Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

MIERS FOUND CHRIST, TURNED REPUBLICAN
www.drudgereport.com ^ | TUE OCT 04, 2005 | matt drudge

Posted on 10/04/2005 3:49:42 PM PDT by Para-Ord.45

Support The DrudgeReport; Visit Our Advertisers

XXXXX DRUDGE REPORT XXXXX TUE OCT 04, 2005 18:02:01 ET XXXXX

MIERS FOUND CHRIST, TURNED REPUBLICAN

By 1979, Harriet Miers, then in her mid-30s, had accomplished what some people take a lifetime to achieve. She was a partner at Locke Purnell Boren Laney & Neely, one of the most prestigious law firms in the South.

But she still felt something was missing in her life.

The NEW YORK TIMES is set to splash the "something" on Page Ones on Wednesday, newsroom sources tell the DRUDGE REPORT.

It was after a series of long discussions with Nathan Hecht, a junior colleague and sweetheart, that led her to a decision that many of the people around her say changed Miers life.

"She decided that she wanted faith to be a bigger part of her life," Hecht said. "One evening she called me to her office and said she was ready to make a commitment," to accept Jesus Christ as her savior and be born again, Hecht said. Miers became an evangelical Christian and began identifying more with the Republican Party than with the Democrats who had long held sway over Texas politics. Developing...

----------------------------------------------------------- Filed By Matt Drudge Reports are moved when circumstances warrant http://www.drudgereport.com for updates


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: bornagain; drudge; harrietmiers; ussc
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 261-280281-300301-320 ... 361-367 next last
To: conservativepoet
She voted for Bush after she donated to Gore. By the way Gore was pro-life then.

You are ignoring the fact that she donated to the DNC five days before the 1988 Presidential election for the purpose of seeing the pro-abort Dukakis elected. Had nothing to do with Gore.

281 posted on 10/04/2005 6:22:27 PM PDT by Jim_Curtis (How do we prevent someone from torching his city if he will be rewarded as a lottery winner?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 278 | View Replies]

To: flashbunny

"Based on a couple sentences.

How has she ruled in the past?

Oh wait, she never has."

Neither had Rehnquist.


282 posted on 10/04/2005 6:25:40 PM PDT by Artemis Webb (GO CARDINALS !!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Jim_Curtis

And it looks like you're ignoring the present:

Miers Found Christ, Turned Republican

By the way, that's an evangelical Christian. Dick Cheney, James Dobson, Jay Sekulo, Orin Hatch, Chuck Colson, American Center for Law and Justice would not endorse her if she was in love with Dukakis.


283 posted on 10/04/2005 6:27:10 PM PDT by conservativepoet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 281 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone
You know nothing of the Texas political situation in 1988, apparently. The Republican Party barely existed.

Even if everyone in Texas voted for Dukakis ( they didn't, Bush 41 actually carried Texas ), I'm sure there were a few Texans who didn't contribute to the DNC five days before the election.

284 posted on 10/04/2005 6:31:14 PM PDT by Jim_Curtis (How do we prevent someone from torching his city if he will be rewarded as a lottery winner?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 280 | View Replies]

To: Jim_Curtis
Miers contributed to the DNC five days before the 1988 Presidential election.

Guess she's "experienced" in knowing the enemy. Churchill was like that, too. No, I do not wish to liken the office to which she has been nominated to that of Winston Churchill. Most people undergo philosophical sea change in life. Methinks Miers has had enough of that.

285 posted on 10/04/2005 6:32:13 PM PDT by Fester Chugabrew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 276 | View Replies]

To: Jim_Curtis
Okay, please continue to focus on that instead of everything she's done since then. That will justify your opposition and your contention that she's really a radical Democrat serving as White House Counsel, screening judges that have already been nominated and approved including all the favorites mentioned at this forum.

You keep focusing on 1988 and a check that was written. You need something to hang your opposition on.

286 posted on 10/04/2005 6:34:42 PM PDT by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 284 | View Replies]

To: conservativepoet

Is Cheney a Christian?

Also, I thought Hatch was Mormon.


287 posted on 10/04/2005 6:36:56 PM PDT by k2blader (Hic sunt dracones..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 283 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone
A radical Democrat is a horrible mischaracterization.

Actually it makes for a more profound contrast. She once was lost, but now she's found. I could give a rat's behind if she was once a radical liberal Democrat. But it matters a great deal if she understands the inherent moral turptitude involved with "safe, legal abortion." Guilt by association is a poor argument both logically and legally.

288 posted on 10/04/2005 6:40:50 PM PDT by Fester Chugabrew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 280 | View Replies]

To: little jeremiah
(Coudln't get your picture, unless you wanted to post a red x in a square!:-))

It was a smiley with a bucket of popcorn..

I've been Over Whelmed and busy the last few days, I sneak in and check FR when no one is looking...

I'll try to ping the list for a few days as things get back to normal here.

Sure is a wild ride with H. Miers. What do you think? You know about her, being from the same general area? Any secret knowledge the rest of us don't know?

I've never heard of her before this, This thread eases my mind a little. (just a little) We'll just have to wait and see.

289 posted on 10/04/2005 6:42:12 PM PDT by DirtyHarryY2K (http://soapboxharry.blogspot.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 274 | View Replies]

To: Jim_Curtis

Question, the dates given for contributions. Are they the date it was made or the date it was reported?


290 posted on 10/04/2005 6:45:07 PM PDT by Raycpa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 284 | View Replies]

To: conservativepoet
She voted for Bush after she donated to Gore. By the way Gore was pro-life then

Not. See post 201.

291 posted on 10/04/2005 6:45:17 PM PDT by handy (Forgive me this day, my daily typos...The Truth is not a Smear!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 278 | View Replies]

To: flashbunny

Congress, my dear.


292 posted on 10/04/2005 6:45:27 PM PDT by mabelkitty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 154 | View Replies]

To: k2blader

They share certain ethical attitudes that are consistent with Christian ethics though there are differences between them.


293 posted on 10/04/2005 6:46:37 PM PDT by conservativepoet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 287 | View Replies]

To: conservativepoet

well, they're liberals, so they probably will!


294 posted on 10/04/2005 6:47:27 PM PDT by flashbunny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 271 | View Replies]

To: chronic_loser

I must if you have such a strong reaction to it.
Read the pages regarding the translation - it's in there. I have.
And promptly rid myself of it for a vintage New American Standard translation (hubby prefers Scofield).


295 posted on 10/04/2005 6:47:54 PM PDT by mabelkitty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 151 | View Replies]

To: mabelkitty

yes, bush deserves none of the blame.

But all of the credit!

Amazing how that works.


296 posted on 10/04/2005 6:48:20 PM PDT by flashbunny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 292 | View Replies]

To: handy

I appreciate the correction. However, check out the title of this thread. Do you really think Cheney, James Dobson, etc., etc. would support a pro-abortion candidate?


297 posted on 10/04/2005 6:49:15 PM PDT by conservativepoet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 291 | View Replies]

To: Fitzcarraldo

> Bush is laying a trap designed to show just how intolerant the leftists are.

I'm beginning to believe exactly that.


298 posted on 10/04/2005 6:49:22 PM PDT by XEHRpa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: handy
But Gore campaigned in Texas in 1988 as a pro-life Democrat.

Also, keep in mind, that in 1988 (in the pre-internet era), it was not as easy check the various voter ratings.

299 posted on 10/04/2005 6:50:14 PM PDT by writmeister
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 291 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone

"I'm wasting my time talking to you. You're not a serious contender."

Aww, and in your poor judgement, you've already wasted so much time!


"Another hot button issue for the people who can't capitalize the name of our president"

Ah, okay, now failure to capitalize a name is a damning offense. But somehow you failed to capitalize "President".


300 posted on 10/04/2005 6:50:42 PM PDT by flashbunny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 266 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 261-280281-300301-320 ... 361-367 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson