Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Where The Boys Aren't
Weekly Standard ^ | January 2, 2006 | Melana Zyla Vickers

Posted on 12/28/2005 10:30:39 AM PST by Daralundy

Here's a thought that's unlikely to occur to twelfth--grade girls as their college acceptances begin to trickle in: After they get to campus in the fall, one in four of them will be mathematically unable to find a male peer to go out with.

At colleges across the country, 58 women will enroll as freshmen for every 42 men. And as the class of 2010 proceeds toward graduation, the male numbers will dwindle. Because more men than women drop out, the ratio after four years will be 60--40, according to projections by the Department of Education.

The problem isn't new-women bachelor's degree--earners first outstripped men in 1982. But the gap, which remained modest for some time, is widening. More and more girls are graduating from high school and following through on their college ambitions, while boys are failing to keep pace and, by some measures, losing ground.

Underperformance in education is no longer a problem confined to black males, Hispanic males, or even poor whites. In 2004, the nation's middle--income, white undergraduate population was 57 percent female. Even among white undergraduates with family incomes of $70,000 and higher, the balance tipped in 2000 to 52 percent female. And white boys are the only demographic group whose high school dropout rate has risen since 2000. Maine, a predominantly white state, is at 60--40 in college enrollment and is quickly reaching beyond it. There are now more female master's degree--earners than male, and in 10 years there will be more new female Ph.D.s, according to government projections. American colleges from Brown to Berkeley face a man shortage, and there's no end in sight.

(Excerpt) Read more at weeklystandard.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society
KEYWORDS: education; highereducation; indoctrination; leftismoncampus; lesbountilgraduation; malestudents
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-104 next last
To: Daralundy
This is not a healthy situation and should NOT be ignored.

"Even now, almost two decades after the failure of the effort to ratify the Equal Rights Amendment, the culture is still in thrall to feminist orthodoxy. The Bush administration declined to do battle against Title IX three years ago, essentially preserving the status quo when college sports teams sued for reforms. Meanwhile, the myopic bureaucrats at the Department of Education are unlikely to take their heads out of the sand unless forced to: As if prompted by the imminent release of Maine's report on how to help boys catch up, the National Center for Education Statistics led its website on December 1 with a colorful chart displaying the sex breakdown at a single high school-one in Bangor, where it just happens that boys outnumber girls. "
21 posted on 12/28/2005 10:57:37 AM PST by nmh (Intelligent people believe in Intelligent Design (God))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BullDog108

Just what I was thinking! :)


22 posted on 12/28/2005 11:04:45 AM PST by cvq3842
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Daralundy

I think it's not sound to equate men not going to college with men "losing ground."

College these days is fairly stupid and lots of people know it. Many guys take a look at what it costs to go to a traditional college and what it costs to get educated other ways (online, junior college, etc. etc.) plus the advantage of being able to get a jump on getting into the workplace and they go for it.

This actually may be a sign that men are acting with more creativity and enterprise than the girls who are herded off to college for a 4-year party.

I know it's only anecdotal, but I see this all the time: a bright and aggressive high school graduate (male) decides he can make it (or at least wants to try) without the traditional college experience (4 years of butt tax).

The guys seem to be more willing to do this. Especially those with good computer and software skills. They often can get good jobs ANd the employer offers tuition assistance for them to go to school on their own time while employed.

I also see the trades no longer being as "blue collar" as they were. More guys see this as a way a smart person can become an entrepreneur and wind up as CEO soon.

For example, a kid we know started digging ditches for an inground lawn sprinkler company while in high school. After helping put in several hundred automatic sprinklers, he realized "I can do this and probably run a business better."

He explained to me that his business plan was install sprinklers and sell maintenance/winterize contracts on as many as possible until he reached "x" number. Then he would have a steady income from the service contracts and he would no longer have to dig the ditches. He wanted to accomplish this in 5 years.

He worked like a dog and dug a lot of ditches himself to minimize the number of people he had to hire. He gave excellent service and call-backs, thus maximizing the number of clients who paid an annual fee for his winterizing services and for other tune-ups etc.

Within five years, he had enough in annual fees to have a nice salary. He installs just enough systems each year to make up for attrition in his maintenance contracts. He's like 25 years old and he has a busy season in the spring and fall for a few weeks.

IOW, he's a very successful business owner and now has the opportunity to do other things.

He said not going to college out of college was a no-brainer at the time and that, even at the ripe old age of 25, he is really glad he did all that digging when he was younger!!


23 posted on 12/28/2005 11:07:43 AM PST by wouldntbprudent
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Daralundy
The irony here is that even if females made up 95% of college students, their earning power would probably still be lower than their male counterparts.

One of the key trends in higher education in recent decades has been the dramatic growth in undergraduate enrollments in useless subject matters like sociology, psychology, etc. I'd be curious to know what the cause/effect relationship between this and the growing female enrollment is.

24 posted on 12/28/2005 11:08:12 AM PST by Alberta's Child (Said the night wind to the little lamb . . . "Do you see what I see?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rocky
But how many of the women are math majors?
I know of of quite a few women who were good math majors. The same goes for chemistry, engineering and physics. And yes, they all excelled beyond academia. Sure, there is still a bit of sexism towards women, but really when you get down to it, all that matters is if you're good at what you do or not. You just can't fake it if you aren't.
25 posted on 12/28/2005 11:13:25 AM PST by Beaker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: yellowdoghunter
Pardon my language but.........

Pussywhipped Socialization? I made sure my son was not.

Thankyou wing nut liberals, for all the Gurly Men!!!

Although the feminine principle is a source of great respect in my life for feminie wisdom...the Wing Nut Libs have changed the cultural balance. This will weaken our nation because it polarizes the sexes socio - economically, increasing the rate of failed marriages. (ie. My daughter married a gangster drop out!)

Image hosted by Photobucket.com

26 posted on 12/28/2005 11:14:16 AM PST by Candor7 (Into Liberal Flatulence Goes the Hope of the West)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Daralundy

Darn it, where were these girls when I was in college!


27 posted on 12/28/2005 11:15:45 AM PST by TOWER
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #28 Removed by Moderator

To: Dan(9698)

You're absolutley right. They have all these "humanities classes" that you have to take as an undergrad and of those there have to be "X" number of "diversity classes" that are of little or no value. This was in the process of getting a dual Physics/Math degree.


29 posted on 12/28/2005 11:19:53 AM PST by Ouderkirk (Funny how death and destruction seems to happen wherever Muslims gather...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Daralundy


Jeez after 40 years of Feminism what do you expect?

Girls underperform so we change the schools. Boys underperform and we want to change the boys.

Despite this fact, I'm sure the left will tell us all about the racism, sexism and homophobia in our schools next time an education spending bill is up for debate (and tell us about how women are being screwed in education.)


30 posted on 12/28/2005 11:28:54 AM PST by Tzimisce
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yellowdoghunter

Maybe they're serving in the military.


31 posted on 12/28/2005 11:29:57 AM PST by Gaetano
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: nmh
...according to studies of Hispanic dropouts.

Now there's a representative population sample.

32 posted on 12/28/2005 11:33:18 AM PST by hschliemann
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Daralundy

Thought for SURE by the title alone that this was Maureen Dowd's latest NY Slimes column, LOL!


33 posted on 12/28/2005 11:34:23 AM PST by Diana in Wisconsin (Save The Earth. It's The Only Planet With Chocolate.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RebelBanker

The LOL is that several FReepers did it anyway, but admit to having done so.


34 posted on 12/28/2005 11:36:53 AM PST by ASA Vet (Those who know don't talk, those who talk don't know.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Beaker

Sorry, I was just joking about the comment which got the president of Harvard in hot water. I didn't mean it to be taken seriously.


35 posted on 12/28/2005 11:37:33 AM PST by Rocky (Air America: Robbing the poor to feed the Left)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Daralundy

The war on boys begins to show results


36 posted on 12/28/2005 11:39:08 AM PST by Vision (“We have now sunk to a depth at which the restatement of the obvious is the duty of intelligent men")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wouldntbprudent

this is how I am directing my sons and daughters. To think of life in terms of income and investment, not salary and vacation time.


37 posted on 12/28/2005 11:39:30 AM PST by Chickensoup (Merry Christmas! Merry Christmas! Merry Christmas! Merry Christmas! Merry Christmas! Merry Chri)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: ASA Vet
Don't Google this threads title at work.

Wow, 16 sequels.

38 posted on 12/28/2005 11:40:12 AM PST by Wolfie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: yellowdoghunter
We have whole generations of men who never learned how to be a man.

Last time I checked they don't teach people how to be a man in college. If you look at the science majors you will see the vast majority are still male. A Betty Crocker degree is what most of these females are getting.

39 posted on 12/28/2005 11:41:22 AM PST by SwordofTruth (God is good all the time.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Daralundy
What they fail to mention is that this applies to liberal arts colleges.

Engineering or science courses continue to have a preponderance of male students.

40 posted on 12/28/2005 11:42:41 AM PST by OldFriend (The Dems enABLEd DANGER and 3,000 Americans died.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-104 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson