Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

SUPREME COURT RULING: You can arrest those using marijuana for medical purposes

Posted on 06/06/2005 7:16:18 AM PDT by Hillary's Lovely Legs

Per Fox News:

The Supreme Court has ruled Medical Marijuana as illegal.


TOPICS: Breaking News; Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: angrydopeheads; angrynannies; backtosniffingglue; bitterbitterdopers; bitterbitternannies; bitterbittersweets; bongbrigade; buzzkill; cluelesswoders; cruelty; doperhell; farout; fedophiles; hahahahahaha; illtoketothat; justsayno; keepgypsumlegal; libertarianlastdays; medicalmarijuana; mrleroyweeps; newdealotry; newdealots; nohightimes; pissedhippies; ruling; scalia; scotus; screwtheconstitution; statism; statistsrejoice; thebuzzisgone; timetosoberup; weeddude; whatstatesrights; wod; wodlist; wowman; youforgottheruling
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 701-720721-740741-760 ... 1,261-1,272 next last
To: sayitaintso

Again read the evidence: the dangers physically and mentally of pot are there in front of you but you are so obsessed with the culture of pot you cannot see it.


721 posted on 06/06/2005 6:06:49 PM PDT by eleni121 ('Thou hast conquered, O Galilean!' (Julian the Apostate))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 647 | View Replies]

To: missyme

Oh stop the hysterical exaggerration. You sound like you are coming down from a high...short term effect of use.


722 posted on 06/06/2005 6:09:13 PM PDT by eleni121 ('Thou hast conquered, O Galilean!' (Julian the Apostate))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 648 | View Replies]

To: eleni121

Really??? Since you never smoked Pot, how would you know
if someone was high on Pot? or Bananas Peels?


723 posted on 06/06/2005 6:11:59 PM PDT by missyme (Tell it like it is!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 722 | View Replies]

To: eleni121

Pot Doesn't Cause Permanent Brain Damage
Your Guide, Buddy T From Buddy T,
Your Guide to Alcoholism / Substance Abuse.

Researchers Find Minimal Long-Term Effects of Marijuana Use
An analysis of research studies with long-term, recreational users of marijuana has failed to reveal a substantial, systematic effect on the neurocognitive functioning of users. According to researchers at the University of California, San Diego (UCSD) School of Medicine, the only deleterious side effect found was a minimal malfunction in the domains of learning and forgetting.

The findings were particularly significant considering the movement by several states to make cannabis (marijuana) available as a medicinal drug, and questions regarding its potential toxicity over long-term usage.

Published in the July issue of the Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, the study involved a quantitative synthesis of 15 previously published research studies on the non-acute (residual) effects of cannabis on the neurocognitive performance of adult human subjects.

The studies included 704 long-term cannabis users and 484 non-users.
Sponsored Links

Drug Abuse TreatmentA treatment program that works! Nationally regcognized since 1947.www.mtregis.com

Drug RehabConfidential & Exclusive Treatment Center, 888-619-8500www.MalibuRecovery.com

Free Drug Rehab HelpWe will help you find solutions for your abuse situation for free.www.PacHills.com
The neurocognitive performance measurements included simple reaction time, attention, verbal/language, abstraction/executive functioning, perceptual/motor skills, motor skills, learning and forgetting.

"Surprisingly, we saw very little evidence of deleterious effects. The only exception was a very small effect in learning new information," said Igor Grant, M.D., the study's senior author, a UCSD professor of psychiatry, and director of the Center for Medicinal Cannabis Research (CMCR), a collaborative, state-supported program between UCSD and UC San Francisco, that oversees 11 studies of the safety and efficacy of medicinal cannabis to treat certain diseases.

In describing the negative effects in the study, the research team said the problems observed in learning and forgetting suggest that chronic long-term cannabis use results in selective memory defects. They added that "while the results are compatible with this conclusion, the effected size for both domains was of a very small magnitude."

Grant added that the minimal side effects seen "raised the question of practical significance. If we barely find this tiny effect in long-term heavy users of cannabis, then we are unlikely to see deleterious side effects in individuals who receive cannabis for a short time in a medical setting."

In addition, Grant said that heavy marijuana users often abuse other drugs, such as alcohol and amphetamines, which also might have long-term neurological effects. This raises the question of the extent to which the other drugs contributed to the minimal problems found in learning and forgetting in the marijuana users.

The paper's authors also noted that many of the research studies examined had significant limitations, either with small numbers of subjects or insufficient information about potential confounding factors, such as exposure to other drugs or presence of neuropsychiatric factors such as depression or personality disorders.

They noted that only studies that begin with the examination of children and young adolescents before they enter the period of risk to cannabis exposure, can sufficiently reduce the influence of these additional factors.

In addition to Grant, the paper's authors included doctoral students Raul Gonzalez, M.S., and Catherine L. Carey, M.S. and Loki Natarajan, Ph.D., UCSD HIV Neurobehavioral Research Center (HNRC) and UCSD Department of Family and Preventive Medicine, and Tanya Wolfson, M.A., UCSD HNRC.

Source: University of California - San Diego News Release.


724 posted on 06/06/2005 6:12:31 PM PDT by libertarianben (Looking for sanity and his hard to find cousin common sense)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 719 | View Replies]

To: Sandy
LOL...It will be interesting to see if this causes a split in the party. We're going to see who the true conservatives are!
...
725 posted on 06/06/2005 6:15:00 PM PDT by mugs99
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 702 | View Replies]

To: ARepublicanForAllReasons
If this decision is conservative, I guess Justice Thomas is a liberal now

Someone earlier today was asking if Thomas was a pothead. Duh. Lotta folks just can't get past the weed aspect long enough to recognize what this case is actually about.

"the federal government may now regulate quilting bees, clothes drives and potluck suppers throughout the 50 states."

Spot on.

726 posted on 06/06/2005 6:15:19 PM PDT by Sandy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 709 | View Replies]

To: Hillary's Lovely Legs

Meanwhile, Granny, of the Beverly Hillbillies, has finally found a real medicinal use for the stuff in her latest "poultice" for the family dog's leg. There are side effects, though.


727 posted on 06/06/2005 6:15:37 PM PDT by familyop ("Let us try" sounds better, don't you think? "Essayons" is so...Latin.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: libertarianben

I don't now how buddy T is or those with masters degrees pontificating on the dangers of cannabis but i do know the national institute of health and you should too.

http://www.nida.nih.gov/Infofacts/marijuana.html


728 posted on 06/06/2005 6:16:47 PM PDT by eleni121 ('Thou hast conquered, O Galilean!' (Julian the Apostate))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 724 | View Replies]

To: Sandy
Spot on.

Now that's funny. Don't care who y'are.

729 posted on 06/06/2005 6:17:43 PM PDT by derheimwill (Love is a person, not an emotion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 726 | View Replies]

To: eleni121

REally! I have had family members die horrible deaths due to Alcoholism to bad they weren't Potheads they would be alive today.....


730 posted on 06/06/2005 6:18:08 PM PDT by missyme (Tell it like it is!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 719 | View Replies]

To: Tarkin
Perhaps Scalia's opinion was written with the seat of Chief Justice in mind.
I will have to read it to validate that.
731 posted on 06/06/2005 6:18:42 PM PDT by TeleStraightShooter (When Frist exercises his belated Constitutional "Byrd option", Reid will have a "Nuclear Reaction".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 700 | View Replies]

To: pot4pain
Perhaps someone that sick should not have travelled so much.

I don't know if you know this, but people die. Sometimes of diseases. And no matter what you do, whatever magical weed you dig up, it will always happen.

Your first-day of registration and immediately you post a non-sequitur.

732 posted on 06/06/2005 6:19:00 PM PDT by AmishDude (Join the AmishDude fan club: "LOL!!!" -- MikeinIraq; "Bravo" -- EODTIM69)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 720 | View Replies]

To: pot4pain
Send photos to all the members of Congress.

The potheads secreted away in your medicinal marijuana trojan horse are anxious for your success.

A. Scalia. "Congress need not accept on faith that state law will be effective in maintaining a strict division between a lawful market for ?medical? marijuana and the more general marijuana market. See id., at 26?27, and n. 38. To impose on [Congress] the necessity of resorting to means which it cannot control, which another government may furnish or withhold, would render its course precarious, the result of its measures uncertain, and create a dependence on other governments, which might disappoint its most important designs, and is incompatible with the language of the constitution.?"

I'm very happy the potheads got stuffed today.

733 posted on 06/06/2005 6:20:15 PM PDT by JCEccles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 720 | View Replies]

To: CharlesWayneCT
"Yes, so if I grow pot in my back yard, and smoke it, I am somehow doing something related to interstate commerce."

Well, if you grew your own pot for, say, pain, you really wouldn't have a need for Advil, now would you?

That doesn't affect commerce? You and a million other dopers wouldn't have an effect on commerce?

734 posted on 06/06/2005 6:20:52 PM PDT by robertpaulsen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: missyme

Not only hysteria but increased depression and schizophrenia...symptoms I thought were associated mainly with being a Lieberal.

http://www.health.harvard.edu/fhg/updates/update0503c.shtml


735 posted on 06/06/2005 6:21:21 PM PDT by eleni121 ('Thou hast conquered, O Galilean!' (Julian the Apostate))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 723 | View Replies]

To: rockabyebaby

Yeah, really makes a bunch of sense.....they perscribe me 270 Percocets for a three months supply no sweat....

Wont let me use the weed as it will violate terms of my retirement (its illegal) and adversely effect my income.

Go figure.....


Semper Fi


736 posted on 06/06/2005 6:23:22 PM PDT by halfright (9/11 3,000 Americans MURDERED...close the borders!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: eleni121

FYI on some effects of marijuana for those of us who haven't experienced them (but have seen):

* It obviously turns people into leftist whackos who want to legalize drugs and to help their nearest national socialist lawyer party...er, liberaltarian Party, that is.

* It smells like boar pee when it's burning.

* It makes its users very paranoid.

* It inhibits logic thinking.

* It allows drunks to drink far more alcohol (remember those who smoked, drank and died).

...


737 posted on 06/06/2005 6:23:24 PM PDT by familyop ("Let us try" sounds better, don't you think? "Essayons" is so...Latin.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 722 | View Replies]

To: eleni121
The National Institute of Health? What do you think they are going to say? Pot is good put us out of business?

How do you feel about freedom? Why don't we outlaw cigarettes, hamburgers, drinking milk, sudafed, coffee, and candy? Read the papers, cigarettes are on there way to being outlawed, obesity is the new welfare queen of federal spending research and do-gooding. Coming soon, law enforcement. If you cannot determine what you put into your own body are really free? BTW, if I'm throwing up from chemotherapy, I probably don't care what the NIH propaganda says.
738 posted on 06/06/2005 6:25:36 PM PDT by jackieaxe (English speaking, tax paying, law abiding citizen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 728 | View Replies]

To: Hillary's Lovely Legs

Well, at least Clarence Thomas gets it. It's about the "CONSTITUTION". Unfortunately the majority of the "conservatives" here think it's about dope. We "CONSERVATIVES" are going to have to put our dogma aside or we're all doomed.


739 posted on 06/06/2005 6:26:52 PM PDT by Lurker 50001
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fury
Exactly.

He signed up, grew his allotted share of wheat, took the government-subsidized price (3X world market), then grew more wheat to consume at home, rather than buying it on the market.

He could have grown his allotted share, sold some to market and kept some for home use. But he got greedy.

740 posted on 06/06/2005 6:27:03 PM PDT by robertpaulsen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 701-720721-740741-760 ... 1,261-1,272 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson