Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

1 Million Settlement Dover Lawsuit(Most to ACLU, Americans United,not lawyers)
York Daily Record ^ | 2/22/06 | Lauri Lebo and Michelle Starr

Posted on 02/22/2006 6:52:51 AM PST by Nextrush

The Dover Area school board voted Tuesday night to pay 1 million dollars in legal fees to the attorneys that successfully sued the school district over its intelligent-design policy.... After board members voted, Beth Eveland, one of the parents who sued the district, told the board she and other plaintiffs at the meeting considered it a fair offer. However, she said they were dismayed that the taxpayers and children were left with the bill and believed the old board members should be held accountable. The smallest amount of accountability is an apology, she said.... Heather Geesey, the only remaining member from the previous board, said after the meeting that she took offense to Eveland's remarks. "I don't think I have anything to apologize for," she said. Former board member Ronald Short also isn't planning to apologize. "I don't have anything to apologize for," Short said. "I believe in what the board did before." The $1 million dollar figure was the result of an agreement worked out between plantiffs' attorneys and the district's solicitor. In exchange, the board agrees it will not appeal.... Rothschild, the plantiffs lead attorney, said lawyers will request an order in court entitling the plantiffs to more than $2 million in costs.... Plaintiffs attorney wanted to make sure that other public school districts pondering whether to pursue a religious agenda will think twice, Rothschild said, We think it's important that the public record will reflect how much it costs to stop an unconstitutional action," he said. "Still, we also recognize that this is a small school district."...... Approximately $250,000 will go directly to recovering out-of-pocket expenses, Rothschild said, and will be divided among American Civil Liberties Union, Americans United for Separation of Church and State and Pepper-Hamilton. The rest will go toward the ACLU and Americans United.....

(Excerpt) Read more at ydr.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Extended News; Government; News/Current Events; Philosophy; US: Pennsylvania
KEYWORDS: aclu; crevolist; dover; education; evolution; fundingtheleft; ignoranceisstrength; intelligentdesign; legaltheft; perjuryisexpensive; religiousfreedom; thecostofidiocy; youngearthcultists
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 181-190 next last
To: antiRepublicrat

Sure it is. The Judge should have held the line.


61 posted on 02/22/2006 10:37:06 AM PST by muawiyah (-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Steve_Seattle

Definitely ~ part of the problem here is that once it's determined that life originated "out there", we are going to have the ACLU and other Luddite organizations in court demanding that such knowledge be prohibited from exposition in the public schools because, after all, only the "little earth" hypothesis of evolution can possibly be correct ~ and they are going to be waving around prior court decisions and consent decrees to prove their point.


62 posted on 02/22/2006 10:39:33 AM PST by muawiyah (-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Steve_Seattle
BTW, there was no problem whatsoever with Protestant attitudes in the public schools because, after all, there were no public schools. Then, too, there were no problems for the Catholics in the United States since, after all, there were very few Catholics.

It was not until a Protestant dominated government decided it was OK for Catholics to immigrate to the US and another decision was made to have public schools that a conflict was created ~ where no conflict had previously existed.

But who the heck let the ACLU in? Where did those guys come from? Best we ship them back until we can think of a satisfactory place for them.

63 posted on 02/22/2006 10:43:18 AM PST by muawiyah (-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: shuckmaster
They were the main ones and should be held at least partially liable. The DI ducked and ran when they saw the case was a sure loser.

I like that idea. Losing lawyers should pay the fees for the winning lawyers. Maybe then hopeless, frivolous cases would never go to trial in the first case. (Waiting to be shredded by the FR legal experts on this one....)

64 posted on 02/22/2006 10:43:57 AM PST by Quark2005 (Is Gould dead?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: shuckmaster
Some politicians are getting the message as well:

Santorum: Don't put intelligent design in classroom

______________________________

Maybe he looked at the sound thrashing the IDers on the Dover school board members received in a solid GOP county:

Presidential politics: Dover is in York County, which supported George W. Bush in the last two presidential elections. According to unofficial vote totals for 2004, Bush received 114,621 votes and John Kerry received 63,628 votes. [my note: that's about 64% for Bush]

http://www.epodunk.com/cgi-bin/politicalInfo.php?locIndex=275620

65 posted on 02/22/2006 10:44:33 AM PST by Ken H
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: antiRepublicrat

I've seen the "holographic universe" term used elsewhere to mean something quite different. Possibly you missed the Scientific American special edition on "The Universe".


66 posted on 02/22/2006 10:44:43 AM PST by muawiyah (-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Nextrush
Tuesday night, the school board voted 8-0 to pay plaintiffs' attorneys $1 million, plus $1 to each plaintiff.

I assume they will use their $1 checks to get out of town.

67 posted on 02/22/2006 10:46:55 AM PST by oldbrowser (We must act today in order to preserve tomorrow......R.R)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dmz
No, you must satisfy BOTH sections of the religious liberty clause SIMULTANEOUSLY. You can't pick one section to beat up on the other.

The Constitutional requirement on the judge was to handle this case in a strictly secular fashion. That doesn't mean the ACLU can't bandy about charges and so forth, but misbehavior on the part of the board (having "impure thoughts" I think was the charge) does NOT allow the judge to step into the case and commit the same misdeeds.

Think about it ~ just because a serial killer is being tried doesn't give the judge the authority to gun him down as well as the jury and people in attendance.

There are legal standards of a strictly secular nature that must be used in these sorts of cases ~ ACLU proposed shortcuts are merely more of the same sort of garbage we thought we'd put behind us in the Enlightenment.

68 posted on 02/22/2006 10:48:58 AM PST by muawiyah (-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: dmz

Do you really want children taught by people who lie under oath? I find this argument interesting for what it reveals about people's attachment to basic honesty.

If you want a theistic state, take it to the voters. Make it your platform.


69 posted on 02/22/2006 10:49:06 AM PST by js1138 (Great is the power of steady misrepresentation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah
You still cannot be required to state it.

Of course you can. They can require you to state anything that is germane to the case. In most cases religion isn't germane, but this is a case about religion brought about by the religious actions of the school board.

70 posted on 02/22/2006 11:00:29 AM PST by antiRepublicrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah
Sure it is. The Judge should have held the line.

Not it isn't. The judge wasn't being asked to ascertain truth of religious beliefs. He was asked to decide whether ID as presented by the board was science or religion. Truth didn't even come into it, except for the fact that certain board members seemed to be unable to tell the truth.

71 posted on 02/22/2006 11:03:30 AM PST by antiRepublicrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: js1138

BTW, if we were to kick out all the folks who would or have lied under oath from their jobs, we just have more slackers the rest of us would have to support.


72 posted on 02/22/2006 11:04:46 AM PST by muawiyah (-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: antiRepublicrat
No, your religious affiliation is a private matter, and with some religions, e.g. Islam, it is OK to lie to protect the faith.

The US government and its subdivisions simply does not have the authority to punish you for failing to claim a religious affiliation.

73 posted on 02/22/2006 11:05:57 AM PST by muawiyah (-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: antiRepublicrat

The judge really isn't authorized to determine if anything is truly religious in nature. He should keep that sort of thing to himself and off the bench.


74 posted on 02/22/2006 11:06:52 AM PST by muawiyah (-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah

I would rather support them on welfare than in public office. I would rather have my kids taught in a religious school by people who are sincere in their beliefs than by a bunch of hacks who hide their intentions.


75 posted on 02/22/2006 11:08:16 AM PST by js1138 (Great is the power of steady misrepresentation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: Quark2005
I like that idea. Losing lawyers should pay the fees for the winning lawyers. Maybe then hopeless, frivolous cases would never go to trial in the first case. (Waiting to be shredded by the FR legal experts on this one....)

The common objection is that it would discourage legitimate lawsuits from relatively poor private citizens against corporations who have committed an actual civil tort. There's the risk that even with a valid complaint, the corp's army of endless laywers with far more resources than any citizen would outmaneuver the plaintiff, and then the corp could bankrupt the him or her with legal fees.
76 posted on 02/22/2006 11:08:50 AM PST by Dimensio (http://angryflower.com/bobsqu.gif <-- required reading before you use your next apostrophe!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: js1138

How about removing the heavy hand of the state from education?


77 posted on 02/22/2006 11:09:14 AM PST by muawiyah (-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah

It was the school board that started this silliness, not the ACLU or anyone else. You want the state to remain secular, as do I. The Dover school board needed to take creationism and teach it in philosophy class where a)it belongs, and b) I would support it 100%.

I've long been of the mind that in order to really understand western culture and western history, you should be well versed in western religious thinking.


78 posted on 02/22/2006 11:09:29 AM PST by dmz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry

Thanks for the ping!


79 posted on 02/22/2006 11:09:40 AM PST by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: SheLion; Gabz

>>>Approximately $250,000 will go directly to recovering out-of-pocket expenses, Rothschild said, and will be divided among American Civil Liberties Union, Americans United for Separation of Church and State and Pepper-Hamilton. The rest will go toward the ACLU and Americans United.....<<<<

I bet this is exactly how the Tobacco Settlement worked also.

The monies went INTO the NGOs. So the only way to access the monies is by applying for the grants.


80 posted on 02/22/2006 11:13:17 AM PST by Calpernia (Breederville.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 181-190 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson