Skip to comments.
Supernova Storm Wiped Out Mammoths?
Discovery News ^
| 09/28/05
| Jennifer Viegas
Posted on 10/04/2005 11:47:27 PM PDT by planetesimal
A supernova blast 41,000 years ago started a deadly chain of events that led to the extinction of mammoths and other animals in North America, according to two scientists.
If their supernova theory gains acceptance, it could explain why dozens of species on the continent became extinct 13,000 years ago.
(Excerpt) Read more at dsc.discovery.com ...
TOPICS: Culture/Society
KEYWORDS: archaeology; catastrophism; clovis; clovisimpact; evolution; extinction; godsgravesglyphs; history; impact; mammoth; supernova
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-85 next last
For those that missed the "World of Elephants" shindig a few weeks ago, which I'm guessing is pretty much everyone. :)
To: planetesimal
well, time to change those science books AGAIN as another theory falls on its face. apparently. maybe. for a while.
2
posted on
10/04/2005 11:50:13 PM PDT
by
GeronL
(Leftism is the INSANE Cult of the Artificial)
To: planetesimal
Except that 30000 to 13000 years ago is withing the memory of mankind (oral traditions, cave paintings), and nothing like this is evident. Being hunted to death seems more likely
Some scholars even believe mankind had memory of Neanderthals. "For in those days there were giants in the earth that bread with the son of man".
3
posted on
10/04/2005 11:56:23 PM PDT
by
konaice
To: konaice
Neandertal DNA is not close enough to Homo sapiens DNA for this to happen.
4
posted on
10/04/2005 11:57:49 PM PDT
by
The Red Zone
(Florida, the sun-shame state, and Illinois the chicken injun.)
To: The Red Zone
Neandertal DNA is not close enough to Homo sapiens DNA for this to happen. BS. they are closer than horses and asses.
Besides, nobody said the breeding was successful (yielded viable offspring).
5
posted on
10/04/2005 11:59:54 PM PDT
by
konaice
To: planetesimal
How long before it's blamed on President Bush?
6
posted on
10/05/2005 12:02:13 AM PDT
by
Choose Ye This Day
(I just stepped in a big pile of sassy.)
To: konaice
It's hard to call it "breeding" when nothing is born.
7
posted on
10/05/2005 12:02:18 AM PDT
by
The Red Zone
(Florida, the sun-shame state, and Illinois the chicken injun.)
To: Choose Ye This Day
Bush doesn't care about mammoths.
8
posted on
10/05/2005 12:04:34 AM PDT
by
Jeff Chandler
(Peace Begins in the Womb)
To: The Red Zone
It's hard to call it "breeding" when nothing is born. Go learn the difference between horses and asses and donkeys, and then perhaps we can have this discussion.
Remember, its not my theory, but its one possible explanation of that phrase.
9
posted on
10/05/2005 12:05:21 AM PDT
by
konaice
To: konaice
I hate it when giants bread with me. Let them get their own bread. You know how big a loaf those guys can eat?
10
posted on
10/05/2005 12:06:46 AM PDT
by
DannyTN
To: konaice
Fair point, but many species went extinct around that time, including:
In addition to the tusk evidence, the scientists said arrowheads from North America's prehistoric Clovis culture, which went extinct around 13,500-13,000 years ago, Icelandic marine sediment, as well as sediment from nine 13,000-year-old sites in North America, contain higher-than-normal amounts of radiation in the form of potassium-40 levels.
This is by no means settled science, but interesting nonetheless.
To: Jeff Chandler
12
posted on
10/05/2005 12:08:02 AM PDT
by
Choose Ye This Day
(I just stepped in a big pile of sassy.)
To: planetesimal
"What is exciting about Dr. Firestone's theory is that it can be easily tested," Becker said,I'm waiting. I'm still waiting. Still waiting. Still.....
13
posted on
10/05/2005 12:08:46 AM PDT
by
taxesareforever
(Government is running amuck)
To: The Red Zone
14
posted on
10/05/2005 12:10:09 AM PDT
by
DannyTN
To: taxesareforever
I'm waiting. I'm still waiting. Still waiting. Still.....
Why not try a personal ad? Or take up a hobby.
To: planetesimal
THIS guy has a far more plausible explanation for ice ages and extinctions than any other theoretician I've yet found.
16
posted on
10/05/2005 12:26:55 AM PDT
by
Don W
(Nevermind, I live in CUBA-NORTH! AKA Canuckistan)
To: konaice
I seriously doubt the 'hunted to death' theory. What really piques my interest is the frozen mastadons found in Siberia that have fresh flowers in their teeth, and unprocessed vegetation in their gastric system. It's like they just up and died, and froze, in minutes.
17
posted on
10/05/2005 12:50:25 AM PDT
by
SoDak
To: planetesimal
18
posted on
10/05/2005 12:54:08 AM PDT
by
Old Seadog
(Birthdays start out being fun. But too many of them will kill you..)
To: SoDak
What really piques my interest is the frozen mastadons found in Siberia that have fresh flowers in their teeth, and unprocessed vegetation in their gastric system. It's like they just up and died, and froze, in minutes. Up here in Alaska, and I speculate also in Siberia, you can have a thin layer of melted earth in the spring, and flowers blooming in just a week or so of sunshine. But underneath you have permafrost.
However there are sink holes with water running underneath, and iced over lakes/rivers that look walk-able. Walk out, fall in, and freeze next to or under the permafrost.
19
posted on
10/05/2005 12:59:27 AM PDT
by
konaice
To: konaice
But that's in spring. Wouldn't the coming warming, albeit a short warm season, allow predation and deterioration?
20
posted on
10/05/2005 1:02:26 AM PDT
by
SoDak
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-85 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson