Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

80% of Potential SCOTUS Nominees on W's List Decline His Offer
Fox News | 10-11-05 | freedom4me

Posted on 10/11/2005 9:08:44 PM PDT by freedom4me

During the 11:00 p.m. (CST) newsbreak, Donna Fuducia reported that Karl Rove told James Dobson that 80% of the potential SCOTUS nominees on the President's list declined his offer because of they didn't want to undergo the grueling confirmation process. Perhaps this sheds new light on the reason why W chose Miers.


TOPICS: Government; Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: bush43; judicialnominees; miers; nothanks; rove; scotus
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 481-500501-520521-540 ... 761-770 next last
To: JCEccles
He should have broadened his criteria to include men instead of playing affirmative action quota games

I couldn't agree more. It seems the Katrina disaster was also affected by the president's reticence to be perceived as usurping the power of a woman governor (although clearly her being a democrat was also a consideration). If women are ever going to achieve true equality, it won't be through affirmative action selections to the Supreme Court, and presidents who tiptoe softly around female governors.

501 posted on 10/11/2005 11:11:14 PM PDT by nerdgirl (just say NO to posters who are "stuck on mean")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Ol' Sparky
Why it is believable when circuit court nominees have waited through years of filibusters and brutal hearings for a chance for a job on the circuit courts? If one can go through that, I see no reason why the same judges wouldn't go through a brutal hearing for a job on the highest court.

The stakes are many, many times higher for the Sup. Ct. than for the lower court levels.

It's not so much that the hearings themselves are so brutal (although they became so for Thomas)- it's that the entire nationwide left-wing wacko character assassination slime machine (which includes, but is not limited to, the MSM) focuses all of its vast resources on destroying this one person. That simply doesn't happen in the case of lower court confirmations.

502 posted on 10/11/2005 11:11:15 PM PDT by SirJohnBarleycorn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 473 | View Replies]

To: freedom4me

I don't believe it. At this point they'll say anything.


503 posted on 10/11/2005 11:11:57 PM PDT by voteconstitutionparty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dolphy
Rick Santorum or John Cornyn would have been shoe-ins. Did you follow the Ashcroft confirmation? There is absolutely no way that Santorum would be a shoo-in.

Ashcroft was a former Senator by that time. And he was confirmed, wasn't he?

As for Cornyn...he's supporting Miers.

I never suggested Cornyn should fight Miers. Just replace her as the nominee when she is withdrawn.
504 posted on 10/11/2005 11:12:27 PM PDT by counterpunch (Save the GOP - withdraw Miers now)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 488 | View Replies]

To: Dolphy

Ashcroft may be on the next list.


505 posted on 10/11/2005 11:12:45 PM PDT by unsycophant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 488 | View Replies]

Ready for some more light?

Remember the defense made on behalf of Miers, that she was instrumental in getting an army of fine, conservative justices vetted and appointed to the the federal appellate bench? Well, it's bunk.

On Prof Eugene Volokh's blog someone has done some fact-checking and discovered that of the 14 such appointments that have been made since Miers took over the job in February of this year, 11 of them were approved just a few days after she took over the job. And, no, that DOESN'T mean she had anything to do with it. It was far too late for her to do anything meaningful at that point.

It means her timing was impeccable in that she was on watch when someone else's hard work paid off. She was and is basking in the light of reflected glory.

That's been Miers all along. She has amazing timing to be in the right place at the right time, working for the right person.

506 posted on 10/11/2005 11:13:08 PM PDT by JCEccles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BigSkyFreeper
I've been enrolled in the Republican Party since I first registered to vote, back in 1999.

That doesn't mean that I have to swallow the garbage being foisted upon me by toadying crap-weasels and yes-men like Andy Card, Ed Gillespie, among other parts of the GOP spin machine.

507 posted on 10/11/2005 11:13:46 PM PDT by Do not dub me shapka broham ("We don't want a Supreme Court justice just like George W. Bush. We can do better.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 493 | View Replies]

To: Do not dub me shapka broham

The line that everybody but Miers turned down the fight that Rush Limbaugh et. al. wanted isn't sitting well with me at all.

I don't expect Rush is pleased with this either, assuming it's not just fog and really is coming from the Republican establishment.


508 posted on 10/11/2005 11:14:14 PM PDT by Kryptonite
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 475 | View Replies]

To: Do not dub me shapka broham
I've been enrolled in the Republican Party since I first registered to vote, back in 1999.

Fine. I've been registered as a Republican since 1988, and I don't put "party" at the top of my list of priorities.

510 posted on 10/11/2005 11:15:32 PM PDT by BigSkyFreeper ("Don't Get Stuck On Stupid!" - Lieutenant General Russell "Ragin' Cajun" Honore)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 507 | View Replies]

To: BigSkyFreeper
"My point is this sexism charge is phony."

I agree.

511 posted on 10/11/2005 11:15:51 PM PDT by sageb1 (This is the Final Crusade. There are only 2 sides. Pick one.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 498 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson
Well, that leaves 20% who are unafraid hard as nails conservatives. Damn the RINOs, let the battle rage on!

That 20% may be hard as nails but it doesn't necessarily follow that they are more or less Conservative than Miers.

512 posted on 10/11/2005 11:16:10 PM PDT by Mike Darancette (Mesocons for Rice '08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Do not dub me shapka broham

and PC blaming (elitism and sexism) coming from the White House

but....this thread is encouraging

been awhile


513 posted on 10/11/2005 11:16:15 PM PDT by wardaddy (Save a cow......eat a vegetarian.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 507 | View Replies]

To: jveritas; Pukin Dog
Pukin Dog: Great work in your last opus. Many knee jerk freepers owe you an apology for making fun of what you said.

Hold on big guy. Just because Rove's spinning Dobson sure as hell doesn't make it true. I don't deny Pukin Dog was communicating accurately his sources. BUT the story smells like SPIN. I guess we'll have to wait a decade for the FOIA documents and memoirs to really understand why Bush made this boneheaded decision.

514 posted on 10/11/2005 11:16:35 PM PDT by Maynerd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Kryptonite
I can't wait for him to come out full-bore against this nomination.

Then the Republican "establishment" is really going to feel the heat.

515 posted on 10/11/2005 11:16:58 PM PDT by Do not dub me shapka broham ("We don't want a Supreme Court justice just like George W. Bush. We can do better.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 508 | View Replies]

To: freedom4me

The RATS are completely and totally to blame for this.


516 posted on 10/11/2005 11:17:20 PM PDT by balch3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: You Dirty Rats
The "public" couldn't care less about Circuit Court nominees. They are too busy watching Judge Judy taking out her menopause on hapless participants in her "Court"

That sure is a depressing message - certain to energize the base. "We aren''t trying to restore COnstitutional government because the public is too stupid and lazy."

I see a BOHICA coming, whether I work for it or not, in your scenario. Is this the best the GOP can do? Seriously? This is IT? This is really really the BEST? And I don't mean ultimate best, I mean best under the circumstances.

If so, it's all downhill from here. Because this BEST falls far short of my reasonable expecations. I've heard the salse pitch here for a week, and it falls f-l-a-t.

517 posted on 10/11/2005 11:17:24 PM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 483 | View Replies]

To: Iwo Jima

My thoughts exactly; You are so right!


518 posted on 10/11/2005 11:17:39 PM PDT by Walkenfree ("Aspire to Inspire before you expire")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

" How many millions more are we going to allow the Democrats to kill in the womb before someone steps up to the plate?"

In addition to ROE, the KELO decision is of great importance, the abolition of private property is one of the goals in the communist manifesto.

imagine waco style attacks on property owners who refuse to hand it over to the government.


519 posted on 10/11/2005 11:17:46 PM PDT by Stellar Dendrite ( Mike Pence for President!!! http://acuf.org/issues/issue34/050415pol.asp)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 500 | View Replies]

To: Walkingfeather
Oh, no, I assume that not only would my true faults be examined (of which I have all too many), but that every human foible I ever had would be exaggerated beyond recognition.

My point is that people lying about me and trashing my reputation for all of eternity would be far less grievous than what we ask our soldiers to do for us.

I am more than willing to have someone put out lies about me than I am to let my children know that I would not do my duty to preserve our country. In fact, if it should come to that, I would prefer that my country be preserved for my children than that they have a good opinion of me personally. (oh, but what an awful choice!)
520 posted on 10/11/2005 11:18:11 PM PDT by Iwo Jima
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 479 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 481-500501-520521-540 ... 761-770 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson