Another case of the Clinton legacy
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-25 next last
To: Behind Liberal Lines
Sounds like a class project to me. Someone just forgot to bring the cucumber.
2 posted on
11/16/2005 5:58:11 AM PST by
neodad
(Rule Number 1: Be Armed)
To: Behind Liberal Lines
Begala can consider this a blue state example. He won't.
3 posted on
11/16/2005 5:58:16 AM PST by
BamaAndy
(Heart & Iron--the story of America through an ordinary family. ISBN: 1-4137-5397-3)
To: Behind Liberal Lines
HOMESCHOOL YOUR KIDS!!!
4 posted on
11/16/2005 5:58:59 AM PST by
DesertSapper
(was staunch Republican . . . now looking for real Conservatives)
To: Behind Liberal Lines
I also suspect that the clintoid majority in NY would not approve of "separate" seating arrangements for these Democrats of the future.
5 posted on
11/16/2005 5:59:11 AM PST by
Theodore R.
(Cowardice is forever!)
To: Behind Liberal Lines
School buses are a security and liability nightmare. Drivers are expected to drive and babysit at the same time, and it is not possible. Add to that the administrations' refusal to kick the disruptive kids off the bus.
At the first hint of trouble--make Mommy and Daddy drive Junior to school.
7 posted on
11/16/2005 6:02:37 AM PST by
Mamzelle
(.)
To: Behind Liberal Lines
On the bright side, at least the boys weren't committing the sex acts on eachother, like I'd originally thought from the headline.
Owl_Eagle(If what I just wrote makes you sad or angry,
it was probably sarcasm)
9 posted on
11/16/2005 6:04:51 AM PST by
End Times Sentinel
(In Memory of my Dear Friend Henry Lee II)
To: Behind Liberal Lines
I'm afraid this happens fairly often. My daughter has come home telling me of children smoking pot and having oral sex on the back of the bus. My son told me the same at a different school in this state (Principal was busted for Cocaine.) Needless to say, my children no longer ride the bus, much less attend public school.
I believe you are right, this is Clinton's legacy. I had never heard of teenagers having oral sex in public pre-Clinton.
12 posted on
11/16/2005 6:05:47 AM PST by
publana
(yes, I checked the preview box without previewing)
To: Behind Liberal Lines
Boys will be boys...I recall in the 30s getting whacked by the bus driver for talking too loud. We sure missed out on the good times.
15 posted on
11/16/2005 6:08:41 AM PST by
cynicom
To: Behind Liberal Lines
Not that I'm defending Klintoon but this started before he came to office. I blame TV shows - the sexual content of the shows. When I was a kid that was restricted for after 10 pm - when most kids were asleep. I blame the music and the video games as well. And of course, parents not disciplining their children, suing schools when THEIR child has done something wrong, etc.
16 posted on
11/16/2005 6:16:49 AM PST by
proudofthesouth
(Boycotting movies since 1988)
To: Behind Liberal Lines
A bunch of kids misbehaving. Never heard of that.
The bus rides in my day were where most kids saw their first nudie picture or puffed a cigarette. Sometimes the girls were worse than the boys. Although there is no excuse for forced sexual act, it seems to me that it takes allot for a boy to force a girl and remove clothing, especially on a school bus with other children. I think the boy would have had a few claw marks on him before he even got to that point.
But I don't have all the info on what happened here, so I can't judge. But I don't think it is a sign of the times.
Getting in trouble and fighting are part of growing up. We shelter too much.
17 posted on
11/16/2005 6:17:15 AM PST by
HOTTIEBOY
(Maybe in your house. Not in mine.)
To: Behind Liberal Lines
At least the superintendent apologized and is separating the kids. That's more than you get in most districts.
To: Behind Liberal Lines
Just doing "sex ed homework", right?
23 posted on
11/16/2005 6:32:26 AM PST by
mlc9852
To: Behind Liberal Lines
If the boys had been having sex with other boys, then everything would have been okay.
To: Behind Liberal Lines
State police said a 14-year-old boy was charged in juvenile court with forcing a 13-year-old girl into a sexual act and a 16-year-old boy was charged with a misdemeanor count of sexual misconduct involving a 14-year-old girl.I'm sorry. . .these girls are being forced? I have a hard time buying that.
They are on a school bus, filled with other kids, with an adult driving (and sometimes an aid as well), and a 2-way radio handy to summon police. Seems these girls could have prevented this by screaming bloody murder.
42 posted on
11/16/2005 7:05:40 AM PST by
MEGoody
(Ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free.)
To: Behind Liberal Lines
Seperate rides for boys and girls, Oh, no! What's next, seperate schools?
59 posted on
11/16/2005 7:24:09 AM PST by
Designer
(Just a nit-pick'n and chagrin'n)
To: Behind Liberal Lines
"These cases are coincidental," Cadwell said. "There was no conspiracy."
Nothing new here folks - let's move on...
64 posted on
11/16/2005 7:31:09 AM PST by
traumer
To: Behind Liberal Lines
The single biggest contributing factor - among many - that I have observed from first hand experience with two teenagers- MTV. It is nothing less than soft core porn.
70 posted on
11/16/2005 7:54:26 AM PST by
IamConservative
(Man will occasionally stumble over the truth, but most times will pick himself up and carry on.)
To: Behind Liberal Lines
They were simply getting their homework done before arriving home.
71 posted on
11/16/2005 7:56:24 AM PST by
FerdieMurphy
(For English press one. Only in America!)
To: Behind Liberal Lines
Normally there is no consequence to this behavior on the school bus. But these two boys were heard to utter the phrase, "Oh my God!" at the point of climax. The school could not tolerate such a violation of the separation of church and state during the course of a school function.
Thus the legal sanctions.
91 posted on
11/16/2005 9:53:16 AM PST by
Ghengis
(Alexander was a wuss!)
To: Behind Liberal Lines
"Sex acts on a school bus."
How do we deal with this, introduce them to girls, or give them a set of wrenches?
98 posted on
11/17/2005 10:26:44 AM PST by
Designer
(Just a nit-pick'n and chagrin'n)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-25 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson