Posted on 04/23/2005 8:52:02 PM PDT by CHARLITE
Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton yesterday stood behind her indicted former fund-raiser after prosecutors said Ted Kennedy's brother-in-law taped him making "incriminating" statements about her Senate campaign's Hollywood gala.
"The Senate campaign committee fully cooperated with the investigation. [David] Rosen worked hard for the campaign and we trust that when all the facts are in, he will be cleared," Clinton lawyer David Kendall said in an e-mail to The Post.
Rosen goes to trial May 3 on charges of falsely underreporting the costs of the August 2000 gala — thus inflating the amount of campaign cash ostensibly raised for Clinton at the event.
(Excerpt) Read more at nypost.com ...
Almost makes a person sorry for her... almost. ;-)
It could be whether he will get his heart medicine when he needs it . . .
.......Or if he survives solitary confinement after failing to give a urine specimen
I said "women". And what you posted clearly does not fall into that category. ;-)
The plot thickens... It will be interesting to see how this plays out. (not holding breath)
Phew! Now I'm relieved. You're a normal man!
BTW......try to imagine Killery attempting a "fashion statement" like elegant Condi made with those stilletto heeled black boots and the terrific long black coat, when she was touring the European capitals! Hilldabeastie could NEVER pull off a fashion show of that impact and magnitude.
Among other intolerable items, how could we bear seeing every imaginable shade of the same pant suit design for 4 years, let alone 8 years?
Me thinks the FBI and Secret Service don't play well together. The FBI would not want to risk the wire being detected by a technical sweep of anyone one getting close to a principle being protected by the Secret Service.
I can't even imagine the hate Hillary has for Monica. It changed everything.
No she did not!!
Her shyster lawyer David Kendall did. The Hildabeaste, as usual, is far, far above sending a message to us little folks.
This is so typical. If she runs for pres in 2008, IMHO, we'll hear next to nothing directly from her. Maybe during the debates. But there will be NO no-holds-barred Q&A sessions.
...and that is the main feature about her which is so frustrating. She's great at avoiding having to answer any real questions. However, that's one reason for which I personally am hoping that Newt Gingrich might be our Republican nominee. He is SO erudite, such a distinguished scholar, academician and historian that she really wouldn't be able to survive 3 debates with Newt.
Yep
Good catch
The Clinton's did this same thing back when they were Co-Presidents
Mr. President get away from these Clinton's before they bring you down with them!
Another poorly written article by the Post's hapless "Washington insider." Will someone please tell me here, what is the crime? By deflating expenses to show bigger "profits" shall we say, you've only made an idiot out of yourself for being exposed. I don't get the crime: false reporting to inflate your ego? If this were a taxable institution you'd only have increased your tax liability (a good thing from the government's perspective.) He's obviously an idiot, everyone who works for the Clinton's is morally bankrupt and mindlessly dumb, however I dont get what the crime is here. Could Orin have bothered to cite the statute or law that he broke or the point of this trial?
I agree. It's not as if he's going to get Hillary's "womyn" vote (if you can call them that. You know, the Jane Fonda, post menopausal, "I am womyn here me roar" crowd) so, no loss there. His grasp of history and clarity on the issues is astounding, his ability to lead and rally the troops is second to none. I dont think his controversial past (e.g. dumping his wife during her cancer treatment. Let's face facts, that's his real baggage) is going to lose us any votes we haven't already lost.
Hillary Campaign Finance Director Indicted (1-7-05; the 10-page indictment) smoking gun ^ | 1-2005 | website Posted on 04/21/2005 4:19:42 PM PDT by doug from upland LINK TO VIEW THE INDICTMENT Hillary Campaign Finance Director Indicted Rosen charged with fudging numbers for 2000 Hollywood fundraiser JANUARY 7--The finance director for Hillary Clinton's 2000 U.S. Senate campaign was indicted today on federal charges of filing bogus financial reports with the Federal Election Commission. According to the below indictment, David Rosen reported the false numbers in connection with a "Hollywood tribute" honoring Clinton. Investigators allege that a "wealthy individual" paid more than $1.1 million to underwrite the Clinton gala and that those payments were delivered through "several corporate entities controlled by him." While that whopping sum should have been reported to the FEC as an "in-kind contribution," prosecutors charge that Rosen covered up the real source of the money, and even caused the creation of a fictitious $200,000 invoice to aid his scheme. The August 2000 fundraiser was billed as a "Hollywood Tribute to William Jefferson Clinton," though the funds raised went to his wife's campaign kitty.
That is an article worth posting. (Sorry, I don't understand why Deborah Orin has a job,)
Hillary....You're smelling more like three week old dead fish everyday....keep it up!...
"We have shredded everything we can find to shred. We just have to get our hands on Rosen and borrow one of Saddam's shredders." Hitlery
She will use the Clinton method deny, deny, deny. And of course Rosen will get off.Hasn't all the Clinton crooks?
Many said he should be P after slick because things would be such a mess. But there was great fear thta he would then appoint 2, maybe 3 supreme court justices. It looks like three or 4 are waiting for a dem P in order to retire. Now that would be ironic if al wins and gets to appoint them after all. The reps will not fight them and America will be destroyed.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.