Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Experts Claim Official 9/11 Story is a Hoax (Super-Mega BARF Alert)
PR Web ^ | 1/30/06 | Unknown

Posted on 01/30/2006 12:50:09 PM PST by ChuckShick

Mon Jan 30, 11:37 AM ET

(PRWEB) - Duluth, MN (PRWEB) January 30, 2006 -- A group of distinguished experts and scholars, including Robert M. Bowman, James H. Fetzer, Wayne Madsen, John McMurtry, Morgan Reynolds, and Andreas von Buelow, have concluded that senior government officials have covered up crucial facts about what really happened on 9/11.

They have joined with others in common cause as members of "Scholars for 9/11 Truth" (S9/11T), because they are convinced, based on their own research, that the administration has been deceiving the nation about critical events in New York and Washington, D.C.

These experts suggest these events may have been orchestrated by elements within the administration to manipulate Americans into supporting policies at home and abroad they would never have condoned absent "another Pearl Harbor."

They believe that this White House is incapable of investigating itself and hope the possibility that Congress might hold an unaccountable administration accountable is not merely naive or wishful thinking.

(Excerpt) Read more at news.yahoo.com ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: 911; 911conspiracy; moonbats; sheehan; tinfoil; whackos
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-149 next last
To: ChuckShick

I'm sure this band of "distinguished scholars" also believes that Santa Claus is a racist construct and that Western hegemony is repsonsible for the rise of Hamas.


21 posted on 01/30/2006 12:56:24 PM PST by Reactionary
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ChuckShick
The New York Times, which, in their opinion, has repeatedly failed to exercise the leadership expecedt from our nation's newspaper of record by a series of inexplicable lapses

Gotta give 'em a thumbs ups for that statement, lol.

22 posted on 01/30/2006 12:56:34 PM PST by mtbopfuyn (Legality does not dictate morality... Lavin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: maineman
I guess they never read the Popular Mechanics article that brought together scientists and engineers and disproved every single one of the moonbat's proof that you outlined here.
23 posted on 01/30/2006 12:56:58 PM PST by mnehring (Perry 06- It's better than a hippie in a cowboy hat or a commie with blue hair.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: mewzilla

How about some "Truth in Advertising"......

all these left-wing dingbat groups should not be allowed to get away with posturing as "non-partisan and objective".... they are the loony fringe of insanity.

Let them be called "Psychotic Morons for Revisionist History" and then we will know who they are....


24 posted on 01/30/2006 12:57:32 PM PST by Enchante (Democrats: "We are ALL broken and worn out, our party & ideas, what else is new?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: ChuckShick

Whack jobs wouldn't know an an attack on this nation is even if the enemy blew up the whack jobs homes.

How is this possible? ( sarcasm based on the moronic writing of this article)

Freaks, stupid freaks.


25 posted on 01/30/2006 12:57:42 PM PST by A message
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ChuckShick
I actually hope they get lots of air time!

(Chuck - Are you still clerking for Judge Smails?)

26 posted on 01/30/2006 12:57:56 PM PST by Niteranger68 ("Only 4 out of 3 Democrats actually vote.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mewzilla

Thanks for the link. Actually, one of them is a client of ours. LOL!!


27 posted on 01/30/2006 12:58:16 PM PST by twigs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: ChuckShick

This guy also believes Bush killed Wellstone. You can safely ignore these guys.


28 posted on 01/30/2006 12:58:42 PM PST by DManA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: twigs
Thanks for the link. Actually, one of them is a client of ours. LOL!!

Are you in psychiatry?

29 posted on 01/30/2006 12:59:15 PM PST by mewzilla (Property must be secured or liberty cannot exist. John Adams)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: ChuckShick

Why is "Ground Zero" cordoned off? So people don't bump into the buildings that are now invisible?


30 posted on 01/30/2006 12:59:55 PM PST by N. Theknow (Kennedys - Can't drive, can't fly, can't ski, can't skipper a boat - But they know what's best.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mewzilla

Those are some of the least "distinguished" faculty resumes I've seen in a long time...


31 posted on 01/30/2006 1:00:38 PM PST by cammie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: ChuckShick; All
* Since the melting point of steel is about 2,700*F, the temperature of jet fuel fires does not exceed 1,800*F under optimal conditions, and UL certified the steel used to 2,000*F for six hours, the buildings cannot have collapsed due to heat from the fires. How is this possible?


OK, quick metallurgy lesson. The steel didn't melt. When steel gets hot, its properties change. At high heat, steel will start to deform more and begin to loose its structural integrity.

Most of us has seen a car that has been burned. The temps in that car were much less than what the WTC had, but the steel left from the car fire is nowhere near as strong as it was before that fire. Imagine that happening to a building.

The WTC was built using truss (sp) construction. The failure pattern of the WTC is exactly what you would expect from such a failure. In fact, I am very impressed the structures held as long as they did!
32 posted on 01/30/2006 1:01:11 PM PST by redgolum ("God is dead" -- Nietzsche. "Nietzsche is dead" -- God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ChuckShick

-A group of distinguished experts and scholars, including Robert M. Bowman, James H. Fetzer, Wayne Madsen, John McMurtry, Morgan Reynolds, and Andreas von Buelow...-

Are they distinguished because they all wear sweater vests and matching socks, or what? I've never actually heard of any of these fools, but I know a fool when I see or hear one.


33 posted on 01/30/2006 1:02:23 PM PST by AmericanChef
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ChuckShick
I don't know...but I watched the 4 hour program on National Geographic and found it to be quite revealing. Lots of info came forward I'd never seen before.

The net of course was full of conspiracy on 911...for one the buildings COULDN'T collapse without bombs. This program explained it was all about jet fuel. Each plane that hit the towers plus the pentagon was FULL of fuel. After several hours of burning jet fuel in tower 1, the metals were weakened and collapsed that tower. The 2nd tower fall before tower 1 due to where it hit.

The pentagon was hit at such a high rate of speed plus all the jet fuel, there was very little left of that jet. Conspiracy claims it was a missile or a much smaller plane.

That program blew those theories out the window, IMHO.

34 posted on 01/30/2006 1:02:43 PM PST by shield (The fear of the LORD is the beginning of knowledge: but fools despise wisdom and instructions.Pr 1:7)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ChuckShick

We believe that the Bush administration has staged the most elaborate and effective cover-up in our history, thwarting even our best efforts to uncover it, but other than that we believe they are incompetent morons who can barely feed themselves.


35 posted on 01/30/2006 1:02:51 PM PST by ZGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ChuckShick
"A group of distinguished experts and scholars, including Robert M. Bowman, James H. Fetzer,..." Article by the ever humble, always self effacing JAMES H. FETZER, who apparently fancies himself a DE&S! Cut me a break.

Not at all surprised that this would come out of the U of M, Duluth, MN. Duluth is often called the "San Francisco of the North". Land of 10,000 looney liberals! Militant
36 posted on 01/30/2006 1:04:29 PM PST by militant2 ("Ted Kennedy is just like one of the family!" Charles Manson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ChuckShick

If there's any conspiracy, the Democrats have more cause to be behind it.

Does anyone else remember what they were screaming right before 9/11? They were complaining that Bush was paying too much attention to nuclear arms and not enough to the possibility of a terrorist attack.

Then, when 9/11 happened, one Dem senator (Carl Levin) immediately gave the "we-told-you-so" response, like "This is what we've been warning all along..."


37 posted on 01/30/2006 1:04:31 PM PST by Tired of Taxes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ChuckShick

Twin Towers were built to be indestructible, but they both were destroyed. How is this possible?

These guys are nuts and I personally know a guy who buys this junk lock, stock and .....


38 posted on 01/30/2006 1:05:18 PM PST by Integrityrocks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ChuckShick

So, are we supposed to believe what we all watched on television with our own eyes never happened. Are we supposed to believe that the pile of rubble where the WTC certainly used to be was just an illusion. Are we supposed to believe that 3000 Americans are all in the witness protection program to assist in this "hoax." And most importantly, are we supposed to believe that after eight and a half months in office, that Bush was able to put this whole "hoax" together, and if so, for what purpose? Was all this to start the war with Iraq? The ware with Iraq was based upon Saddam's noncompliance with UN resolutions going back to 1990, if Bush was determined to go to war no matter what, he didn't need to do this.


39 posted on 01/30/2006 1:05:42 PM PST by wagglebee ("We are ready for the greatest achievements in the history of freedom." -- President Bush, 1/20/05)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ChuckShick

tinfoil hat time!


40 posted on 01/30/2006 1:05:43 PM PST by camle (keep your mind open and somebody will fill it full of something for you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-149 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson