[End Times Sentinel]

On the bright side, at least the boys weren't committing the sex acts on eachother, like I'd originally thought from the headline.

Owl_Eagle

(If what I just wrote makes you sad or angry,

 it was probably sarcasm)

[drb9]

I'm not sure that I would consider voluntary homosexual acts to be preferable to involuntary heterosexual acts.

[Wil H]

On the bright side, at least the boys weren't committing the sex acts on each other,..

That's why they are being disciplined, If they had been performing gay sex acts it would have been held up as their right to express their sexuality and celebrated as diversity.

[gdc61]

same initial reaction. (Cynics-R-Us ;) love the disclaimer!!

[monday]

"On the bright side, at least the boys weren't committing the sex acts on eachother, like I'd originally thought from the headline."

I don't think thats better. The girls were forced. Thats always worse than consensual sex, even homosexual consensual sex. Those punks ought to be tossed in prison for a few months so they can see what it's like being forced to do sexual acts by someone bigger and stronger. Then they should be forced to return to school with the word 'rapist' written on their foreheads.

[NCLaw441]

You said: ...at least the boys weren't committing the sex acts on eachother...
***

I agree, but isn't this separation discriminatory of homosexual children, which, given the understanding and liberal nature of New York, likely to be in greater numbers than, say, my backward state of North Carolina? Where is GLAAD, etc? To make a boy sit beside a potential homosexual predator, why, how could they?
/sarc