finnman69
Brokeback Mountain loses and ROTC wins at SCOTUS. This has nothing to do with ROTC.
95
posted on
03/06/2006 7:43:17 AM PST
by
HoustonCurmudgeon
(Justice and "The Law" are not always the same thing.)
To: Leofl
I can't imagine they would rule any other way.
What the hell is wrong with these people? What could possibly be wrong with allowing yet another career option be available to students?
Not to mention the hypocrisy of taking federal money available to them due to a military who protects the country yet denying that same military access to the campi taxpayers help keep alive.
96
posted on
03/06/2006 7:43:33 AM PST
by
Fishtalk
To: onyx
They're crying louder at Berkeley.
97
posted on
03/06/2006 7:43:39 AM PST
by
moose2004
(You Can Run But You Can't Hide!)
To: CIB-173RDABN
i agree, this may very well turn out to be a 2 edged sword.
i have cousins who home school. i was thinking of the possibiblity of federal interference via non validation or imposition on curricula for their children.
98
posted on
03/06/2006 7:44:23 AM PST
by
Psalm_2
To: cubreporter
I see, like I said, "pick me up off the ground" I can't believe Ruthie went for this.....
99
posted on
03/06/2006 7:44:48 AM PST
by
Brytani
(Democrats - destroying America since 1868)
To: OldFriend
OOOPS....Grove City takes no federal funds......
100
posted on
03/06/2006 7:45:29 AM PST
by
OldFriend
(HELL IS TOO GOOD FOR OUR MAINSTREAM MEDIA)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-80, 81-100, 101-120 ... 321-340 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson