He signed up, grew his allotted share of wheat, took the government-subsidized price (3X world market), then grew more wheat to consume at home, rather than buying it on the market.
He could have grown his allotted share, sold some to market and kept some for home use. But he got greedy.
Not disagreeing. Just asking for clarification.Are you opposing the claimant's decision based primarily upon his denial of cooperation with the accusor?