| This thread has been locked, it will not receive new replies. |
| Locked on 03/23/2005 8:35:06 PM PST by Admin Moderator, reason: |
Posted on 03/22/2005 6:31:40 PM PST by STARWISE
Edited on 03/22/2005 9:46:25 PM PST by Admin Moderator. [history]
Tonight it is, March 22, 2005, over five days since Theresa Marie Schiavo commenced her ordeal of purposeful and legally sanctioned dehydration and starvation. We await a decision from the three judge panel from Eleventh Judicial Circuit as to her fate, as her family struggles with seeing Terri's physical health deteriorate.
Who is Moody????????
Well, at least that one more conservative than we've had so far.
That's what I heard.....
So i am right?
I'm so sorry to hear about your grandmother. I have sent prayers for her strength and your comfort.
What photos Lady Pilgrim?
Clinton was inaugurated in 1993.
Another reason why MS wants his wife dead.
He doesn't want a divorce and property settlement.
He does not want a living breathing monument to remind him daily of his wrongs, his hate, his guilt. Terri has to be gone so he can, well, you know, "move along".
I don't think he is afraid of her. He may not want her parents to be guardians and have access to medical and financial records. No telling what is in there. Remember the xrays that were hidden from them,the ones with the proof of spousal abuse.
The devil is with Terri Schiavo to see that she does not get a drink to quinch her thirst, did you not figure this out?
Yep, he hasn't been with her any other time...when they took the tube out he sent a representative...now he is making sure that she dies...however, we have Jesus and He will keep her strong...believe!
We'll get him.
This is so obvious to any decent person with common sense (I know that there are not a lot of them around anymore) that it is astonishing that all the king's judges and all the king's men cannot make sense of this mess. Newt Gingrich is right. The lawyerly class - his words - need to have their wings clipped.
Than I am right, the Judge who seated in the court in 1992 was nominated to the bench by Bush Sr. Well, that is good, we have a mix, but still to liberals opinion can trump one conservatives!
I don't see where to find those docs -- can you give me a hint? It's not in Opinions today -- thanks.
Instead, Michael moved in with another woman (who helped put him in touch with men who would order her killing) and fathered her two children, all the while pushing for her murder. In the process, he's put us all through HELL.
David Boise argued the case FOR algore against Ted Olsen/Bush in 2000 at the Supreme Court!
If I remember correctly. ;-)
Do you think that Wittmore treated the case as a de novo complaint?
Right, Bush senior (may not be better). But 2 out of 3 isn't good at all.
I don't think he is afraid of her. He may not want her parents to be guardians and have access to medical and financial records. No telling what is in there. Remember the xrays that were hidden from them,the ones with the proof of spousal abuse.
Which is why he wants her body creamated as well, also against her religion.
You're right. I meant through the court by removing the tube but didn't say that, did I. It was clear as mud. My posts haven't been on target lately. Sorry.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.