Posted on 04/21/2005 11:14:33 AM PDT by Republican Red
WASHINGTON - Senate Democrats are quietly trying to kill a 10-year legal probe that implicates several senior Clinton administration appointees for obstruction of justice, the Daily News has learned.
The Democrats, saying that the $21 million investigation by Independent Counsel David Barrett should have ended long ago, succeeded in attaching an amendment to a spending bill Tuesday to cut off his funding by June 1.
But two sources close to the investigation said that if the legislation becomes law, it will thwart Barrett from making public a final report that names senior officials in the Clinton Justice Department and Internal Revenue Service who allegedly buried a tax fraud case involving former cabinet member Henry Cisneros.
"It's about obstruction of justice," said one of the sources. "People are willing to take drastic actions to kill this report."
Sen. Byron Dorgan (D-N.D.), who introduced the amendment with Sen. John Kerry (D-Mass.), said last week that the disgraced HUD secretary paid a $10,000 fine in 1999 for lying to the FBI and that then-President Bill Clinton pardoned Cisneros, so the probe "should have ended years ago."
Barrett's probe began in 1995 by looking into allegations that Cisneros, who was Clinton's secretary of Housing and Urban Development, lied to the FBI about payments to his mistress. It expanded years ago into a broader obstruction case involving alleged tax fraud, according to the sources.
The report will allege that Justice Department officials snuffed out a tax case against Cisneros and that the IRS sometimes audited Clinton critics without good cause.
Barrett's investigation was wrapped up two years ago, and his 400-page final report was submitted to a three-judge panel last August, said two sources.
Because those named in the report have until the end of June to refute Barrett's findings, Kerry and Dorgan's amendment would prevent its release.
I sent it to Power Line - they are pretty good about letting you know what, when and if they are interested.
Thanks
Well .. thank you!! Hopefully they will be able to look into this for us.
I get a sick picture in my head when I hear the words "probe" and "Clinton" in the same sentence.....ICK!!!
The dems had to have a bill they were positive Bush would not veto.
Can he use a line item veto?
No! But .. since there is both a senate and a House version - it will go to a committee where they will try to put one bill together from both of them.
At that time - the House can say - NO TO THE AMENDMENT. Since DeLay is in charge there - I'd say the chances might be pretty good to get rid of the amendment.
If we all make enough stink - maybe we can get that dang amendment off the bill.
We're waiting to hear from PowerLine about if this is where the amendment is and what's happening with it.
This is Clinton's 'Third Legacy'.
:^)
There used to be a bar in LA named "Probe". It was a gay bar. Excuse me if I didn't want to go there.
All I could think of was my prostrate exam at my urologist and I never found that quite thrilling if not the exact opposite.
I thought with the Clin toons, it is or was, what is "is" is or was or is, not waht.
> Can you please outline and cite examples for your claim that Bill Clinton and his administration were "...the most corrupt administration in history." I'm just curious. I'm new around here.
Just about to graduate from 6th grade, eh? Go to the library and read, kid.
> I read both sides. They think Clinton is a god. Y'all think he is the worst person on the face of the earth, or at least in American history. So, how come?
Remember what happened in Canada just a few weeks back.
ABSOFRICKINTUTLY
> How about Ol'-I-Should-have-gotten-five-years-for-STEALING-classified-Clinton-era-documents-for $1000, please, Alex.
If you mean Pantload Berger, he hasn't been sentenced yet only a plea bargain, and supposedly the investigation into who at the archives called whom when he stole 'em is still ongoing. At least I sure hope so.
I just know Judy Woodward of CNN will be discussing this.
You mean....the Clinton's might have facilitated 9/11??? I'm shocked!!!
Can you please outline and cite examples...Translation: I am too lazy to do my own research.
for your claim...Translation: for your incorrect belief
that Bill Clinton and his administration were...Translation: I sure do miss him
"...the most corrupt administration in history." ...Translation: I can't believe you F'n Freeper's are ignoring Tricky Dick!!!
I'm just curious. ...Translation: I am just trying to see who falls for this trolling stunt
I'm new around here....Translation: I am a Troll
I read both sides....Translation: And believe one, laugh at the other.
They think Clinton is a god. ...Translation: As do I.
Y'all think he is the worst person on the face of the earth,...Translation: I can try and talk redneck to be like the rest of Y'all
or at least in American history. So, how come?...Translation: I don't know WTFIATA.
So try this as a partial answer:
CLINTON ADMINISTRATION CRIME STATS
- Number of individuals and businesses associated with the Clinton machine who have been convicted of or pleaded guilty to crimes: 47
- Number of these convictions during Clinton's presidency: 33
- Number of indictments/misdemeanor charges: 61
- Number of congressional witnesses who have pleaded the Fifth Amendment, fled the country to avoid testifying, or (in the case of foreign witnesses) refused to be interviewed: 122
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.