Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

NY TIMES QUESTIONED LEGALITY OF JUDGE ROBERTS ADOPTIONS; SUPREME COURT NOMINEE 'DISAPPOINTED'
Drudge Report ^ | 8/7/05 | Matt Drudge

Posted on 08/07/2005 5:21:51 PM PDT by wagglebee

Supreme Court Nominee John Roberts expressed great disappointment after learning the NEW YORK TIMES was poking around for details on his adopted children, sources tell the DRUDGE REPORT.

The DRUDGE REPORT first revealed how TIMES investigative reporter Glen Justice questioned if the adoption records for the Roberts children, Josephine and Jack, ages 5 and 4, would be made available for examination.

TIMES editors were determined to find any possible legal irregularities in the adoptions, insiders claim.

FOXNEWS's Brit Hume reported late last week how the TIMES has been asking lawyers that specialize in adoption cases for advice on how to get into the sealed court records:

"Sources familiar with the matter tell FOXNEWS that at least one lawyer turned the TIMES down flat, saying that any effort to pry into adoption case records, which are always sealed, would be reprehensible.

A senior editor at the TIMES lashed out at this space over the revealtion:

"The DRUDGE REPORT is wrong, overwrought and a gross misrepresentation of what has happened," blasted the paper's senior editor in a press release.

But the editor did confess: "Our reporters made initial inquiries about the adoptions... They did so with great care, understanding the sensitivity of the issue."

Texas Sen. Kay Bailey Hutchison called the newspaper's actions "reprehensible," saying the inquiry crossed the "fine line between legitimate background inquiries and invasion of privacy."

The National Council For Adoption issued the following statement:

“NCFA denounces, in the strongest possible terms, the shocking decision of the New York Times to investigate the adoption records of Justice John Roberts’ two young children. The adoption community is outraged that, for obviously political reasons, the Times has targeted the very private circumstances, motivations, and processes by which the Roberts became parents.

"The adoption histories of four- and five-year old children have no bearing whatsoever on the suitability of Justice Roberts to serve on the U.S. Supreme Court – or in any other position, for that matter."

Developing...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: adoption; drudge; johnroberts; mediabias; newyorktimes; nyt; robertsadoption; scotus
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-140 next last
The left is absolutely despicable.
1 posted on 08/07/2005 5:21:52 PM PDT by wagglebee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

Let's move to find out the paternity of Chelsea. Let's insist on DNA tests, etc. I mean, it goes to Hillary's honesty, right? If the Roberts situation goes further, I'm serious about this.


2 posted on 08/07/2005 5:23:53 PM PDT by Hildy ("When you want something you've never had, you've got to do something you've never done.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

The true colours of the left come out right here. They would've torn that family apart if it would've earned them a political victory. They would've had those kids taken away from their father if it would've made a good headline to use against conservatives.


3 posted on 08/07/2005 5:24:13 PM PDT by DefiantZERO
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

Dispicable is a nice way to put it. The words that could actually be used to describe them aren't fit to print.


4 posted on 08/07/2005 5:24:38 PM PDT by vpintheak (Liberal = The antithesis of Freedom and Patriotism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

It's not Chelsea Clinton so it's fair game. /sarcasm off/

(I fully agree with you)


5 posted on 08/07/2005 5:24:54 PM PDT by netmilsmom (God blessed me with a wonderful husband.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

Can you imagine the outcry from the left if someone on the right had tried to pull this same trick. They would get "roved" to death.


6 posted on 08/07/2005 5:25:22 PM PDT by Jeff Gordon (Recall Barbara Boxer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hildy

Might as well check into kerry's mares, I mean, daughters.


7 posted on 08/07/2005 5:25:40 PM PDT by new cruelty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: netmilsmom

The White House should get on this pre-emptively, so the first things that the average American hears of this scandal comes from us, not the enemy.


8 posted on 08/07/2005 5:25:57 PM PDT by California Patriot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee
But the editor did confess: "Our reporters made initial inquiries about the adoptions... They did so with great care, understanding the sensitivity of the issue."

Why!!!!!
9 posted on 08/07/2005 5:25:59 PM PDT by TheRedSoxWinThePennant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: new cruelty

Nah, sKerry's daughters are as goofy looking as he is.


10 posted on 08/07/2005 5:26:44 PM PDT by wagglebee ("We are ready for the greatest achievements in the history of freedom." -- President Bush, 1/20/05)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee
It isn't about the fact that the children were adopted "illegally." The real story the liberals are working on is about the fact that his children are white.

Hide and watch. If you think this is disgusting gutter politics, wait until you see what the good liberals "question" next.

11 posted on 08/07/2005 5:26:49 PM PDT by Reactionary
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

I think the Slimes is disappointed that the children weren't aborted instead.


12 posted on 08/07/2005 5:28:49 PM PDT by johniegrad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

Good point. Probably better to start with kerry. There is animal husbandry going on somewhere in that gene pool.


13 posted on 08/07/2005 5:29:17 PM PDT by new cruelty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Reactionary

On the other hand, if the left is sinking this low this early, it means that they are desperate because they don't have anything on Roberts.


14 posted on 08/07/2005 5:29:24 PM PDT by wagglebee ("We are ready for the greatest achievements in the history of freedom." -- President Bush, 1/20/05)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee
I'm giving Drudge a call tonight to thank him for the heads up on the NYT story.

His preemptive strike followed by Brits and the blogosphere stopped them in their tracks.

15 posted on 08/07/2005 5:29:27 PM PDT by mware (Now we know why the NYT didn't have time to cover AIR AMERIKA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hildy
Let's move to find out the paternity of Chelsea.

Yeah, she sure has Web Hubbel's lower lip.


16 posted on 08/07/2005 5:29:49 PM PDT by ElkGroveDan (I'm sick and tired of being sicked and tired!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee
The Slimes has really crossed the line this time! Can anyone do an investigation on the reporter? Are his legal files open to scrutiny?
17 posted on 08/07/2005 5:29:52 PM PDT by Road Warrior ‘04 (Kill 'em til they're dead! Then, kill 'em again!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee
I don't know how their presses remain standing after people read this garbage.

They are truly cursed people.
18 posted on 08/07/2005 5:30:32 PM PDT by A CA Guy (God Bless America, God bless and keep safe our fighting men and women.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Reactionary

With Freedom Of The Press comes enormous responsibility and the NYSlimes has abused and spit on that responsibility. I know, I know, that's not a shock.


19 posted on 08/07/2005 5:30:44 PM PDT by Fudd Fan (fiat voluntas Tua)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: new cruelty
somebody peed in that gene pool.
20 posted on 08/07/2005 5:31:19 PM PDT by Fudd Fan (fiat voluntas Tua)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-140 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson