Posted on 10/11/2005 4:07:11 AM PDT by mlc9852
MONDAY, Oct. 10 (HealthDay News) -- Head to the American Museum of Natural History's Web site, and you'll see the major draw this fall is a splashy exhibit on dinosaurs.
And not just any dinosaurs, but two-legged carnivorous, feathered "theropods" like the 30-inch-tall Bambiraptor -- somewhat less cuddly than its namesake.
The heyday of the theropods, which included scaly terrors like T. rex and velociraptor, stretched from the late Triassic (220 million years ago) to the late Cretaceous (65 million years ago) periods.
(Excerpt) Read more at news.yahoo.com ...
If you can give me a complete and "finished" (meaning not missing any "missing links")fossil record, starting with the big bang, then I'll start to take you seriously. Even then, that doesn't mean that evolution's true. Oh, btw, if the big bang actually happened, where did all the matter for the big bang come from? If you are a "scientist" and not a "layperson" you will be able to give a better answer than the "oh it was always there" after all, it had to come from somewhere, right?
Now that is a pretty stupid statement! I know and can articulate what I believe in, God created the everything and He did it in six days!
Now, let's see you articulte what you believe as clearly.
Take as much space as you want, I really need a good alugh this moring, you evolutionist keep digging a deeper and deeper hole for yourselves. Open mouth insert millions and millions of feet.
Don't have time to look at your silly links, just answer the questions, if you can, which I doubt. Don't try sending me all over the net to do yur homework, if yu can't answer the question jsut say "Da, I don't know... but, I know my great, great granddaddy 2 zillion times removed was either a rock, or a monkey."
By such a ridiculously high standard of proof, no one would accept any religion either, or anything else at all.
If those are the lengths you will go to in order to shield yourself from following the massive amounts of evidence where it overwhelmingly indicates, I will not trouble you with pesky real-world evidence. Enjoy your beliefs, I hope they serve you well. I wouldn't dream of making you uncomfortable by presenting you with facts which might cause you to question your premises.
Now that is a pretty stupid statement! I know and can articulate what I believe in, God created the everything and He did it in six days!
And this has *what* to do with my observation about how you don't know anything about evolutionary biology, and thus you laugh at it? Oh, right, nothing.
Now, let's see you articulte what you believe as clearly.
Okay: I believe you're trolling.
That's because a half a wing WOULD be unworkable and useless
Didn't bother to actually read the rest of the post, I see...
When you say millions and millions of years, you are calling God a liar! When you say we evolved, you are calling God a liar! Read Genesis chapter one and two. God says In the beginning He made everything. He says He did it in six literal 24 hour days, Read Exodus 2-:11, written not by man but by the very finger of God.
You attack me and you call God a lair instead of defending your humanist religious belief. Go to the moderator see if he or she agrees with you.
Now tell me, according to your religious belief in evolution, how did you get here? Why are you here? What happens to you after you die?
Tell me, as an evolutionist, How did we get here? Why are you here? What happens to you after you die? What do you use for the basis of law? Whose laws do you follow? Are there any absolutes? If so, if they do not come for God where do they come form? And if not, are you absolutely sure?
Can't risk actually *learning* something, eh?
just answer the questions, if you can, which I doubt.
I *have* answered the questions already. Try to keep up.
Don't try sending me all over the net to do yur homework,
I'm trying to get you to do *your* homework before you spout off more nonsense, son. If you don't know the subject, stop making confidently arrogant (and wrong) pronouncements about it.
And if you can't be bothered to actually read a technical answer, stop asking questions about how science works. It's a technical field, and proper answers can't be accurately distilled down to the sort of bumper-sticker slogans that creationists are so fond of. If you want to learn how radiometric dating works, in sufficient depth to be confident that it's accurate and a valid method of determining dates, you're going to have to actually *LEARN* how it works, in detail. If you can't be bothered with that, feel free to skip the science threads and go hang out on the daily cartoon threads or something else more in line with your capabilities.
if yu can't answer the question jsut say "Da, I don't know... but, I know my great, great granddaddy 2 zillion times removed was either a rock, or a monkey."
Your shtick gets old and boring pretty fast.
Ah and your evolutionary faith reminds me of the princess who kissed the frog and the frog became a prince. Yu guys have just changed the method, she kissed the frog and he became a prince, you guys replaced the kiss with millions and millions of years, and the frog became a prince.
By the way, I love the way you guys say, with a straight face and an ever so condescending tone,: "Billions and Billions of years ago, in a galaxy far, far away, there was nothing and this nothing..."
The CrevoSci Archive Just one of the many services of Darwin Central "The Conspiracy that Cares" |
CrevoSci threads for the past week:
CrevoSci Warrior Freepdays for the month of October:
2003-10-09 antiRepublicrat 2004-10-10 Antonello 1998-10-18 AZLiberty 1999-10-14 blam 2000-10-19 cogitator 2001-10-21 Coyoteman 2004-10-26 curiosity 1998-10-29 Dataman 2000-10-29 dila813 2005-10-07 Dinobot |
2001-10-14 dread78645 1998-10-03 Elsie 1998-10-17 f.Christian 2002-10-08 FairOpinion 2001-10-26 Genesis defender 2000-10-09 Gil4 2000-10-08 guitarist 2004-10-10 joeclarke 1998-10-03 js1138 2001-10-24 k2blader |
2000-10-08 LibWhacker 2002-10-25 m1-lightning 2001-10-10 Michael_Michaelangelo 2001-10-09 Mother Abigail 2004-10-25 MRMEAN 2004-10-03 Nicholas Conradin 1999-10-28 PatrickHenry 1998-10-01 Physicist 1998-10-25 plain talk |
1998-10-12 Restorer 2005-10-04 ret_medic 2001-10-23 RightWingNilla 2004-10-09 snarks_when_bored 1998-10-04 Southack 2002-10-22 sumocide 2004-10-21 WildHorseCrash 2001-10-23 yankeedame 2002-10-20 Z in Oregon |
In Memoriam
|
self ping
"How did we get here?"
Not sure, but many of us are not content with "God did it, it's a miracle" as the answer to that question.
"Why are you here?"
Good question. I tend to believe there is no real point.
"What happens to you after you die?"
I'd put my money on "nothing exciting".
"What do you use for the basis of law?"
Property rights.
"Whose laws do you follow?"
The ones agreed upon by the society in which I live.
"Are there any absolutes?"
Only one I can think of, that any absolute can change if the evidence changes, a great catch 22.
Far be it for me to interrupt, but I thought you mind find this quote interesting.
I fully agree with your comments about the lack of direct illustration of evolutionary transitions in my book. If I knew of any, fossil or living, I would have certainly included them.... Dr. Colin Paterson, British Museum of Natural History
Another command performance! My hat's off to you sir.
And while I am in total disagreement with yur answers, I hnestly do appreciate your taking the time to answer them.
Jake
Thank you for this excellent post. It's a shame that it is dismissed out of hand by those who need to read it the most.
Yawn. Another dishonestly out-of-context quote from an anti-evolution creationist. Plus, the sky is blue.
See: Patterson Misquoted: A Tale of Two 'Cites'
Do you guys *practice* at being dishonest?
Here's a full quote from Patterson which clearly demonstrates that you're misrepresenting his actual position concerning the existence of transitional fossils:
"In several animal and plant groups, enough fossils are known to bridge the wide gaps between existing types. In mammals, for example, the gap between horses, asses and zebras (genus Equus) and their closest living relatives, the rhinoceroses and tapirs, is filled by an extensive series of fossils extending back sixty-million years to a small animal, Hyracotherium, which can only be distinguished from the rhinoceros-tapir group by one or two horse-like details of the skull. There are many other examples of fossil 'missing links', such as Archaeopteryx, the Jurassic bird which links birds with dinosaurs (Fig. 45), and Ichthyostega, the late Devonian amphibian which links land vertebrates and the extinct choanate (having internal nostrils) fishes. . ."
-- Dr. Colin Patterson in his book "Evolution" (1978, Routledge & Kegan Paul Ltd.).
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.