Posted on 04/21/2005 3:38:01 AM PDT by The Raven
A Democratic fund-raiser involved in Senator Clinton's 2000 campaign has offered a guilty plea to bank fraud charges and is likely to become a government witness at the upcoming federal trial of a top finance aide to Mrs. Clinton, David Rosen, court records obtained by The New York Sun show.
As part of an FBI investigation into alleged campaign finance reporting violations by Mrs. Clinton's campaign, the mystery witness secretly taped a conversation with Mr. Rosen in September 2002 and apparently tried to elicit statements from the former Clinton staffer about financial irregularities involving an August 2000 Hollywood fund-raising event.
Allegedly inaccurate reports about that event filed with the Federal Election Commission led to Mr. Rosen's indictment on four counts of causing false statements to be made to federal authorities. One count was dropped by a judge last month, but Mr. Rosen is scheduled to go to trial on the remaining charges at Los Angeles on May 3.
-snip-
(Excerpt) Read more at nysun.com ...
HILL=O=REE could rub 'stuff' all over herself and she would think she would not stink.
This guy is a dead man walking. Hitlery has already put out a "contract".
You can say that again. I'm sick of the double standard. I want congressional Republicans to go on offense.
Oh-oh. The bodies are going to start piling up in New York now...
ping
Agreed.
The Dems wont allow Tom Delay his trial because they would then have to stop the inuendo campaign. Dont look for Hillary to ever face anything like delay is getting now, The Pubbies havent got the balls for it.
The real mystery is if anyone can find a single instance where the Klinton's did not lie, steal, or cheat.
Beginning w/their "I Do" promise to be faithful "until death do us part".
That's why the "Pubbies" are in the majority and you're not!
I'm sick of this line that repubs don't have the Fortitude and somehow those that suggest they ought to go firebomb everyone and everything really have no clue!
....The Pubbies havent got the balls for it.....
More accurately, they don't have the mad dogs of the MSM who do the actual water carrying
Yes but then, when you consider that the Democratic Party is just an adjunct of the MSM, there cannot be symmetry in the coverage of the two parties.Even if the MSM wanted to distance itself from the Democratic Party - and it certainly does not - it wouln't really be possible because the Democratic Party would just continue to echo the perspective of journalism. The same superficiality and the same arroganc,e and the same second-guessing of the people who actually make decisions and live with the consequences of them.
Why Broadcast Journalism is
Unnecessary and Illegitimate
The Clintulas are a team. The fact she never got her marriage annulled means she is married to Chinagate, the Ron Brown Coverup, the Vince Foster coverup, the Jerry Parks mystery, Pardoning a crack dealer for cash to her brother, pardoning FALN terrorists for votes, etc.
Media bias bump.
It's the weenies who backstab great reporters like Chris Ruddy that keep the rats on their feet. Maybe there was a time to run from the truth, back when the old media was dominant. But why now?
She needs to rub stuff on her to stink? I thought that rot was her natural musk.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.