Posted on 08/08/2005 9:01:54 PM PDT by Mia T
"For the children," Jeanine or hillary? (IT'S NO CONTEST)
JEANINE'S RECORD OF ACHIEVEMENT
Jeanine Protects our Children
Jeanine is There in a Time of Need
Jeanine Protects Victims of Crime
Jeanine Provides Programs to Assist Our Most Vulnerable
Jeanine Works to Improve the Criminal Justice System for All New Yorkers
Jeanine Safeguards our Environment
Jeanine is Tough on Crime
Jeanine is a Pioneer in Law Enforcement
Jeanine Harnesses Technology
Jeanine Holds Government Accountable
Jeanine Safeguards Your Tax Dollars
Jeanine is Fiscally Responsible
|
|
|||||||||
|
Fellating Kids and clinton Degeneracy: The Revisionism Begins
"Be Liberal, Live in Ignorance and Servitude"
Liberals have always had problems figuring out causation. They believe for example that because people who smoke (sometimes) have higher rates of cancer than people who don't that smoking CAUSES cancer, worse, they believe that if people get cancer it is the fault of the "tobacco companies" (i.e., caused by the manufactures of tobacco products). They further believe that the remedy for this fault is that billions of dollars in "damages" should be transferred from the wealth of stockholders in tobacco companies to a handful of plaintiffs lawyers including the First Lady's relatives and others closely associated with the Democratic party. And they believe, apparently, that if young people are now experimenting with sex at early ages and with more profoundly explicit practices than in past years, and that if the President of the United States decides to enroll a young intern in rendition of such services to his middle aged libido resultantly staining both her dress and America's reputation, that a spontaneous wave of teenage sex experimentation, sucked (sorry) the poor middle aged chief executive into its vortex.
Deducing causation in most events takes deliberate, focused, thought, insight, and a disciplined intelligence that doesnt skip foundational indoctrination (aka actually studying in school). Causation of the diseases associated with cancer is highly complex and to a large degree still unknown. That smoking is probably not healthy for you is well known. That a middle aged chief executive, Yale Law School graduate, former professor of Constitutional Law and State Attorney General should be responsible and accountable for his own actions including HIS perjury and obstruction of justice would seem axiomatic to all but a liberal who has the capacity to adopt causationally convenient theories based solely on tangential proximity to the event under examination rather than through any rational analysis of the importance or significance of the asserted cause to the event. Thus, "guns" are used in some murders therefore, to a liberal all "guns" should be either banned or kept in locked safes with trigger locks so as to disarm the law abiding public and eviscerate their legally recognized right to effective self defense.
Quite simply, one has to be pretty stupid or very corrupt or both to be a liberal, at least and for sure to be a Clinton supporter. But it is worse than that, one also has to deny the importance of human consciousness and free will. That is, a Clinton defending liberal apparently believes that childhood psychic trauma, teenage sex trends (remarkably and largely only rampant among the social classes targeted by liberals for social intervention for the past 40 years) and the power of "addiction" which used to be considered merely "habituation" in more stalwart times, are more significant than free will in determining human conduct.
by Gail Wynand
BUSH: "I will not wait on events, while dangers gather."
|
Sending Americans into battle is the most profound decision a President can make. The technologies of war have changed; the risks and suffering of war have not. For the brave Americans who bear the risk, no victory is free from sorrow. This nation fights reluctantly, because we know the cost and we dread the days of mourning that always come.
|
|
The Real Danger of a Fake President:
Post-9/11 Reconsideration of The Placebo President
Sylvia Plath
he placebo effect immediately came to mind as I listened to Shelby Steele, a research fellow at the Hoover Institution,debunk the following pernicious spin intended to save clinton.
To wit: A proven felon and utter reprobate can remain president; clinton can be a failed human being but a good president.
The error in these statements arises, says Steele, from the belief that virtuousness is separate from personal responsibility so that one's virtuousness as an individual is determined by one's political positions on issues rather than on whether or not in one's personal life there is a consistency and a responsibility.
Steele's contention is that this compartmentalization, rather than being the amazing advantage the clintons would have us believe, in fact, spills toxicity into, corrupts, the culture.
If mere identification with good policies is what makes one virtuous then those policies become, what Steele calls, iconographic, that is to say they just represent virtuousness. They don't necessarily do virtuous things.
If clinton's semantic parsing strips meaning from our words, clinton's iconographic policies strip meaning from our society, systematically deconstructing our society as a democracy. . .
I would take Shelby Steele's thesis one step further. I maintain that iconographic policy functions like a placebo, producing a real, physiological and social effects.
The placebo effect is, after all, the brain's triumph over reality. Expectation alone can produce powerful physiological results. The placebo effect was, at one time, an evolutionary advantage: act now, think later
bill clinton is the paradigmatic Placebo President. Placebo is Latin for "I shall please." And please he does doling out sham treatments, iconographs, with abandon. To please, to placate, to numb, to deflect. Ultimately to showcase his imagined virtue. Or to confute his genuine vice.
clinton will dispense sugar pills (or bombs) at the drop of a high-heeled shoe... or at the hint of high treason...
clinton's charlatanry mimics that of primitive medicine. Through the 1940s, doctors had little effective medicine to offer so they deliberately attempted to induce the placebo response.
The efficaciousness of today's medicines does not diminish the power of the placebo. A recent review of placebo-controlled studies found that placebos and genuine treatments are often equally effective. If you expect to get better, you will.
Which brings me back to the original question: Can clinton be a failed human being but a good president?
Clearly he cannot. These two propositions are mutually exclusive. clinton's fundamental failure is a complete lack of integrity. He has violated his covenant with the American people.
Because clinton has destroyed his moral authority as a leader, he can no longer function even as a quack; the placebo effect is gone.
And so the Placebo President must now go, too.
They say that the clear focus of American policy was to discourage the state sponsorship of terrorism. So persuading Khartoum to expel Bin Laden was in itself counted as a clear victory. The administration was "delighted".
Bin Laden took off from Khartoum on May 18 in a chartered C-130 plane with 150 of his followers, including his wives. He was bound for Jalalabad in eastern Afghanistan. On the way the plane refuelled in the Gulf state of Qatar, which has friendly relations with Washington, but he was allowed to proceed unhindered.
Barely a month later, on June 25, a 5,000lb truck bomb ripped apart the front of Khobar Towers, a US military housing complex in Dhahran, Saudi Arabia. The explosion killed 19 American servicemen. Bin Laden was immediately suspected...
bill clinton, State of Union Speech, January 27, 2000
Among the comments clinton made in presence of Secret Service agents:
After the Monica Lewinsky story broke, however, clinton toned down his rhetoric and behavior in front of his Secret Service agents, but those who guarded the president say enough of them saw and heard things which could be damaging to clinton.
Turnover In clinton's Secret Service Detail
Why does the press continue to ignore the Juanita Broaddrick story? Richard Gere stunned fellow liberals Monday by suggesting that President Bush is doing a better job of fighting AIDS than President Bill Clinton did.
Introduced by Sharon Stone at a fund-raiser at Cipriani 42nd Street for the American Foundation for AIDS Research, the "Chicago" star hailed Bush for his State of the Union proposal to contribute $15 billion toward the AIDS battle in Africa and the Caribbean. Gere then addressed the track record of Bush's predecessor in the White House.
"I'm sorry, Sen. [Hillary] Clinton, but your husband did nothing about AIDS for eight years," Gere said.
GERE TAKES ON BILL
copyright Mia T 2001
How a Rapist can be a Policy Feminist
placebo effect n.
The boot in the face, the brute
Brute heart of a brute like you.
'Highest That Anyone Can Remember'
NY Daily News | 2/5/03
|
WHY MISSUS CLINTON IS DANGEROUS FOR THE CHILDREN, FOR AMERICA, FOR THE WORLD madhillary.com (coming soon) madhillary.blogspot.com COPYRIGHT MIA T 2005 |
ping
ping
"LUCINDA FRANKS: I think you're wrong because, after about two years of -- of working on this, you know, on and off, I think the president -- that the teenage culture caused the president's behavior in the way he behaved in -- with the oral sex."
Note: Lucinda Franks is the wife of NY County (MANHATTAN) DA Robert Morgenthau.
What are some upstate papers. I'm not in NY but can write a few. Being in Canada may help in having them printed as 'international' interest has a value.
bttt
Anyone who crosses her (usually) ends up very dead of mysterious causes or creative accidents.
bumped and bookmarked (wow)
f missus clinton
is serious
about keeping
pornography
downloads
from our kids,
she
and that... husband... of hers
will upload themselves
straightaway
to
Chappaqua...
or wherever...
and stay clear
of the Oval Office
and the public square
forever.
LOL. You have a future in tawdry romance novels Mia, as well as cutting edge political commentary.
How interesting.
This useful idiot was at the forefront of the clintons' revisionist efforts. Hard to imagine that she took on the clintons' oral sex problem of her own free will. And on O'Reilly, no less.
Can't you just see missus clinton 'assigning' that topic to lucinda?
They both s-ck, although at least Pirro would caucus with the GOP and vote with us 40% of the time.
I'd love to take credit for that, but it's the work of Gail Wynand. ;)
fyi
Great info. Thanks!
http://www.gop.com/MultiMedia/VideoPlayer.aspx?ID=1005&TypeID=2
As much as I hate the thought of Hillary being elected to ANY office, isn't Pirro pro-abortion? Is that "for the children," too? If so, I couldn't vote for either of them. The GOP needs to wake up, big time. If they send up a pro-abort as the nominee in 2008, we're in big trouble.
We have a GREAT alternative to Hillary vs. Hillary lite:
2- Please explain to former U.S. Senator Al DAmato (R-NY) that he was unelectable and should have stepped aside for electable RINO Jacob Javits. You also might want to explain this concept to former U.S. Senator James Buckley (R-NY)
3- An alleged mob lawyer husband is the EXACT reason why Pirro s attempts to go after the criminal Clinton corruption will backfire as the media skews her own family scandals. Cox and Spencer look like saints in comparison.
4- Pirro, as Westchester County District Attorney who has NEVER been involved in campaigns before, is MUCH better suited to run for the OPEN seat of Attorney General of New York (where the NY GOP desperately NEEDS a credible candidate), than try to seek the U.S. Senate as an entry level position. Cox and Spencer are far more familiar with politics being a bloodsport.
5- The idea that Jeanine Pirro is a household name in NY with star power is pretty silly. Far more people have heard of Richard Nixons son in law than a district attorney from Westchester. And the fact that Mayor John Spencer, a conservative Republican, is venerated in the largely Democrat suburban area of Yonkers, gives him far more star power than Hillary. As a beloved Mayor and decorated Vietnam War vet, he is the very much the suburban version of the Rudy and the kind of saavy pit bull who can put the Clintons in their place on the campaign trail.
HILLARY: A 30-YEAR CAREER ATTACKING AMERICAN TROOPS
Hillary dishonors our troops and Voted YES on granting normal trade relations status to Vietnam. In Washington to begin forming a campaign team, John Spencer said Clinton's questioning of Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld at a Senate Armed Services hearing Thursday constituted a "thinly veiled attack" on President Bush and was another example of how Democratic rhetoric on the war is dividing the country. Clinton, a Democrat, asked Rumsfeld to repudiate White House Deputy Chief of Staff Karl Rove's remarks this week that liberals are not tough enough on America's enemies. She said the remarks, made at a Conservative Party dinner in New York City, were "insulting" and "disturbing" to people like herself who had "legitimate questions" about the administration's conduct of the war while supporting it. She says we all love our troops. But then to be silent when politicians like (Sen.) Dick Durbin, Howard Dean and Ted Kennedy and John Kerry attack the president, that's really aiding and comforting the enemy," Spencer said. Spencer said he was particularly incensed that Clinton brought up the Vietnam War and its divisiveness while questioning Rumsfeld. Clinton said that she was old enough to remember how deeply divided the country was "and never want to see that again." But Spencer took issue, saying that as a Vietnam veteran he was "appalled that she would raise the fact that our nation was divided during Vietnam, and then proceed to divide us further today." This is just another example of Senator Clinton's attempts to have it both ways; She voted for the war in Iraq, and then bashes President Bush about the war every opportunity she gets. It should have occurred to Hillary that her remarks demoralize the troops, since the vast majority believe in the Iraq cause.
" I've always run for, and with, both Republican AND
Conservative Party support. That's how I've won before and that's how we need to win
again. If you're like me you're tired of watching our party lose in New York. We haven't
won anything new in New York State for the past 11 years. Instead we have lost our US
Senate seat, our Attorney General, Congressional seats, State Senate and Assembly seats
, County Executives in Nassau, Suffolk and Westchester and too many other races. Why?
Because some Republicans have forgotten who we are and what we stand for. New York
Republicans have won when they proudly run on our issues and conservative Republican
values. That's how Ronald Reagan, Al D'Amato, Jim Buckley, and even George Pataki
all first got elected. Liberal Republicans just can't win in New York anymore. And they
certainly can't out liberal Sen. Clinton. I'm proud of my record as Mayor of Yonkers. We
cut the income tax surcharge by 2/3rds and the real estate transfer tax by 2/3rds as well
and we kept property taxes low with the first year with no property tax increase in 30
years. We brought back hundreds of millions in investments and thousands of jobs. We
took back our schools and housing from an out of control federal judge. We cut crime.
And in our state's 4th largest city, Yonkers, a Democrat city, running as a Conservative
Republican, I won twice by landslides. But some misguided Republican leaders think we
need to nominate someone who holds the same positions as Hillary Clinton on some
important issues. I think they're wrong. That's why we've been losing ground for 11 years
and if they have their way, the core of our party will have no choice and stay home and
we'll lose again."
-- Mayor John Spencer of Yonkers
Pirro is a pro-choice woman who even backs Medicaid funding for abortion and a supporter of gun control, affirmative action AND gay civil unions.
-- The Hill | 6/27/05 | Dick Morris, Quoted in Post #37, by Mia T
I'm pro-life. I was adopted and didn't meet my birth mother until I was 32.You can be sure I'll do a lot more to protect life. I will work to end illegal immigration. My positions
cut taxes to create jobs. New Yorkers pay too much already. I strongly support our troops in Iraq and I support the strongest measures to win the war on terror. Last year I traveled with fellow Vietnam Vets to the Democrat convention in Boston to publicly criticize John Kerry's liberal policies. These are the kind of issues I'll raise and win on in New York.
-- Mayor John Spencer
Remember - Just say NO to RINOs!
Have to say, Mia ..... that's beautiful!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.