Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Call Lindsey Graham's Office on Judicial Filibuster
Laura Ingraham Radio Show ^ | 20 May 05

Posted on 05/20/2005 8:56:21 AM PDT by Alissa

Per Laura Ingraham, Lindsey Graham may be teetering. She recommends South Carolinians get on the phone and start telling him he needs to stick with his party.


TOPICS: Activism/Chapters; US: South Carolina
KEYWORDS: 109th; judicialfilibuster; lindseygraham
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-83 next last
To: white trash redneck

"He was on the side of the angels during the impeachment".

Actually, while Lindsay was good for the most part, he voted against one of the articles on a terrible technicality -- the one that charged Clinton with committing purjury, because the judge in the Paula Jones affair didn't step forward before the Impeachment process and acknowledge Clinton's lying, but saved that (and Paula's big judgment) for AFTER impeachment. Lindsay said "you can't conclude that Clinton committed purjury unless the judge makes that ruling." It was like Lindsay was from another planet (Clinton had obviously lied in his denials of any involvement with Monica along with all the other lies).


41 posted on 05/20/2005 1:22:47 PM PDT by ReleaseTheHounds
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Alissa
I called and asked which Pro-Life Judicial Nominees he was willing to throw down the Fire Escape??

Pray for W and Our Troops

42 posted on 05/20/2005 1:26:25 PM PDT by bray (Pray for Iraq's Freedom from Mohammad)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ReleaseTheHounds; oldglory; MinuteGal; mcmuffin; gonzo; JulieRNR21
" Actually, while Lindsay was good for the most part, he voted against one of the articles on a terrible technicality -- the one that charged Clinton with committing purjury, because the judge in the Paula Jones affair didn't step forward before the Impeachment process and acknowledge Clinton's lying, but saved that (and Paula's big judgment) for AFTER impeachment. Lindsay said "you can't conclude that Clinton committed purjury unless the judge makes that ruling." It was like Lindsay was from another planet (Clinton had obviously lied in his denials of any involvement with Monica along with all the other lies)."

I have Hannity on audiotape making that exact point during the second half hour of his radio show today. He said, "We have had our problems with Graham in the past. Graham was the one that made it possible for Clinton to dodge the most important bullet during the impeachment process." bttt

43 posted on 05/20/2005 3:45:42 PM PDT by Matchett-PI (The difference between ignorant and stupid is that stupid isn't curable.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Matchett-PI
I can't stand Lindsay. He looks like a wet caterpillar.

I wouldn't want him in my garden because I couldn't trust him not to eat all the leaves.

Leni

44 posted on 05/20/2005 4:27:17 PM PDT by MinuteGal ("The Marines keep coming. We are shooting, but the Marines won't stop !" (Fallujah Terrorists)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: MinuteGal; LadyX

Love your tagline MG. It was also probably uttered by many Japanese at Betio in the Tarawa Atoll as they mowed down wave after wave of the heroes on the coral reefs. God Bless all that have ever donned the uniform of the USMC.

I will call Mr. Graham now and ask him to please avoid betraying the confidence entrusted to him by the good people of South Carolina.


45 posted on 05/20/2005 6:17:49 PM PDT by Kudsman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Alissa

Some months ago, Lindsey Graham began giggling like a schoolboy trying to flatter his colleague, Mrs. Rodham Clinton. From that moment on, I knew that NOMINATING Lindsey in 2002 was a big mistake. I guess he can say that he is doing what Strom would have done were Strom still around. One thing that won't happen: SC voters will not nominate another Republican for that seat in 2008.


46 posted on 05/21/2005 4:48:57 AM PDT by Theodore R. (Cowardice is forever!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: areafiftyone

Juat as long as it is her boot it maybe is fine.


47 posted on 05/21/2005 7:42:15 AM PDT by Piquaboy (22 year veteran of the Army, Air Force and Navy, Pray for all our military .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: conservativecorner

I called his Columbia, SC office yesterday. The snappish young man who answered interrupted my protest against Sen. Graham's dealmaking with a loud "The Senator supports the constitutional option!!" Then he demanded my name and address; this was clearly intended to intimidate, but I gave it anyway. Gave it again when I emailed his website that afternoon. So what?

He and his staff must have been pretty fed up with Rush and Hannity siccing their listeners (inc. me) on them. A while back Hannity succeeded in provoking the senator to call his show. Graham was finger-waving angry as he harrumph-harrumphed at the conservative gadfly.

But any, I mean any, Republican with no more than breath and a heartbeat going for him/her is better than decades of the gawdawful Fritz Hollings.


48 posted on 05/21/2005 9:15:42 AM PDT by elcid1970
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: MinuteGal
I can't stand Lindsay. He looks like a wet caterpillar. I wouldn't want him in my garden because I couldn't trust him not to eat all the leaves

He's a slip-n-fall lawyer!

49 posted on 05/21/2005 11:04:04 AM PDT by Fudd Fan (red, red voter in a blue, blue state)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: linn37

Nobody is questioning Chafee's sexuality: Graham's is always in question. I believe SC conservatives are going to get an umpleasant surprise some day...


50 posted on 05/21/2005 7:52:03 PM PDT by Meldrim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: elcid1970
He and his staff must have been pretty fed up with Rush and Hannity siccing their listeners (inc. me) on them.

Then Graham should not meet with the Gang of Eleven.

51 posted on 05/21/2005 7:53:43 PM PDT by af_vet_1981
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: Alissa
SC resident here.

I've called his offices several times and have e-mailed him a few times over the past few days.

Lindsey is a big disappointment.

52 posted on 05/21/2005 8:02:37 PM PDT by RightWinger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: areafiftyone

I will give Graham this one last chance.

If he votes with the Demodogs, or makes a deal with them, on President Bush's judicial nominees, I will be contributing to a primary opponent.

This is it - and I hope everyone of this mind (and anyone who is similarly fed up with him and have already had enough) phone his offices TODAY AND TOMORROW.


53 posted on 05/22/2005 11:23:31 AM PDT by AFPhys ((.Praying for President Bush, our troops, their families, and all my American neighbors..))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: RightWinger

Any response?


54 posted on 05/22/2005 4:41:17 PM PDT by elcid1970
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: Alissa

Sent mine in from CT. Asked him to keep in mind how he got into the senate in the first place..The Republican Party. I also pointed out his assured defeat and short career should he break ranks. We'll see how stupid he is....


55 posted on 05/22/2005 5:10:39 PM PDT by FROGTOWN CONSERVATIVE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: over3Owithabrain
Your radar has homed onto just what I have been thinking. The DemonRats may have some very compromising information on Lindsey Graham's very hidden personal life. I remember during the Clinton years the FBI Filegate. I wonder is Graham has a file on him that the DemonRats are using as blackmail against him. Something like being a closet homosexual would do it for Lindsey Graham.
56 posted on 05/22/2005 5:43:28 PM PDT by jonrick46
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Alissa
"My personal opinion is FBI files."

Mr. Graham,

If you have private issues that preclude you from freely performing on your political obligations (i.e. personal baggage being used by political opponents to force your cooperation), then you need to resign. Or is the power so alluring that you cannot bear to separate yourself from it?
57 posted on 05/22/2005 6:22:36 PM PDT by Gum Shoe (I'm not a professional military officer, I just play one on TV.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Soul Seeker

We (libs and conservatives alike) are all so concerned about how appellate and Supreme Ct. justices will rule concerning legislation--legislation passed by freely elected US and state legislators. Yet, there is NOTHING, I repeat NOTHING in the US constitution giving federal judges the authority to overturn legislation passed by such legislators. The judiciary (under Chief Justice Marshall) essentially seized this power in a constitutional coup in the seminal case Marbury vs. Madison. What we conservatives should be debating is whether the institution of judicial review should even exist in this day and age. Most representative republics don't have it. A law passed by a freely elected parliament is assumed to be constitutional. That is how it is in Britain and most of Europe. American legislators and executives swear an oath to uphold and defend the US constitution. It is thus unthinkable that they would introuduce, let alone pass legislation violating our Constitution. I know this seems quixotic, but if we press our allies in the Federalist society and in Congress, we may, someday, be able to push through a constituional amendment eliminating the odious doctrine of judicial review.


58 posted on 05/23/2005 6:48:08 AM PDT by sawdust ("Justice Marshall has made his decision, now let him enforce it"--Pres. Andrew Jackson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Alissa; All

My sources tell me the biggest obstacle on the nuke option is NOT Graham, but that good ol boy John Warner from Virginia. It seems Warner is back from the dead to bite conservatives in the butt again. I like Laura Ingram, but my source is a U.S. Senator.

If you want to get Warner on board -- I would contact Virginia friends and have them get word to his office immediately.


59 posted on 05/23/2005 6:55:39 AM PDT by Iron Eagle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: conservativecorner

ALL OF NEED TO WRITE TO ALL OF THEM AND TELL THEM JUST BECAUSE WE CAN'T VOTE FOR THEM DOES NOT MEAN CAN'T BEAT THEM, WE CAN SEND MONEY TO ANYONE WHO RUNS AGAINST THEM. AND WE HAVE THE INTERNET TO INFORM THOSE IN HIS STATE. THEN TELL THEM WE WILL DO TO HIM (THEM) WHAT WE DID TO TOM DASCHLE AND TOM FOLEY AND ETC. SO WE CAN HELP THEM WITH ONE WAY TICKET HOME. I HAVE DONE THIS TO LOTS IN CONGRESS. AND THEY KNOW OUR MONEY HELP GET THE TOM'S OUT. SO WE DO HAVE THE POWER TO DO IT. I TOLD THEM IT MAY TAKE AWHILE BUT WE WILL GET THE JOB DONE. I TOLD THEM TO CALL TOM DASCHLE AND ASK HIM, HE KNOWS VERY WELL IT WAS OUR MONEY ALONG WITH VOTERS. SO WRITE AND CALL THEM ALL.


60 posted on 05/23/2005 7:46:01 AM PDT by ducks1944 (GOD BLESS THE USA ! !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-83 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson