Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: antiRepublicrat

The judge really isn't authorized to determine if anything is truly religious in nature. He should keep that sort of thing to himself and off the bench.


74 posted on 02/22/2006 11:06:52 AM PST by muawiyah (-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies ]


To: muawiyah
The judge really isn't authorized to determine if anything is truly religious in nature.

That was pretty much his job as agreed to by the school board.

90 posted on 02/22/2006 11:49:28 AM PST by antiRepublicrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies ]

To: muawiyah
The judge really isn't authorized to determine if anything is truly religious in nature. He should keep that sort of thing to himself and off the bench.

Not only that, but he had the hubris to decide demarcation criteria for science that philosophers of science have been unable to agree upon. Do those who favor this ACLU victory really want courts determining what is or is "not a scientific theory"?

Cordially,

97 posted on 02/22/2006 12:14:45 PM PST by Diamond
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson