Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Farewell to the GOP, for now at least! (Vanity Rant)
6-21-2006 | Mr. Hammer

Posted on 01/23/2006 5:51:10 AM PST by mr_hammer

Farewell to the GOP, for now at least!

January 21, 2006

To: RNC Chairman Ken Mehlman

Subject: The return of my 2006 RNC Membership Card

It is with deep regret that I find myself writing this letter to you.

I did in fact receive my 2006 RNC Membership Card. I will not be renewing my membership and I am returning the card to you. If you care about the why, then please read this entire letter.

When I pulled the lever for our current President in the elections of 2000 and 2004, this is what I thought I was voting for.

Limited Government

I am at odds with certain aspects of the Patriot Act with regards to the access of all types of records and data that may be private and none of this governments business.

Very appalling also is the attempt of this government to access Google’s database.

Don’t bring the War on Terror into this, you had all the info in the world to nail the 911 hijackers, but the size of the bureaucracy prevented this government from doing so.

Equally disappointing is the bungling of communication that occurred during Katrina. I am not holding the Federal Government responsible for the suffering, but I am making the point that the more you grow the federal Government the less it will actually be able to accomplish.

A Reduction of Taxes and Simplification of the Tax Code

Although some progress has been made on tax relief overall the tax code as we know it is a mess. Let’s move to the “Fair Tax” specified by Congressman Linder and Libertarian Neil Boortz. This will go along way in helping remove the lobbyist influence over our tax code in addition to trapping a lot of currently uncollected revenue.

Giving in to the WTO with regards to expiring export taxes is a joke. What happened to a level playing field? How can the exporters of domestic services and goods compete when you tie their hands behind their backs? How can you encourage investment state side with policies like that?

Adherence to the US Constitution and Working to Up Hold it’s Values!

U.S. Constitution Excerpt

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

The campaign finance law passed under this administration was an direct assault to our Constitution. This must be reviewed and repealed.

U.S. Constitution Excerpt

To provide for calling forth the Militia to execute the Laws of the Union, suppress Insurrections and repel Invasions.

The illegal immigration problem is at critical mass, but our President refuses to act forcefully in concurrence with our Constitution.

U.S. Constitution Excerpt

Nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.

No greater assault on the Constitution and the ownership of private property can be seen than the Kelo decision. Where is the outrage from our supposedly Conservative controlled congress and Senate about this horrendous decision? What about the “Ownership Society” that is so often talked about in the halls of Washington? I cannot even convey the utter disappointment I feel over this.

A Strong Military

I do support the President on Afghanistan and Iraq, but do not support more butter than guns. Being able to afford a couple of hundred state of the art fighter’s is a far cry from where President Ronald Reagan had us a mere 20 years ago.

The Economy

Please, let’s not even go there. The only thing that kept things pointed in what appears to be the correct direction is Alan and the printing press. You want proof? Look at the price of gold and energy; they are the “real” international currency, not the dollar. The current administration and the previous one of Clinton did and are still living off of the economy and military of a real Conservative!

In closing, yes the Administration has done a good job in the Middle East and twenty years from now will probably be seen as a brilliant move in bring democracy there. I just hope we will be as free here at home.

If you need money to fund your mid term elections I suggest you go talk to the people the listed organizations below, because they seem to know what a Conservative should stand for. They are also getting all of my available funds in the future that is if the RNC does not change course.

Minute Man Project

The Gun Owners of America

Aopa

The NRA

Congressman Tancrado

United States Senate Candidate, John Mitchel (To replace the “RINO” Dewine)

Ohio State Gubernatorial Candidate, Kenneth Blackwell

National Right to Life Association

Free Republic.com

P.S. This may not be fact, but it is how I feel. You guys on the hill do not give a rat’s arse about the Constitution or the Son’s or Daughter’s of this Nation. The only thing that seems to matter is the amount of cash that can be jammed in the coffers and pleasing the Socialist One Worlder’s and I for one am sick of it.


TOPICS: Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: allaboutme; conservitive; constitama2shunprty; constitution; crank; dramaqueen; economy; freespeech; goingwobbly; gop; immigration; kelo; lookatme; military; pityparade; pseudoopus; quasiopus; rant; reagan; selfpityparty; taxes; terror; uselessvanity; war; whine; worthlessvanity
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 321-328 next last
To: Dont_Tread_On_Me_888
Limited government?

As in I live in a cabin in the woods, grow sorghum and trap and shoot my own meat, limited government?


Time to move into the real world, which is a bit more complicated than chinking those logs in August.





101 posted on 01/23/2006 6:52:30 AM PST by G.Mason
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: yarddog
"Can't speak for anyone else, but you're exactly right. I'm not a conservative.
Glad to hear you say it. Just wish the rest would."
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>......................
gotta stop responding to that GOP long cabin type RB. He/she/it/ is no more than a Liberal/sicko trying to destroy the principles of GOP or morph it more to the left..
102 posted on 01/23/2006 6:58:19 AM PST by ConsentofGoverned (if a sucker is born every minute, what are the voters?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: ConsentofGoverned
gotta stop responding to that GOP long cabin type RB. He/she/it/ is no more than a Liberal/sicko trying to destroy the principles of GOP or morph it more to the left..

You're a baldfaced liar. If you're going to speak about me in the open, have the courtesy to ping me, okay?


This is a ch__ch. What's missing?

103 posted on 01/23/2006 7:01:46 AM PST by rdb3 (What it is is what it was.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]

To: SittinYonder; mr_hammer

At least his Supreme Court nominees (well, after Harriet Miers) so far have been what he campaigned on. And those are important because they will more likely than not be the Supreme Court justices when our kids are adults!

I, too, wish he would slow the spending. But he never said he would, and I was under no illusions that he was going to if re-elected.


104 posted on 01/23/2006 7:03:05 AM PST by eyespysomething (For you to insult me, I must first value your opinion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: Peach
Listen hear, I specifically stated I do not hold the fed's accountable, but the perceived disarray caused much damage to the President. Had the bureaucracy been smaller the communication would have been clearer.

It appeared that no one was in charge.

We had 3 to 5 days to get ready for that disaster, I truly fear what would happen in a surprise disaster, such as a large earth quake.

IMO This government is bogged down with layers of lawyers and bureaucrats that will prevent it from actually helping anyone efficiently in the future.
105 posted on 01/23/2006 7:03:17 AM PST by mr_hammer (They have eyes, but do not see . . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]

To: mhking; Alia; MikeinIraq; Shade2; bocopar; Petronski; Southack
Please see #102.


This is a ch__ch. What's missing?

106 posted on 01/23/2006 7:06:13 AM PST by rdb3 (What it is is what it was.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]

To: MACVSOG68

Sworn to up hold the Constitution for starters, not sign laws to undemine it. I was quite clear in my rant.


107 posted on 01/23/2006 7:07:11 AM PST by mr_hammer (They have eyes, but do not see . . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: mr_hammer

So what is your goal?

One less vote in any election and if a Dem wins then oh well its not my problem?

Or,

One more vote for an Independent, which equals one more vote for a Dem and if a Dem wins then oh well its not my problem?

Where do you live - in the middle of nowhere?


108 posted on 01/23/2006 7:09:35 AM PST by UseYourHead (Professing themselves to be wise, they became fools.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mr_hammer
Somehow I doubt you've voted Republican in ages if ever.

If you don't like something the GOP has done, work to change it. Run off the join the handful of third party wonders who never win anything and then spend all their time being sad, angry little men if that makes you feel better.

109 posted on 01/23/2006 7:11:33 AM PST by COEXERJ145 (Those Who Want to Impeach President Bush Are the Party of Treason.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ElkGroveDan

I guess standing in the rain at our place of voting handing flyer's, going door to door in favor of a Republican Congressman and other numerous activities does not count?

P.S. It's a heck of alot more than $25.00 Pal!


110 posted on 01/23/2006 7:12:01 AM PST by mr_hammer (They have eyes, but do not see . . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: COEXERJ145
If you don't like something the GOP has done, work to change it. Run off the join the handful of third party wonders who never win anything and then spend all their time being sad, angry little men if that makes you feel better.





Both of the above options assume that one's activism must be focused on the support for parties. Another approach is to support issue related groups of your choice and PACs/Candi ates that you agree with.
111 posted on 01/23/2006 7:17:53 AM PST by rob777
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies]

To: Peach

Exactly what I was thinking - sleeper troll.


112 posted on 01/23/2006 7:18:39 AM PST by UseYourHead (Professing themselves to be wise, they became fools.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]

To: mr_hammer
Sworn to up hold the Constitution for starters, not sign laws to undemine it. I was quite clear in my rant.

Which of those laws were signed after you voted for Bush in '04?

113 posted on 01/23/2006 7:20:35 AM PST by MACVSOG68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies]

To: mr_hammer
Yup, no difference between the parties.

The judges nominated by this president are no different than the judges nominated by the demonrats.

/s

114 posted on 01/23/2006 7:22:15 AM PST by OldFriend (The Dems enABLEd DANGER and 3,000 Americans died.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Peach
Not that the president is perfect, but anyone who didn't know what they were getting when they pulled the lever for Bush wasn't paying attention.

Certainly the second time anyway. But in any case, as we listen to the "ain't never gonna vote GOP again" crowd, I always wonder just where they are going to go. Perhaps they believe that Hillary or Kerry would have nominated Roberts and Alito....

115 posted on 01/23/2006 7:25:19 AM PST by MACVSOG68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies]

To: mr_hammer

I share your sentiments.


116 posted on 01/23/2006 7:27:05 AM PST by Mini-14
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steve0113; mr_hammer
Get a proofreader. Then someone might take you seriously.

I must agree. As sympathetic as I am with many of your goals, if you can't express them properly you're not giving them any reason to bother listening.

Also, I don't think that there's much of a threat in pulling your financial support, unless that support is substantial.

117 posted on 01/23/2006 7:27:21 AM PST by highball ("I find that the harder I work, the more luck I seem to have." -- Thomas Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: mr_hammer

There is no such thing as a civilian organization prepared to jump into immediate action to handle a large scale disaster of any kind, period. Even the military needs some time to operate on a national disaster scale operation and they can launch limited operations within hours.

To expect that somehow if the gov't had been smaller and less money being wasted would allow the federal gov't to supercede local and state gov't operational plans and somehow rescue 100,000 people hours after a disaster is fairly ignorant of reality. It has nothing to do with gov't size or layers - it has to do with local, regional, and state authority coordinating with Federal agencies to augment a plan that needs greater assistance levels than can be provided at the local and state levels.

BTW, if you are expecting any gov't on the face of this planet to come to your immediate rescue in any disaster, you are in for more bad news. Local churches and church supported organizations always accomplish much of the relief efforts in these kinds of situations and are never recognized for their efforts.


118 posted on 01/23/2006 7:28:23 AM PST by UseYourHead (Professing themselves to be wise, they became fools.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]

To: RebelBanker
Do you suppose you should support the most conservative party and/or candidate who can win elections? Otherwise you can support a fringer and help elect liberals. Your call.

There's some disagreement on what kind of candidate can win elections, so I would rather just measure the candidates' conservatism and leave it at that. Your "fringer" label is what passes for debate from your side whenever we have a chance at a real conservative.

119 posted on 01/23/2006 7:31:04 AM PST by palmer (Money problems do not come from a lack of money, but from living an excessive, unrealistic lifestyle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: mr_hammer

120 posted on 01/23/2006 7:31:52 AM PST by demkicker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 321-328 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson