Skip to comments.
Darwin Goes to Church
Washington Post ^
| 9/18/2005
| Rev. Henry G. Brinton
Posted on 09/20/2005 5:35:52 PM PDT by curiosity
Most adult Sunday school classes don't raise eyebrows, but my church is planning to hold one that's sure to. It's called "Evolution for Christians," and it will be taught this winter by David Bush, a member of the church I lead, Fairfax Presbyterian. David is an articulate government retiree who has been interested in this topic for nearly two decades, teaches a class on theories of the origins of life every five years or so, and once again has really done his homework. His view is that science and religion answer two different sets of questions about creation, with science answering the "how" questions, and religion answering the "why" ones. "With a little bit of wisdom and tolerance on each side," he tells me, "I think they can complement rather than contradict each other."
(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonpost.com ...
TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial; Philosophy; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: allcrevoallthetime; christianity; creation; crevo; crevolist; crevorepublic; darwinism; enoughalready; evolution; religion; unbelief
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 441-456 next last
1
posted on
09/20/2005 5:35:53 PM PDT
by
curiosity
To: curiosity
Logic? conciliation? A zealot craves not these things.
2
posted on
09/20/2005 5:37:22 PM PDT
by
Mylo
( scientific discovery is also an occasion of worship.)
To: narby; Varda; betty boop; Alamo-Girl; PatrickHenry; marron; D-fendr; Junior; Aquinasfan; ...
Faith and Science Ping.
3
posted on
09/20/2005 5:39:50 PM PDT
by
curiosity
To: curiosity
Professing to be wise, they became fools.
4
posted on
09/20/2005 5:40:13 PM PDT
by
newgeezer
(Just my opinion, of course. Your mileage may vary.)
To: curiosity
Evolution is easy for Catholics.
God created the world.
Evolution is probably how He did it.
He directly creates our souls, dips them in flesh for awhile, and then calls them back to Himself.
Why?
Because it pleases Him.
Nothing to see here, move along.
5
posted on
09/20/2005 5:40:59 PM PDT
by
Vicomte13
(Et alors?)
To: curiosity
But the debate between evolution and intelligent design has become increasingly shrill Really? Where would that be?
6
posted on
09/20/2005 5:42:26 PM PDT
by
Coyoteman
(Is this a good tagline?)
To: curiosity
The problem with Evolution in church is that Evolution is a religion.
It is a faith-based belief system.
7
posted on
09/20/2005 5:42:39 PM PDT
by
keithtoo
(Howard Dean is a Rove plant, Rove is a NeoCon plant, NeoCons are Trilateralist plants....)
To: curiosity
In before the first 500 replies!!!
8
posted on
09/20/2005 5:43:28 PM PDT
by
Paloma_55
(Which part of "Common Sense" do you not understand???)
To: keithtoo
The problem with Evolution in church is that Evolution is a religion.
It is a faith-based belief system.
Shhhhhh..... don't want to start a 500 post debate on THIS subject. :)
9
posted on
09/20/2005 5:44:37 PM PDT
by
Paloma_55
(Which part of "Common Sense" do you not understand???)
To: Vicomte13
There's nothing uniquely Catholic about that position. There is no logical reason Protestants can't accept it too.
To: keithtoo
It is a faith-based belief system.ROTFLMAO!
11
posted on
09/20/2005 5:45:27 PM PDT
by
RadioAstronomer
(Senior member of Darwin Central)
To: curiosity
I had exactly this sort of class at a Southern Baptist church retreat sometime around 1970. There were actually religious tracts promoting this idea (that there is no conflict between science and the Bible) back in the 30's-50's, undoubtedly when my teacher back then studied.
That same church now teaches creationism. Which leads to the question, where they teaching garbage back then, or are they teaching garbage now?
12
posted on
09/20/2005 5:45:43 PM PDT
by
narby
To: Vicomte13
If you are a thinking Catholic, Evolution should not be 'easy' for you. First of all, it is a postulation, not a a proven, or even provable belief. Secondly, if their was never a Fall, then their is no need of a Savior. If we are only getting better all the time, all we have to do is wait. None of that messy Cross or Salvation stuff is needed.
13
posted on
09/20/2005 5:46:01 PM PDT
by
keithtoo
(Howard Dean is a Rove plant, Rove is a NeoCon plant, NeoCons are Trilateralist plants....)
To: keithtoo
It is a faith-based belief system. No, it's based on physical and verifiable evidence.
To: keithtoo
Yes, they have faith in replicable experiments that show that the predictions of evolution through natural selection are validated time and time again. And I have faith that nothing that the universe can show us is not part of God and part of God's plan. The universe shows us that living things pass on DNA to their progeny, that this DNA can be mutated leading to genetic diversity, and that this diversity can be selected for or against depending upon the environmental conditions. Obviously this is part of Gods plan, or it wouldn't' happen this way in life and in thousands of experiments.
15
posted on
09/20/2005 5:48:13 PM PDT
by
Mylo
( scientific discovery is also an occasion of worship.)
To: curiosity
Really? Why don't you post a picture of a current, living, intermediate biological form?
I didn't think so.
Punctuated Equilibria my @ss.
16
posted on
09/20/2005 5:48:55 PM PDT
by
keithtoo
(Howard Dean is a Rove plant, Rove is a NeoCon plant, NeoCons are Trilateralist plants....)
To: Vicomte13
Evolution is easy for Catholics those who will not take God at His word.
Genesis 2 7And the LORD God formed man of the dust of the ground
That's macro-evolution. One infinitesimal step for God. One giant leap for (unbelieving) mankind.
17
posted on
09/20/2005 5:48:59 PM PDT
by
newgeezer
(Just my opinion, of course. Your mileage may vary.)
To: keithtoo
Evolution isn't improvement. I hope you know more about theology than science.
18
posted on
09/20/2005 5:49:14 PM PDT
by
Mylo
( scientific discovery is also an occasion of worship.)
To: keithtoo
First of all, it is a postulation, not a a proven, or even provable belief. Nothing it science is ever proven. However, evolution, like other well-established scientific theories, has a mountain of evidence supporting it.
Secondly, if their was never a Fall, then their is no need of a Savior
How exactly does evolution contradict the Fall? Man evolved, God revealed himself to him, and then man rejected God. What's the problem?
To: keithtoo
If it is currently living what is it "intermediate" to?
Logic?
20
posted on
09/20/2005 5:50:34 PM PDT
by
Mylo
( scientific discovery is also an occasion of worship.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 441-456 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson