Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Martin Luther King's Conservative Legacy
Heritage Foundation ^ | January 16, 2006 | Carolyn Garris

Posted on 01/16/2006 7:41:10 PM PST by RWR8189

It is time for conservatives to lay claim to the legacy of the Rev. Martin Luther King, Jr. King was no stalwart conservative, yet his core beliefs, such as the power and necessity of faith-based association and self-government based on absolute truth and moral law, are profoundly conservative. Modern liberalism rejects these ideas, while conservatives place them at the center of their philosophy. Despite decades of its appropriation by liberals, King’s message was fundamentally conservative.

 

The Montgomery Bus Boycott, triggered by Rosa Parks’ refusal to abide by local segregation laws, sparked King’s rise from ministering a small church in Montgomery to national renown. King’s primary aim was not to change laws, but to change people, to make neighbors of enemies and a nation out of divided races. King led with love, not racial hatred. From a jail cell in Birmingham, Alabama to the steps of the Lincoln Memorial, his message inspired the nation. And his message and achievements inspire us today.

 

Dr. King believed in the principles of the American Founding. He maintained, "We will reach the goal of freedom in Birmingham and all over the nation, because the goal of America is freedom." Throughout American history, racism has posed a peculiar obstacle to the achievement of that goal. However, Dr. King believed that the Founders had set the nation on the right course. He did not reject the principles of our nation because contradictions existed; instead he hoped that racial groups would put aside their differences and acknowledge the principles that unite all Americans. Today, it is conservatives who seek to unite. In a nation divided by cultural diversity, conservatives defend and celebrate the characteristics that we share as Americans. As America drifts from the ideas and ideals of the Founders, conservatives stand with King as believers that the principles of the American Founding are as relevant today as in 1776.

 

Dr. King believed in a fixed moral law, an anathema to moral relativists espousing subjective values. For King, a just law was "a man-made code that squares with the moral law or the law of God." Dr. King required that his followers lead moral lives, and he emphasized the importance of faith in the face of adversity. Modern liberalism has rebuffed this teaching, dedicating great effort to silence religion and morality. Again, conservatives are the standard-bearers here.

 

For Dr. King, individual freedom depended upon civic responsibility. He proclaimed, "I have a dream that my four little children will one day live in a nation where they will not be judged by the color of their skin but by the content of their character." Racial judgment is inherently unjust, but judgment based on moral character is essential. King wanted his children to live in a colorblind society but not a value-neutral society that rejects all standards of judgment. Today, this is the conservative message. Moral character as expressed in our social interactions is at the center of self-government, which in turn is the sustaining force of American democracy. Conservatives know that without a morally-informed sense of social obligation, we would be rudderless.

 

In today’s parlance, Dr. King's movement would be called “faith-based.” Unlike the doggedly secular groups that now campaign for government action in the name of “social justice,” King’s coalition was explicitly religious, rooted in churches and Christian morality. King’s ever-growing congregation labored for reform in Montgomery, in Alabama, and then all across the country. The Montgomery Bus Boycott testifies to the strength of churches and local institutions to make a difference. The heart of the conservatism has always been grassroots movement, from the bottom up rather than from the top down, focused on faith-based and community associations. While liberals who claim King’s legacy seek to mandate social change from the nation’s capital, conservatives seek to empower communities, associations, and congregations to carry out moral ends.

 

King aimed to unite a divided America behind the goals of the Founders, not to shift fundamentally unjust public policies to favor different groups. Affirmative action stands outside King’s legacy because it requires the government to see Americans as members of privileged and disfavored racial groups, not equal individuals. This is also the conservative view.

 

It is not a coincidence that conservatives share Dr. King's core principles, as they are the principles of the American Founding and continue to guide us today. Dr. King’s dream echoes that of the Founders: "all men are created equal and endowed by their creator with certain inalienable rights that among them are life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness." King’s dream is rooted in the ideas of human equality, individual freedom, and the consent of the governed. These ideas depend on absolute truth and moral law, and they are supported and affirmed by religion and religious association. This dream, Dr. King's conservative message, is nearly lost amidst the worship of cultural diversity and moral relativism. It is still a dream worth pursuing.

 

Carolyn Garris is Program Coordinator in the Center for American Studies at The Heritage Foundation.

 

 

The Words of the Rev. Martin Luther King, Jr.

 

If a man is called to be a street sweeper, he should sweep streets as Michelangelo painted, or Beethoven composed music, or Shakespeare wrote poetry. He should sweep streets so well that all the hosts of heaven and earth will pause to say, here lives a great street sweeper who did his job well.

 

—"Facing the Challenge of a New Age:" Address at the Institute of Non-violence and Social Change, Montgomery, Alabama, December 1956

 

He who accepts evil without protesting against it is really cooperating with it.

—Stride Toward Freedom, 1958

 

I have a dream that my four little children will one day live in a nation where they will not be judged by the color of their skin but by the content of their character.

—"I have a Dream," Speech at the Lincoln Memorial in Washington, D.C., August 28, 1963

 

Now is the time to make real the promises of democracy. Now is the time to rise from the dark and desolate valley of segregation to the sunlit path of racial justice. Now is the time to open the doors of opportunity to all of God's children. Now is the time to life our nation from the quicksands of racial injustice to the solid rock of brotherhood.

—"I have a Dream," Speech at the Lincoln Memorial in Washington, D.C., August 28, 1963

 

Power at its best is love implementing the demands of justice. Justice at its best is love correcting everything that stands against love.

Strength to Love, 1963

 

If a man hasn't discovered something that he will die for, he isn't fit to live.

—Speech in Detroit, Michigan June 23, 1963

 

Shallow understanding from people of good will is more frustrating than absolute misunderstanding from people of ill will. Lukewarm acceptance is much more bewildering than outright rejection.

—"Letter from the Birmingham Jail,"April 1963

 

It is the strangely irrational notion that there is something in the very flow of time that will inevitably cure all ills. Actually time is neutral. It can be used either destructively or constructively. I am coming to feel that the people of ill will have used time much more effectively than the people of good will… time is always ripe to do right.

—"Letter from the Birmingham Jail,"April 1963

 

We will reach the goal of freedom in Birmingham and all over the nation, because the goal of America is freedom.

—"Letter from the Birmingham Jail,"April 1963

 

One day the South will know that when these disinherited children of God sat down at lunch counters they were in reality standing up for the best in the American dream and the most sacred values in our Judaeo-Christian heritage, and thusly, carrying our whole nation back to those great wells of democracy which were dug deep by the founding fathers in the formulation of the Constitution and the Declaration of Independence.

—"Letter from a Birmingham Jail," April 1963

 

Change does not roll in on the wheels of inevitability, but comes through continuous struggle. And so we must straighten our backs and work for our freedom. A man can't ride you unless your back is bent.

—"I See the Promised Land,"Speech in Memphis, Tennessee, April 3, 1968

 

On the Rev. Martin Luther King, Jr.

 

Each year on Martin Luther King Day, let us not only recall Dr. King, but rededicate ourselves to the Commandments he believed in and sought to live every day: Thou shall love thy God with all thy heart, and thou shall love thy neighbor as thyself. And I just have to believe that all of us -- if all of us, young and old, Republicans and Democrats, do all we can to live up to those Commandments, then we will see the day when Dr. King's dream comes true.

—Ronald Reagan, Remarks on Signing the Bill Making the Birthday of Martin Luther King, Jr., a National Holiday, November 2, 1983

 

(In reference to King's quote, "I have a dream that my four little children will one day live in a nation where they will not be judged by the color of their skin but by the content of their character”)

If King's Statement is true, it doesn't matter who says it. If it is true, it is true. Indeed, everyone should say it. Every one of all races should say it.

—Bill Bennett, "The Conservative Virtues of Dr. Martin Luther King,” November 5, 1993

 

Dr. King believed that everybody was capable of enjoying God's redemptive powers. He did not attack his enemies. Like Abraham Lincoln, he believed that the best way to destroy your enemy is to make him your friend.

—Robert Woodson, "The Conservative Virtues of Dr. Martin Luther King,” November 5, 1993

 

There is still a need for us to hear the words of Martin Luther King, to make sure the hope of America extends its reach into every neighborhood across this land. So it's fitting we're here in a church that has got ministries aimed at healing those who hurt, and fighting addiction and promoting love and families. It is fitting we meet here in a church because in this society, we must understand government can help, government can write checks—but it cannot put hope in people's hearts or a sense of purpose in people's lives.

—George W. Bush, Address at First Baptist Church of Glenarden, Landover, Maryland January 20, 2003



TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Editorial; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: civilrights; kingjr; mlk; mlkday; mlkjr; quotes; rights
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last

1 posted on 01/16/2006 7:41:14 PM PST by RWR8189
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: RWR8189

There was a great quote about communism by MLK. Something about I could never accept communism because it rejects God, enslaves people, yada yada. If someone has it please link.


2 posted on 01/16/2006 7:52:40 PM PST by icwhatudo (The rino borg...is resistance futile?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RWR8189

I object to Martin Luther King Day. Every year, we are told to fall to our knees and worship a man, and a severely flawed one, at that. It is especially disgraceful that King is the only American with a holiday in his honor. The day Hispanic pressure groups demand that Congress create a Cesar Chavez Day is right around the corner. Next thing you know, the people who actually founded and built this country will be forgotten, as though they never existed.


3 posted on 01/16/2006 8:02:14 PM PST by Holden Magroin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Holden Magroin

....and Kwanza lasts 4 months of the year.


4 posted on 01/16/2006 8:05:38 PM PST by Westlander (Unleash the Neutron Bomb)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: RWR8189

Conservatives might lay claim to everything except the plagiarizing and the womanizing.


5 posted on 01/16/2006 8:12:51 PM PST by Malesherbes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RWR8189

It has become glaringly evident that there exists an insidious special interest group fully entrenched within the fabric of the country with the explicit agenda to keep the wounds of past social injustices open and festering. The Jesse Jackson's and the Ward Churchill's are examples of this group's field marshals, impressionable youth and the socially disenfranchised its foot soldiers, and the mainstream media its Ministry of Propaganda.


6 posted on 01/16/2006 8:20:00 PM PST by SpaceBar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RWR8189

I think this article is a lot of baloney. There's little doubt in my mind that if he had lived to this day, he would have adopted every political stand of the radical left wing of the Democrat Party. And organized prayer vigils outside Tookie's prison cell, too.


7 posted on 01/16/2006 8:22:04 PM PST by Alberta's Child (Said the night wind to the little lamb . . . "Do you see what I see?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Holden Magroin

There is much to admire about Dr. King. It would not be inaccurate to say that he may have been the "indispensable man" of the civil rights movement. But ANY historical figure MUST be subjected to the sort of legitimate analysis that is critical to establishing context and perspective. For instance, it is my opinion that the greatest political philosophers of liberty in the history of mankind were those men that this nation was blessed to have at its inception, the Founding Fathers. Notwithstanding this opinion, I am constantly being exhorted by leftist deconstructionists to never forget that many of them were slaveowners, sexist, and slaughterers of innocent Indians. None of this changes the totality of my opinion of them in the great good they accomplished by founding this nation.

I simply say that a similar yardstick should be applied to Martin Luther King in assesing the impact that his legacy has on the modern-day civil rights movement.

A new factor has been introduced into modern-day discourse and that is what has become the intellectual scouge of our time, political correctness. This leftist attempt to stifle honest intellectual inquiry does serve to obsfucate and shield those counterproductive aspects of Martin Luther King's legacy and so prevent us from seeing what we need to retain and to reject of it, so that we might move forward to a full realization of the blessings of liberty that this great nation offers for all of its citizens.

The fact is that MLK WAS a socialist and that goes to the heart of what went wrong with the civil rights establishment after the legal battles against codified discrimination were won.

I am a black man who has been getting callouses on my dome from butting heads with those in my community who refuse to relinquish big government statist solutions for the problems plaguing the black community in favor of free market solutions that are far more appropriate today. These forces frequently cite Dr. King and use his exhortations to government to lead the way. They specifically cite his socialist outlook as justification for their continuance.

MLK was a man of enormous charisma and courage and certainly a pivotal figure in the civil rights movement. There is much about him that I admire. An assesment of his life could creditably yield the adjective of great. Despite that, he does not deserve to be the ONLY American with his own holiday named after him. That honor should be reserved for only one person in American history, the greatest of all Americans, George Washington. More so than any other SINGLE figure in our history, he was the "indispensable man." Without his courage, acumen,honor, and integrity, the US would simply not exist, and if it did, it probably would have been as a monarchy and certainly not as a constitutional republic.

MLK's birthday was a sop to PC and a reflection of the DemocRAT Congress that voted it. The depth of MLK's association with the most anti-freedom and murderous ideology (Communism)of our time will prove to very embarrassing when it is fully revealed. Additionally, MLK's legacy to the modern day civil rights movement is a socialist bequeathment, that of looking to big government solutions for many of the behavioral problems in today's black community. MLK continues to cast a long shadow over most of the modern day civil rights establishment and black politicians who largely reject free market, educationally based solutions to the unique problems plaguing the black community.


8 posted on 01/16/2006 8:28:29 PM PST by DMZFrank
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: RWR8189
I believe King was conservative in many ways. Certainly in more ways than he was Liberal. If King had been in a coma for the last 38 years and suddenly come out of it, he would not recognize the democratic party. However the values held by most conservatives, he could readily identify with. He was not one for politics anyway. He was a Baptist Minister first. King certainly had bouts of "living in the flesh"; but who among us has not? But what did King come back to again and again? The truths of the Gospel and of our Constitution. Neither of which democrats / liberals have any respect for nor adherence to. King believed that all men are created equal. Democrats would never agree with him on that. King didn't want hand outs only dignity. Democrats want people to believe they need the hand out. There are to many examples to list. By todays standard and history's standard, King was CONSERVATIVE!
9 posted on 01/16/2006 8:36:01 PM PST by Arcy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DMZFrank

Wonderful post. Thanks.


10 posted on 01/16/2006 8:37:58 PM PST by lesser_satan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: RWR8189

I heard MLK give his "I Have a Dream" speech in Chicago some months after he gave it in Washington. He had reworked it, added to it -- it was the most moving speech I had ever heard. Many in the audience were in tears -- me included. A transcript -- if one exists -- would shed light...


11 posted on 01/16/2006 8:43:38 PM PST by GOPJ (A) Cub reporters acting as stenographers for a manipulative top FBI agent? Q) What is Watergate?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: icwhatudo

There was a great quote about communism by MLK. Something about I could never accept communism because it rejects God, enslaves people, yada yada. If someone has it please link.
-----

Never heard of that. Would be interested too if someone can find it.


12 posted on 01/16/2006 8:52:15 PM PST by traviskicks (http://www.neoperspectives.com/secondaryproblemsofsocialism.htm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: DMZFrank


FYI:
http://www.neoperspectives.com/blackconservatism.htm


13 posted on 01/16/2006 8:54:17 PM PST by traviskicks (http://www.neoperspectives.com/secondaryproblemsofsocialism.htm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: GOPJ; RWR8189; traviskicks
Just a year before he was murdered, Dr. King gave a speech at the Riverside Church in New York explaining why he had begun to speak against the war in Vietnam.

Somehow, I doubt the Heritage Foundation will include that speech among its tributes to the "conservative" Dr. King.

14 posted on 01/16/2006 9:06:44 PM PST by logician2u
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child

Got that just right. MLK had more character flaws than my horse had flies.

He was at the right place at the right time in the Nation's cultural history to very craftily huckster the Civil Rights Cause.

His family has compounded his flaws by their blatant, longstanding and egregious profiteering motives and actions.


15 posted on 01/16/2006 9:33:58 PM PST by dk/coro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: RWR8189
What a pack of hooey.

King was a communist apologist at best, welcoming them into his movement, and no amount of dreaming will make him a conservative.

I'm not a Rockwellian, but this article addresses well this 'conservative' MLK bunk.

16 posted on 01/16/2006 10:09:59 PM PST by LibertarianInExile (Freedom isn't free--no, there's a hefty f'in fee--and if ya don't throw in your buck-o-5, who will?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: logician2u; GOPJ; traviskicks

Ping to 16. Dr. King was a conservative like Molly Yard was a heterosexual.


17 posted on 01/16/2006 10:11:18 PM PST by LibertarianInExile (Freedom isn't free--no, there's a hefty f'in fee--and if ya don't throw in your buck-o-5, who will?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: DMZFrank
The Leftist destructionists will never rest while they have no fear of an Anti-American Activities Committee. That's one very long list. It boggles my mind that so many supposedly "good" citizens wouldn't be bothered being so listed for their attempts to tear down our society...and be proud of it.

Dr. Martin Luther King has indeed been made the symbol and battle standard of the Democrat Party. His message has been twisted to keep the unlearned stuck fast on the Democrat Party's "plantation of dependency"; a mindset that says no one can succeed if you happen to be born with dark skin no matter how talented - success can only be gained by playing the race card and taking advantage of white guilt.

To me that's as good as saying one should just suicide at the first opportunity. Though I happen to be Caucasion I've been through four foster families and an orphanage with none of the supposed "hookups" white people are supposedly privy to on the basis of race. Hard work and proving myself over and over again seems to keep me afloat with nary an invite to a country club yet (at 43 years old).

On the other hand I've not seen evidence of exclusionism in any of my dealings with people aside from bad credit ratings and such. It's possible that I'm just not on the economic level where all the racism is going on - but it's been my view that GREEN surpasses black and white every time.

The wealthy have said that they'd love to emulate Carnegie and his giving peers but they resent how the government extracts what they would voluntarily give forcefully and spend that money foolishly - so they feel that they've been raped for the good of the country without having any say in how their money is spent. In case you didn't know, the officially wealthy shoulder roughly 70% of all taxes (we poor being righ-offs and protected). The rich folks feel that that the government is unfairly soaking them and actively strive to move their wealth elsewhere out of America's grasp.

That the Democrat Party has actively held most of the African-descended down in a victim mentality has been a crime in itself. To be raised believing that everything's against you in the most opportunity-laden land ever almost rivals the Palestinian state where punks broke into a government office, shooting up the ceiling, objecting that a road expansion was going to limit their apartment space. It didn't matter that they didn't pay for those apartments (the UN did) they were still outraged that they were losing space that they believed were due them.

Irony: all these "Palestinians" are actually former citizens of Jordan and other Arab nations that were ousted for radicalism. Their "indespesible man" was Yassir Arafat, who turned out to be a master criminal subverting millions of UN provided dollars to personal accounts.

Yes, there's a point: while Arafat was an active criminal taking advantage of his fanatical following Martin Luther King was totally the inverse - mostly living up to what he preached and truly working for a better society with little thought for his enrichment. He really had a dream and followed it.
18 posted on 01/16/2006 10:15:25 PM PST by NewRomeTacitus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Arcy
If King had been in a coma for the last 38 years and suddenly come out of it, he would not recognize the democratic party.

This is EXACTLY what happens in an episode of the 'Boondocks'. Say what you will about that show (I admit that it lampoons the black gangsta culture without delay), but that episode showcased an interesting 'what-if' scenario.

19 posted on 01/17/2006 3:33:45 AM PST by Ultra Sonic 007 (The opposite of Progress is Congress)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

Comment #20 Removed by Moderator


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson