Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Fox News reporting that Sandra Day O'Connor retiring!
Fox News | 7/1/05 | SueRae

Posted on 07/01/2005 7:14:03 AM PDT by SueRae

Hearing on Fox News


TOPICS: Breaking News; Constitution/Conservatism
KEYWORDS: 1down6togo; filibustertime; herewego; oconnor; retirement; sandradayoconnor; scotus; supremecourt
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 521-540541-560561-580 ... 1,281-1,297 next last
To: conserv13
*Applause*

Thanks, but I was expecting *flame* ... LOL!

541 posted on 07/01/2005 8:19:34 AM PDT by SittinYonder (America is the Last Beach)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 535 | View Replies]

To: xzins; P-Marlowe; jude24

Maybe the Kelo eminent domain case will turn out to be good after all. Now the country ia awake to the mischief that a liberal court can do to private rights.


542 posted on 07/01/2005 8:19:49 AM PDT by blue-duncan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 488 | View Replies]

To: dubyaismypresident

There is a difference between social conservatives and conservatives that are both social and fiscal. Social conservatives I have met are unbending under any circumstance and if they don't get their way, they will pick up and go home and let a liberal win. I consider them the "my way" or "no way" crowd. Look at what just happened in recent months, court rulings go against what they want and they want judges impeached and an activist court.

A conservative wants a strict constructionist on the Court to rule not make up things to suit their ideology. A Conservative is the broken glass Republican who will always vote. We have to beg the social conservatives to get on board so often because some candidate is not 100% of what they want -- remember the "purist" or "true" conservative that gets tossed around -- that is from the social conservatives IMHO. That's my interpretation of the difference between a conservative and a social conservative.

BTW, if you haven't guessed, I fall the in the Conservative Republican mold that understands you don't always get everything you want but you keep on trying and never fold up your tent and go home. If I was the type to fold a tent, I would have left this site in recent months but I have chosen to stay and fight the naysayers and doom and gloomers that are now populating this site. They have risen from the ashes of 2000 to be joined by newbies or at least new screen names from 2004.


543 posted on 07/01/2005 8:20:17 AM PDT by PhiKapMom (AOII Mom -- J.C. for OK Governor in '06; Allen/Watts in 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 490 | View Replies]

To: SOSCEO
No senator in his right mind would strongly oppose a nominee who's wife was killed in 911.

Yes they would. And they would be outraged that anyone whose wife was killed on 9-11 was even considered. Outraged!

Remember who we are talking about here.

544 posted on 07/01/2005 8:20:31 AM PDT by eyespysomething ( A penny saved is a government oversight)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 453 | View Replies]

To: dubyaismypresident

Right, country club pubs can't win on their own. But neither can social conservatives.

We are wed. That is the only way we have power. So quit dissing us at the club.


545 posted on 07/01/2005 8:20:34 AM PDT by cajungirl (no)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 490 | View Replies]

To: zzen01

Wrong! We win because we carry the middleground.


546 posted on 07/01/2005 8:20:38 AM PDT by 68 grunt (3/1 India, 3rd, 68-69, 0311)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 362 | View Replies]

To: Shaq ONeal

I think I have read recently in Levin's book that it was done in the early days, maybe because a justice got put in jail or something like that.


547 posted on 07/01/2005 8:21:14 AM PDT by johnb838 (Adios, liberal mofos!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 338 | View Replies]

To: SittinYonder
That may be indigestion.

LOL, could be ... but until proven otherwise I'm going to trust this President to be a man of his word on judicial appointments.

548 posted on 07/01/2005 8:21:41 AM PDT by Oliver Optic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 521 | View Replies]

To: PhiKapMom; cajungirl

Social conservatives have a history of supporting government activism. They used to be Southern Democrats-- fully supportive of all the expansionist agenda of FDR and LBJ, but separating on civil rights issues. The notion that "the government that governs best, governs least" was foreign to them as a blanket policy covering all government action.


549 posted on 07/01/2005 8:21:44 AM PDT by GraniteStateConservative (...He had committed no crime against America so I did not bring him here...-- Worst.President.Ever.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 499 | View Replies]

To: xsmommy

"i have no idea if he will feel beholden to replace like with like. that is a horrible trap to fall into, IMO, ie; the jewish seat, the woman's seat, the black seat etc. it then becomes like an affirmative action paradigm instead of a court."

Absolutely correct, xsmommy.

Let the Dims play the race/gender/ethnicity cards. I would hope the Repubs would be above that. I'm white but would love to have 9 Clarence Thomases or Janice Rogers Browns on the court. I don't care about those types of superficial issues. I want to know if they will faithfully interpret the constitution and not legislate.

I keep seeing posts like "They wouldn't dare go after __________________", implying that somehow Dims would handle anyone other than a white male with kid gloves. We shouldn't kid ourselves. Only Repubs are that stupid (viz, Darth Vader Ginsburg).


550 posted on 07/01/2005 8:22:00 AM PDT by reelfoot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 496 | View Replies]

To: cajungirl
We are wed. That is the only way we have power. So quit dissing us at the club.

Then quit referring to us as "they" we aren't aliens.

551 posted on 07/01/2005 8:22:02 AM PDT by NeoCaveman (we should not hesitate to resolve the tension in favor of the Constitution's original meaning-Thomas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 545 | View Replies]

To: SueRae

If this is now designated "Broad Seat" then I say JANICE ROGERS-BROWN!!! I dare them to try another high-tech lynching!


552 posted on 07/01/2005 8:22:07 AM PDT by montag813
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: txrangerette

I don't remember. I know Rudman was instrumental... guaranteed GHWB that Souter was a true conservative. I remember thinking at the time "oh no he's not" but I was only basing my opinion on Souter being a New Englander.


553 posted on 07/01/2005 8:22:18 AM PDT by onyx (Pope John Paul II - May 18, 1920 - April 2, 2005 = SANTO SUBITO!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 478 | View Replies]

To: cajungirl
Social conservatives always seem to have their bags packed at the ready, threatening to split if they don't get their way.

Blackmail!

554 posted on 07/01/2005 8:22:24 AM PDT by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 235 | View Replies]

To: You Dirty Rats; XJarhead

PINNNNNNNGGGGG! The time is now--does Judge Brown have a chance?


555 posted on 07/01/2005 8:22:24 AM PDT by GoldwaterChick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 514 | View Replies]

To: 68 grunt

O buy that way I AM FROM IOWA and am a 20 year US Navy retiree and LIVE IN NEBRASKA!


556 posted on 07/01/2005 8:22:39 AM PDT by zzen01
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 524 | View Replies]

To: cajungirl
Like it or not, "social conservatives" are the backbone of the Republican Party right now. Without these social conservatives, the GOP would still be the long-term minority party it was through the 1960s and 1970s.

If you want a good indication of just how little influence these so-called "moderate Republicans" have in the GOP, just look at former New Jersey governor and EPA chief Christie Todd Whitman. Her long-awaited book -- titled something like It's My Party, Too -- was released with great fanfare in January, and then ended up on the discount rack at Barnes & Noble about 48 hours after it was released.

557 posted on 07/01/2005 8:22:53 AM PDT by Alberta's Child (I ain't got a dime, but what I got is mine. I ain't rich, but Lord I'm free.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 533 | View Replies]

To: Peach

Peach, told you so, two weeks ago.


558 posted on 07/01/2005 8:23:35 AM PDT by AliVeritas (Ignorance is a condition. Stupidity is a strategy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: cajungirl

"There is alot of room to disagree on what makes this country strong. Social conservatives don't allow much room if you ask me."

You are dead wrong!!! All conservatives win together and are united! Fiscal conservatives win when social conservatives win and vice-versa.


559 posted on 07/01/2005 8:23:38 AM PDT by Prolifeconservative (If there is another terrorist attack, the womb is a very unsafe place to hide.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 533 | View Replies]

To: PhiKapMom

I'm an across the board conservative, fiscal and social. This is the big fight. Nothing matters if our all legislation and our constitutional rights are shredded by a "moderate" Court


560 posted on 07/01/2005 8:23:42 AM PDT by NeoCaveman (we should not hesitate to resolve the tension in favor of the Constitution's original meaning-Thomas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 543 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 521-540541-560561-580 ... 1,281-1,297 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson