Skip to comments.
Post Goes for the Jugular of Roberts' Children - (how tacky, but how predictable!)
TRADITIONAL VALUES COALITION.ORG ^
| JULY 25, 2005
| Editor, TVC
Posted on 07/25/2005 5:50:56 PM PDT by CHARLITE
Washington, DC Traditional Values Coalition Executive Director Andrea Lafferty complained today that an article in the Washington Post about the clothes worn by Supreme Court nominee John Roberts children was unfair and disappointing.
Mrs. Lafferty said in a letter sent to Post Editor Leonard Downie, Jr. that the Post has now set a new pecking order for unfair journalism which ignores substance and slides right into chortling about form.
If you cant come up with something disgusting about the actual nominee or his wife then rough-up the kids some and see what happens, Mrs. Lafferty said today.
Post fashion writer Robin Givhan complained about the nostalgic costuming of the children at the Presidents announcement
Just when it looked like there was an opportunity for a substantive debate over Mr. Roberts qualification for the Supreme Court, the Post drags it down to your mother dresses you funny school yard banter.
Maybe the cynics over at the Post are not impressed with the President or the White House but a family about to see their father nominated by the President of the United States for Americas highest court will probably want to dress-up for the occasion. Most Americans would understand what the Post views as some sort of cynical ploy and deception.
There are clothes you wear to the playground and clothes you wear to meet the President, Mrs. Roberts and her adorable children understand that which has apparently eluded the Post.
Lets raise the bar on this debate back to where it is the nominee who is given a vigorous public examination. And lets leave the rest of the family alone.
TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events; Philosophy; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: announcement; artifact; bush; bushhaters; children; clothing; critic; fashioncritic; johngroberts; johnroberts; leonarddownie; mediabias; nominee; partisanmediashill; partisanmediashills; post; robingivhan; scotus; tvc; washington; whitehouse; wp
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 141-152 next last
To: CHARLITE
Maybe they should have had their nipples pierced for the occasion
21
posted on
07/25/2005 6:21:54 PM PDT
by
txroadhawg
(Don't believe any statistics unless you made them up yourself)
To: CHARLITE
The liberal swine hate all good things. They hate all decency. They hate decent people.
The fact that the children looked respectable is enough to send these degenerates into a frenzy.
To: CHARLITE
The left would have been so very overjoyed if those two beautiful children would have been aborted.
23
posted on
07/25/2005 6:23:58 PM PDT
by
fish hawk
(hollow points were made to hold pig lard)
To: txroadhawg
24
posted on
07/25/2005 6:24:33 PM PDT
by
Huntress
(Possession really is nine tenths of the law.)
To: CHARLITE
Yeah well, consider the source. Then you'll never be surprised.
25
posted on
07/25/2005 6:24:33 PM PDT
by
ChildOfThe60s
(If you can remember the 60s......you weren't really there.)
To: txroadhawg
26
posted on
07/25/2005 6:24:37 PM PDT
by
Huntress
(Possession really is nine tenths of the law.)
To: konaice
Thanks for posting that picture. It looks to me as if they wore their "Easter" duds for the occasion. What is so awful about that. I think they look cute as buttons.
To: CHARLITE
The irony of a dowdy skank, as the arbiter of it's fashion section, is lost on the Washington Post.
28
posted on
07/25/2005 6:25:22 PM PDT
by
CaptainK
To: CHARLITE
IMO Robin Givhan just doesn't know any better.
29
posted on
07/25/2005 6:25:32 PM PDT
by
mountainfolk
(God bless President George Bush)
To: gidget7
" I even heard a newscaster, though I think it was FOX, say they were dressed reminiscent of the John Kennedy family."
Just as bad a comment/observation; but Fox News has it's Libs for sure.
30
posted on
07/25/2005 6:27:07 PM PDT
by
cricket
(Just say NO U.N.)
To: CHARLITE
The source is the source
of course of course;
And no one can talk to the source,
of course.
Unless, of course,
The name of the source
Has "Freeper" in its name.
WHOOOOHOOOO
31
posted on
07/25/2005 6:28:44 PM PDT
by
bannie
(The government which robs Peter to pay Paul can always depend upon the support of Paul.)
To: Peach
some here on the far right, are acting just as dispicably
To: Cecily
Like this
33
posted on
07/25/2005 6:29:59 PM PDT
by
KosmicKitty
(Well... There you go again!)
To: KosmicKitty
The fashion critic in all her glory. LOL!
34
posted on
07/25/2005 6:31:17 PM PDT
by
Cecily
To: CHARLITE
Post fashion writer Robin Givhan complained about the nostalgic costuming of the children They were adorable, and reminiscent of Caroline and John-John.
Imagine if these two had been children of a RAT nominee. It would have been Camelot revisited.
35
posted on
07/25/2005 6:31:44 PM PDT
by
mombonn
(¡Viva Bush/Cheney!)
To: fish hawk
Those beautiful children were adopted instead of aborted. Thank God!!
What I don't understand is how Dubya kept a straight face while little Jack did his dance.
36
posted on
07/25/2005 6:32:44 PM PDT
by
ShowMeMom
(America: The home of the free because of the brave.)
To: CHARLITE
but the Post's critic, Robin Givhan, used a buzz word - "NOSTALGIC" Miss Givhan also had a case of the vapors over John Bolton's hair.
And surely you recall her vicious comments about Katherine Harris' makeup and wardrobe.
Givhan is a shallow fashion critic who finds fault with one's politics...
37
posted on
07/25/2005 6:33:02 PM PDT
by
okie01
(The Mainstream Media: IGNORANCE ON PARADE)
To: CHARLITE
I thought the boy looked ridiculous. Shorts for a televised meeting with the President?!
38
posted on
07/25/2005 6:34:37 PM PDT
by
Sloth
(History's greatest monsters: Hitler, Stalin, Mao & Durbin)
To: Felis_irritable
I wish the little boy had been helped to tone it downFor Heaven's sake, it was 9:00 p.m. - the kids were probably up waaaay past their bedtime, after a veeeeeery long day.
39
posted on
07/25/2005 6:35:19 PM PDT
by
mombonn
(¡Viva Bush/Cheney!)
To: CHARLITE
If the only thing they can find "wrong" with John G. Roberts, Jr. is the "nostalgic" style of his children's clothing, then Judge Roberts should be approved by acclamation tomorrow morning.Lots of people on this very site were carping about the very same thing.
40
posted on
07/25/2005 6:36:02 PM PDT
by
Howlin
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 141-152 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson