Posted on 07/28/2005 1:19:30 PM PDT by smoothsailing
Jane Fonda's second coming
Cal Thomas
July 28, 2005
We've all seen them: aging athletes, beyond their prime, trying to squeeze out one more fight, or one more season, but failing to bring back their glory days.
That seems an appropriate analogy for the return of Jane Fonda to the political stage. Having made her first movie in many years ("Monster-in-Law") that was a box office success, Fonda apparently thinks her new visibility gives her a certain credibility to comment on the Iraq war.
She has announced plans for an anti-war bus tour next March. Why is she waiting so long? The war might be over by then. The bus will run on vegetable oil. How 1960s! Will the riders grow their hair long, smoke pot, dress in tie-dyed T-shirts and sing "Blowin' in the Wind"? Fonda says she will be joined by her daughter and some families of Iraq War veterans. She says veterans came up to her during her book tour, encouraging her to protest the war.
In her memoir, "My Life So Far," and on numerous interview shows, Fonda has repeatedly apologized for going to North Vietnam in 1972 where she sat on an anti-aircraft gun and said things critical of her country that encouraged the enemy to fight on.
The North Vietnamese used her comments as propaganda in an effort to demoralize American troops and diminish the resolve of prisoners of war. Just what does she think will be the result of her forthcoming bus tour if not to encourage the terrorists and insurgents now fighting Americans and Iraqis in Iraq?
With high privilege also goes increased responsibility. If youthful indiscretion is an excuse she has used to explain her anti-war activities more than 30 years ago, what explanation will she have in her now mature years - temporary insanity?
"I have not taken a stand on any war since Vietnam," Fonda was quoted as saying. "I carry a lot of baggage from that." She certainly does, which makes it all the more perplexing why she is intent on adding even more baggage. It's peculiar that Fonda only protests what Americans do to resist evil, but she led no protests against Saddam Hussein's murderous regime that practiced evil. Why is that?
Jane Fonda might be described as one who is "always learning, but never able to acknowledge the truth," as the Bible she once read and claimed to believe says about people of shifting convictions and allegiances (see 2 Timothy 3:7). Except that she does not learn, much less arrive at any truth.
When Fonda announced she had been born again by accepting Christ as her savior, I investigated and concluded she was genuinely serious about her new faith. I wrote a column urging people not to judge or condemn her. Sadly, I must now write that by her own words, Jane Fonda has moved away from that initial faith into a universalism in which she says there are many ways to God and Jesus is not the only path. She has denied the essence of Christianity. One cannot truly be called a Christian unless one believes the uniqueness of the life, atoning death and resurrection of Christ.
When Jane Fonda protested the Vietnam War there were just three television networks and few media outlets for those who opposed her actions. We are now in a new media environment. While the major networks may practice their usual celebrity suck-up, cable television and talk radio are not about to give her a free pass. Look for Vietnam veterans still angry at "Hanoi Jane" to turn out along the bus route to protest her protest, then and now. It could get ugly.
Jane Fonda has every right to freedom of speech, but so do those who believe she caused enough harm in the Vietnam War that they will not allow her to escape accountability or undermine America's efforts in this one. America survived its pullout from Vietnam. It cannot survive a similar outcome in this war. That's the big difference that Jane Fonda doesn't understand.
©2005 Tribune Media Services
HA HA HA LOL,Potlatch
I Like IT!!!
LOL, I've got an endless supply, just mention a subject! Also have an endless supply of spyware!!
LOL, just occurred to me - maybe that's how Calvin takes his bath!
These kind of people just aren't facing the realities of what the world is facing right now. They just don't accept terrorism for what it is.
If they think someone like Clinton, Gore or Kerry could be doing a better job at fighting this they are living in La-la land.
The reality is that we all may have to live a much more modest life in the years to come and it isn't Bush's fault!
Well, we were hit fivre times when Clinton and Gore were in office, and the only think Slick Willy was chasing, was Monica around the Oval Office desk. Gore was irrelevant.
I to am amazed at dopes like this. You're right, this idiot is lost and living in La-La-land!
her husbands have all used and abused her, yet repeatedly she took up whatever beliefs these men had and followed them until ultimately she was discarded.
This is the story according to HER. She's looking for sympathy, to be the victim. It's a typical liberal ploy.
'used and abused her'
oh, and her father was MEAN to her...so she says...
used and abused....the woman doesn't KNOW the situation so many women have where it is almost impossible to walk away without being killed...
she should STHU.
Their opposition to capitalism is their creed, thus they must oppose any action which would tend to advance capitalism or tend to expand American power.
"I have not taken a stand on any war since Vietnam,"
Viet Nam was fought to prevent the spread of communism, therefore the Jane Fondas of the world were opposed. The Iraq war will advance American power and influence, but more importantly will tend to make the American capitalist system "safer", thus Fonda and others must oppose it.
They fancy themselves "citizens of the world", they have no country, but true citizens of the world could not possibly oppose capitalism and embrace the misery brought by socialism.
That is a brilliant graphic!
http://www.strangepolitics.com
beware the pop-ups, tho...
As an Nam combat vet,Fonda's treason is my focus.
But when you get right down to it,the left is engaged in a slower form of something akin to treason,I suppose.
I agree,we need to FReep her and her minions in every city she appears,to show our support to our men and women in the military.
We can not let this happen again!!!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.