Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Sen. Boxer Calls Nomination of Supreme Court Justice " an Extraordinary Circumstance"
Fox News

Posted on 07/19/2005 11:33:16 AM PDT by fedupjohn

Senator Barbara Boxer appearing on Fox News this afternoon was asked about the 'Gang of Seven' deal not to Filibuster nominees unless it is Extra-ordinary circumstances; declared that "with the right to privacy and Roe v Wade on the table this is an Extra-ordinary circumstance and the Filibuster is on the table".

Well people they just moved the goal posts.


TOPICS: Front Page News; Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: 109th; boxer; constitutionaloption; filibuster; liberalwhiner; loonyleft; nuclearoption; obstructionistdems; scotus
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 201-218 next last
To: fedupjohn

Clear the decks and open the microphones. Give the Dimwits 24/7 coverage, and watch them self-destruct. Popcorn at the ready; this is going to get good, quick.


121 posted on 07/19/2005 12:04:25 PM PDT by thelastvirgil (AKA thelastabu)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Eric in the Ozarks
You must see something in Frist that he's failed to display to date. Every time he's pressed, he folds up like a clothes hamper.

Too harsh. He is faced with a unique situation with a minority willing to destroy the Senate and the country to get their way. He tried to work it out bloodlessly until he realized that was impossible. He was ready to pull the trigger last time when the rug was pulled from under him by the seditious seven.

There are no fig leaf now for the "moderates". It is ready, aim, fire and he will.

122 posted on 07/19/2005 12:04:52 PM PDT by Mind-numbed Robot (Not all that needs to be done needs to be done by the government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Mind-numbed Robot
He was ready to pull the trigger last time when the rug was pulled from under him by the seditious seven.

Where will they stand now?

123 posted on 07/19/2005 12:05:50 PM PDT by Pearls Before Swine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 122 | View Replies]

To: Pearls Before Swine

Your screen name is apropo for what the agreement was in the 1st place.


124 posted on 07/19/2005 12:07:10 PM PDT by Sam's Army (Blues Brothers: Chelsea, Linfield, Rangers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies]

To: fedupjohn
[Boxer] declared that "with the right to privacy and Roe v Wade on the table this is an Extra-ordinary circumstance and the Filibuster is on the table".

Big Surprise here??

The Dems are digging in on Roe v Wade as though they were the Russians digging in at Stalingrad.

Why the hell then did moronic Republicans courtesy Green-Light Clinton's rabid pro-abortion SC candidates (Breyer, Bader-Ginsberg) when there will NEVER be any reciprocity toward pro-life SC candidates??

And who was the Dem who called this a "war"??

D@mn right -- it is. Dubya and the GOP had better recognize that declaration and shove rabid pro-lifers up the Dems' wazoo. F'em.

125 posted on 07/19/2005 12:07:58 PM PDT by F16Fighter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pearls Before Swine

"Where will they stand now?"


After O'Connor resigned, Warner said the nuclear option is still on the table. Graham said he will support a rule change if needed. McCain said the nominee will get up or down vote. I've heard nothing from DeWine.


126 posted on 07/19/2005 12:08:30 PM PDT by katieanna
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies]

To: frogjerk
It was never a matter of IF, it was just a matter of WHEN!

Correct. Just another, "It depends on what the meaning of "is" is."

127 posted on 07/19/2005 12:09:02 PM PDT by Mind-numbed Robot (Not all that needs to be done needs to be done by the government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: fedupjohn

This si suprising how?


128 posted on 07/19/2005 12:09:56 PM PDT by TXBSAFH (The pursuit of life, liberty, and higher tax revenue (amended by the supreme 5).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: katieanna; All
"Even McCain said SCOTUS nominee will get up & down vote."

That was then, what will McVain say when the chips are down...I trust him as far as I can throw him. And that ain't very far.

129 posted on 07/19/2005 12:10:16 PM PDT by el_texicano
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: fedupjohn

I would like to take this opportunity to thank my senator -- DeWine -- FOR NOTHING!! You no-good RINO sellout (along with that weeping girlie-man, RINOvich)!


130 posted on 07/19/2005 12:10:17 PM PDT by Polyxene (For where God built a church, there the Devil would also build a chapel - Martin Luther)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fedupjohn

Babs is a shrill shill. I'd start to get worried if she was neutral toward anyone to the right of Ginsberg.

The goal posts are in the same place they have been throughout Bush's Presidency.


131 posted on 07/19/2005 12:10:32 PM PDT by GoLightly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Heartofsong83
What happens if the vote is, say, 59-35 with 6 not voting? That is over 60%, can the filibuster be stopped on that?

No, it takes 60 affirmative votes to invoke cloture.

132 posted on 07/19/2005 12:11:12 PM PDT by So Cal Rocket (Proud Member: Internet Pajama Wearers for Truth)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: Polyxene

When do they go up for re-election? Maybe you should try to infiltrate the Democratic race with a conservative Zell Miller-like DINO and turn the tables by fooling people? (a conservative Democrat vs. a liberal Republican)


133 posted on 07/19/2005 12:12:08 PM PDT by Heartofsong83
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 130 | View Replies]

To: fedupjohn
Now who didn't predict this?

I tell ya, those Democrats have lost all guile.

134 posted on 07/19/2005 12:12:10 PM PDT by thoughtomator (Abortion kills liberals)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fedupjohn

Lord, God,

could you PLEASE, Boxerface right into oblivion from public life?

Making her as silent in public life

as all the murdered infants she likes to multiply are silent in public life, would be wonderful.


135 posted on 07/19/2005 12:12:41 PM PDT by Quix (GOD'S LOVE IS INCREDIBLE . . . BUT MUST BE RECEIVED TO . . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: So Cal Rocket

Likewise, if the Constitutional Option is brought in, a 49-48 vote for closure would keep the filibuster going?


136 posted on 07/19/2005 12:12:52 PM PDT by Heartofsong83
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 132 | View Replies]

To: finnman69

I dunno....Al Franken does it for me, but she's definitely up there in the top 5.


137 posted on 07/19/2005 12:13:05 PM PDT by anniegetyourgun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: CdMGuy

I think that's a good start.

Both orifi stink to low hell.

Their output is exceedingly similar if not identical.

I wonder what meds she takes at night to be able to sleep with herself.


138 posted on 07/19/2005 12:14:28 PM PDT by Quix (GOD'S LOVE IS INCREDIBLE . . . BUT MUST BE RECEIVED TO . . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: gridlock
I say we take off and nuke the whole site from orbit. It's the only way to be sure...

All right, we waste 'em. 'No offense'...

139 posted on 07/19/2005 12:15:05 PM PDT by Christian4Bush (The modern Democratic Party: Attacking our defenders and defending our attackers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: fedupjohn

Why is it considered wrong and in bad form to question a state circuit judge, like the one down in Florida, one George Greer, who sided with Michael Schiavo in that tragic case. Indeed liberals, who usually side with federal intervention in such cases as Roe vs. Wade and civil rights for blacks, are suddenly advocates of federalism, or the system of states' rights.

Why is it wrong to call for judge Greer's impeachment but not wrong to practice what I like to call selective impeachment, that is, having a pro-abortion litmus test to simply dismiss any prospective judicial nominee who is not liberal enough?


140 posted on 07/19/2005 12:16:28 PM PDT by drama queen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 201-218 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson