Posted on 04/02/2005 8:00:41 AM PST by MaximusRules
The deal's terms make clear that Berger spoke falsely last summer in public claims that in 2003 he twice inadvertently walked off with copies of a classified document during visits to the National Archives, then later lost them.
He described the episode last summer as "an honest mistake...."
The terms of Berger's agreement required him to acknowledge to the Justice Department the circumstances of the episode. Rather than misplacing or unintentionally throwing away three of the five copies he took from the archives, as the former national security adviser earlier maintained, he shredded them with a pair of scissors late one evening at the downtown offices of his international consulting business.
The document, written by former National Security Council terrorism expert Richard A. Clarke, was an "after-action review" prepared in early 2000 detailing the administration's actions to thwart terrorist attacks during the millennium celebration. It contained considerable discussion about the administration's awareness of the rising threat of attacks on U.S. soil.
(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonpost.com ...
NO............that's where WE come in.
From the first day on, the Clintonistas settled in in typical MAFIOSO fashion. ROTTEN, EVIL SOB's.
That's why I sent the link in post #59 to my email list and the media. We need to write letters to editors as well.
We must not let Sandy Burglary & the Clinton machine get away with yet another cover-up.
Because there were some facts out there that were so damning, Sandy Berger was willing to break the law to make sure the public never saw them.
They must indeed have been "damning".
"he isnt getting his security clearance back after this....just to correct you.... "
Sorry to disagree with you but Sandy Berger is part of the ruling class and will probably be a trusted member of the next Democrat administration. Whoever that may be
Rush said yesterday that the missing docs had hand written margin notes from the staffers & other officials who had read them. So that input is now lost.
That Berger would risk getting caught for this crime indicates the seriousness of what they contained!
I am outraged that he only got a 'slap on the wrist'.
I just hope whatever 'deal' was cut garnered enough evidence to be useful in 2008 should another Clinton seek to be POTUS!
Come on now folks!
Just because he stuffed classified documents from the U.S. National Archives down his pants, shredded them, and then lied about it, doesn't mean we should treat the guy like some kinf of CRIMIN.... oh..right..
... um, nevermind.
Heyo
that is the initial penalty.
But he won't get through another investigation without this being pardoned on his record. It won't come from W I am almost certain.
DSS will choke on it when the next renewal investigation comes up.
He will need to be in a position that requires the clearance anyway to get one.
There are many many things that need to be changed for him.
NSA's or anything else for that matter need to be approved, and that wont happen with a GOP controlled Senate, which it will be.
It wont happen. I keep telling you guys this, but none of you have security clearances in the first place. There is a process that needs to occur before he can get another one.
The dirty scum bag did what would have been 20 to 50 years for a military person. There are people in jail for just leaving the documents out of the safe. I just do not understand how we are held to the law when these Washington scum bags get away with murder.
I really liked the part where ole Sandy takes the scissors and cuts up two of the documents as an "honest mistake."
Good link, I had read it earlier today.
Another job for FR and the blogosphere..........
Depending upon how his phone pic emails were routed over the web, some public or private server out "there" somewhere could easily have copies...needing only Berger's cell phone number to narrow down a quick search of a hard drive to find...a FReeper research project if ever there was one.
Hmm, that didn't stop them from putting Attorney General John Mitchell in prison, and I'd suspect that he knew some interesting things, too. Who said they'd have to put SanBurgler in a regular prison cell? They could stuff him in the same place where they have Pollard and Ames.
I do see one possible upside to this plea deal, he's supposed to "cooperate" with the Feds to keep the deal, and even if you're right about them not putting him in prison, they can still tweak with his fine. I suspect that he's going to give some information that could be used if Hillary ever does decide to make a serious run at the Presidency. SanBurgler is no longer a threat to this nation, but she is, and like a low level drug bust, its better to get info on the higher-ups.
WARNING. Reading the following comment may cause spewing of liquids on to keyboard and monitor. Please swallow before continuing. No animals were injured in the making of this post. Any similarity to reality is purely coincidental. Any factual statement is not the intent of the poster. Views expressed by the poster are not necessarily shared by the poster. Price is for 24 month lease with $2500 down. Your mileage may vary. Objects are closer than they appear. No shirt, no shoes, no service. You must be at least this tall to ride. Do not remove under penalty of law. Remain seated until the ride comes to a full and complete stop. Reading this post may cause low birth weight. Not recommended for viewers with heart conditions, back or neck injuries, breathing difficulties, recent surgery or illness, high blood pressure and carpal tunnel syndrome.
[Disclaimer courtesy of Conspiracy Guy]
It appears from what has been made public, that there is an ongoing and very serious Berglergate investigation. Why else would the feds give him a lightened sentence for "cooperating" ...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.