Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Why do the Democrats always place jerks on the Judiciary Committee (VANITY - kind of like)

Posted on 01/11/2006 7:11:37 AM PST by Tarkin

I guess we all know that the Democrats, and especially the Democrats from the Judiciary Committee are a bunch of %#&*@!, I mean really, the Democrats that sit there are the essence of crazy lunacy. But that's not the point of this post. Recently I was doing a little research on the history of judicial nominations and I found a little information about senator James O. Eastland from Mississippi (of course a Democrat). Of course you could easily suspect that a Southern Democratic senator in the 50s, 60s and 70s would be a racist, but HE was really something:

(from various sources)

During the 1950s, Eastland earned a reputation as an open and unashamed racist and a vociferous opponent of the civil rights movement. When the United States Supreme Court decision in the landmark case Brown v. Board of Education was delivered Eastland denounced it, saying:

"On May 17, 1954, the Constitution of the United States was destroyed because of the Supreme Court's decision. You are not obliged to obey the decisions of any court which are plainly fraudulent [and based on] sociological considerations."

That statement was of course not surprising, as all southern Democrats opposed desegration, but unlike the others he only got worse. In 1956 Eastland while addressing a rally of the White Citizens' Council said:

"When in the course of human events it becomes necessary to abolish the Negro race, proper methods should be used. Among these are guns, bows and arrows, slingshots and knives.... All whites are created equal with certain rights, among these are life, liberty and the pursuit of dead niggers."

Try to imagine ANY Republican saying something like that.. And guess what the Democrats did with this guy? Ehhh, in the same year in which he delivered this nice speech, they appointed him as chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, where he served until his retirement in 1978. You would think that this new, very important position changed him? Wrong! Many years later Eastland would stare coldly down a committee table at Sen. Jacob Javits of New York, who was Jewish (and, of course, Republican) and say, "I don't like you-or your kind." Nice guy, wasn't he? So what did the Democrats do? They made him President pro-tempore of the Senate in 1972! Hey this guy was 3rd in line of presidential succession (and even 2nd in the short periods after Agnew's and Nixon's resignations, when there was no Vice-President). Imagine this nice fellow becoming POTUS! Oh and another small thing, don't forget that he also served as a director of the Pioneer Fund, which described itself as a "foundation dedicated to improving the race". Oh, and also when three civil rights workers Mickey Schwerner, James Chaney, and Andrew Goodman went missing in Mississippi on June 21, 1964, he told President Lyndon Johnson that the incident was a hoax, there was no Ku Klux Klan in the state, and that the three had gone to Chicago.

So overall, he was a nice guy and a fine Democrat, wasn't he? Now you can see why the Democrats made him Chairman of the Judiciary Committee right? After all they place their best people over there. Kennedy, Leahy, Feinstein, Feingold, Biden, Durbin, Schumer et al. (am I forgeting anybody?). James O. Eastland was a worthy predecessor...


TOPICS: Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: 109th; alito; alitohearings; biden; court; democrats; democratsareracists; durbin; eastland; fatted; feingold; feinstein; judiciary; kennedy; kohl; leahy; scotus; senatedems; vanity
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last

1 posted on 01/11/2006 7:11:43 AM PST by Tarkin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Tarkin
it's called voter apathy...tick off enough people with incessant hot air you get voter apathy...apathy=recumbent



Doogle
2 posted on 01/11/2006 7:16:42 AM PST by Doogle (USAF...8thAF...4077th TFW...408th MMS...Ubon Thailand..."69"..Night Line Delivery,AMMO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tarkin

the dems place jerks on committees because that' sall they have.


3 posted on 01/11/2006 7:17:11 AM PST by camle (keep your mind open and somebody will fill it full of something for you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tarkin
Because they have only one Lieberman and he doesn't want to be on the committee.
4 posted on 01/11/2006 7:20:21 AM PST by jazusamo (A Progressive is only a Socialist in a transparent disguise.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tarkin

Maybe they don't place jerks on the committee. Perhaps, the senior Democrats are jerks. The evidence seems to indicate that it is so.


5 posted on 01/11/2006 7:21:54 AM PST by Citizen Tom Paine (An old sailor sends)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tarkin

Because all Democrats are jerks?


6 posted on 01/11/2006 7:22:20 AM PST by RockinRight (The Republicans Suck Less than the Democrats)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tarkin
If the democrats didn't put jerks on senate committees, they wouldn't have any representation on them........
7 posted on 01/11/2006 7:22:40 AM PST by b4its2late (I didn't fight my way to the top of the food chain to be a vegetarian.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tarkin

The Peter Principle.


8 posted on 01/11/2006 7:24:00 AM PST by mewzilla (Property must be secured or liberty cannot exist. John Adams)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tarkin
Why do the Democrats always place jerks on the Judiciary Committee

I thought of it before I read any replies, but being late to the thread I'll have to join the chorus,...

"Because that's all they have."

9 posted on 01/11/2006 7:25:42 AM PST by The_Victor (If all I want is a warm feeling, I should just wet my pants.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

You beat me to it. LOL


10 posted on 01/11/2006 7:28:05 AM PST by Columbine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Tarkin
Why do the Democrats always place jerks on the Judiciary Committee

Because the Democrats' entire bench strength consists of jerks, and if they weren't allowed to field them, they'd have no presence at all on congressional committees.

11 posted on 01/11/2006 7:29:38 AM PST by Maceman (Fake but accurate -- and now double-sourced)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Maceman

ARLEN SPECTOR ---- H - E - L - L - O !!!!


12 posted on 01/11/2006 7:32:28 AM PST by Mayflower Sister (DEMOCRAT: THE PARTY OF COWARDS AND TRAITORS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: camle

Yeah, but they're placing their absolutely WORST jerks on the Judiciary Committee.


13 posted on 01/11/2006 7:34:11 AM PST by Tarkin (Janice Rogers Brown for President!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Tarkin

One man's jerk is another man's advocate.


14 posted on 01/11/2006 7:35:00 AM PST by DTogo (I haven't left the GOP, the GOP left me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tarkin
All democrats are racist,they invented the word..but of course they always make it seem it is the mean republicans that hate blacks..If at anytime the blacks every wake up and see who is trying to keep them in the ghetto the democratic party will be just a memory..I would not bet on that though..
15 posted on 01/11/2006 7:36:38 AM PST by Beth528
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tarkin

16 posted on 01/11/2006 7:43:34 AM PST by SquirrelKing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tarkin

Their only choice other than outsourcing (outside the dem party) is to place jerks on the Judicial Committee-they can't place what they ain't got.


17 posted on 01/11/2006 7:52:17 AM PST by F.J. Mitchell (Maturity has brought me the wisdom to realize just what a world class dumb ass I really am.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tarkin

I think it is very VERY scary that the immediate and future security of America depends upon self-serving career politicians typically representing the Democrat party. Their evident low characters and limited mentalities contrast sharply with Alito's far superior intellect, scope of knowledge and reflected wisdom. I've said it before, and I am saying again: All of America's problems can be directly attributed to Congress and career politicians.


18 posted on 01/11/2006 8:09:18 AM PST by purpleland (Elegy 9/11/01 Vigilance and Valor! Socialism is the Opiate of Academia)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tarkin
To be fair, there's no shortage of irrelevant bloviating coming from the GOP side either.

These things would probably take about 15 minutes if they took the cameras out of the room.

19 posted on 01/11/2006 8:11:33 AM PST by dead (I've got my eye out for Mullah Omar.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tarkin

Are you sure you have the right Eastland? By the time line, maybe his daddy or uncle said these things?


20 posted on 01/11/2006 8:12:29 AM PST by RicocheT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson