Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Harriet Miers a replacement for Justice Sandra Day O'Connor? (DRUDGE HEADLINE)
The Drudge Report ^ | 9-28-2005 | Drudge

Posted on 09/28/2005 5:49:04 PM PDT by KStorm

Just a headline, presently.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 59yearsold; 60yearsold; 60yearsoldalready; algore; algore4prezdonor; anothertexan; benson4senatedonor; bushcrony; bushsfault; corruption; dncdonor; donor; drudge; harrietmiers; itsbrown; justice; liberal; liberals; miers; nomiers; old; rats; rino; scotus; shedonatedmoneytodnc; shedonatedtoalgore; supremecourt; tooold
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 241-245 next last
To: benjibrowder

That means nothing. The United Methodist Church has been taken over by the liberals.


61 posted on 09/28/2005 7:22:10 PM PDT by Blood of Tyrants (G-d is not a Republican. But Satan is definitely a Democrat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: TitansAFC
Unmarried at 59, no kids, ambitious. Call me nuts, but this has social progressive written all over it.

Female, unmarried and no family at 59 screams "LIBERAL!"

62 posted on 09/28/2005 7:23:49 PM PDT by Blood of Tyrants (G-d is not a Republican. But Satan is definitely a Democrat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Paradox

"I hate to say this, but she resembles a young and far prettier version of Helen Thomas..."


Maybe you'll feel better after looking at post #17... now THAT looks more like Helen Thomas!


63 posted on 09/28/2005 7:25:02 PM PDT by Hand em their arse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: alwaysconservative

Don't know who it'll be but my last guess would be Janice Rogers Brown. I don't believe the President wants a showdown and neither does she want to be the focus of one.
And if the nominee isn't an unmistakable conservative, if he's another inkblot like Roberts, then it's time to take a hint.
(Roberts is obviously brilliant; he is not as obviously conservative.)


64 posted on 09/28/2005 7:25:14 PM PDT by Graymatter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: PilloryHillary
Harriet received both her undergraduate and law degrees from Southern Methodist University

No chance.
65 posted on 09/28/2005 7:27:28 PM PDT by July 4th (A vacant lot cancelled out my vote for Bush.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: dollar_dog

on board?

Al Gore?

Bentzen?

Looks like someone that doles out contributions depending on which way the wind blows,,, looking for that next job.


66 posted on 09/28/2005 7:29:26 PM PDT by commonguymd (My impatience is far more advanced than any known technology.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: GeneralStorm

Does she lack gravitas?


67 posted on 09/28/2005 7:30:43 PM PDT by jimfree (Freep and Ye shall find.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TitansAFC
What we know about her on key issues: Nothing. Likeliness to be a judge clearly in the mold of Thomas and Scalia like the President put his honor and reputation on the line to nominate and ONLY nominate: bascially zero.

You contradict yourself. Since the answer to the first question is "nothing," the answer to the second question can only be answered honestly as "don't know."

More importantly, this is a rumor only at this point. It really doesn't matter what this woman's credentials are. It will only matter if and when she is actually nominated.

68 posted on 09/28/2005 7:31:50 PM PDT by alnick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Finalapproach29er

What are you talking about? This is a SCOTUS nomination. Bush is the president, so he's the only one that can make an appointment.

Good grief.


69 posted on 09/28/2005 7:35:01 PM PDT by Republican Wildcat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: alnick

It's Drudge. Take with a Bucket of Salt.


70 posted on 09/28/2005 7:35:39 PM PDT by Credo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: dollar_dog

She was a Democrat until 1994?


71 posted on 09/28/2005 7:37:00 PM PDT by TruthWillWin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: GeneralStorm

I'm a big W supporter and was born and raised in Texas but a SC selection from Texas seems too chummy to me.


72 posted on 09/28/2005 7:37:05 PM PDT by plain talk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Blood of Tyrants
Yeap, but as far as "liberal" denominations go it probably has the most conservative laity. I'm predicting a conservative takeover within the next decade or so.
73 posted on 09/28/2005 7:37:07 PM PDT by bahblahbah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: Credo

Actually it is CNN. Take it with a truckload of salt.


74 posted on 09/28/2005 7:37:18 PM PDT by Republican Wildcat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: Graymatter

It will be Alice Batchelder.


75 posted on 09/28/2005 7:37:47 PM PDT by Dog (I can't give that information Chief in the open..... I demand the cone of silence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: GeneralStorm; xzins

Does she have a family? Husband? Kids?


76 posted on 09/28/2005 7:43:48 PM PDT by Dr. Eckleburg (There are very few shades of gray)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xrp
"Nah, I think it is very poor intelligence (by the end user). Whenever you place your mouse over a link, your web browser, in its lower left corner, will display where that link will take you."

That doesn't change the fact that the headline link shouldn't be that way. With regards to reading where links go, I rarely do that...what's the point? I know you would say that a link could go to some ad filled spyware bomb, but I mainly use Linux, so it doesn't matter to me lol. I suppose some people may be on 56k and want to really really make sure what sites they are going to via hyperlinks are sites they want to see because pages take so long to load, other than that, who cares.

77 posted on 09/28/2005 7:48:27 PM PDT by KoRn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: TitansAFC; xzins
Unmarried at 59, no kids

Oh, lovely. Just what the SC needs for balance.

78 posted on 09/28/2005 7:48:28 PM PDT by Dr. Eckleburg (There are very few shades of gray)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Eckleburg
Does she (Harriet) have a family? Husband? Kids?

Isn't it Ozzie, Rick, and whasisname...the other son...(Mike?)

79 posted on 09/28/2005 7:51:23 PM PDT by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: bahblahbah

Knowing President Bush's penchant for Political Five Card Texas Hold 'Em. Ms. Miers is the bluff and bump before the check.

Jack.


80 posted on 09/28/2005 7:59:43 PM PDT by Jack Deth (Knight Errant and Disemboweler of the WFTD Thread)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 241-245 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson