Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Torie

Do you think that Wittmore treated the case as a de novo complaint?


277 posted on 03/22/2005 7:41:11 PM PST by ruoflaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 234 | View Replies ]


To: ruoflaw

Do you think that Wittmore treated the case as a de novo complaint?



Nope. If he had, the Schindler's would have been able to enter new evidence...all he did was look at what Greer already did...de novo means "to toss out the old and start anew" this wasn't done


292 posted on 03/22/2005 7:42:49 PM PST by LegalEagle61
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 277 | View Replies ]

To: ruoflaw
It doesn't look that way.

I'm wondering if the 11th circuit treated it like a DE NOVO complaint.

306 posted on 03/22/2005 7:44:28 PM PST by TAdams8591 (The call you make may be the one that saves Terri's life!!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 277 | View Replies ]

To: ruoflaw

He treated it as a de novo proceeding, but was trapped by the complaint in deciding the liklihood of success on what was plead, which is an essential element when granting a preliminary injunction.


310 posted on 03/22/2005 7:45:27 PM PST by Torie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 277 | View Replies ]

To: ruoflaw

The way that the "de novo" thingy was explained on TV the other night led me to believe that the case was to start from SCRATCH---new testimony, new evidence, new everything, which would take a long time, not just 14-15 hours or so....

Right?


342 posted on 03/22/2005 7:49:54 PM PST by Txsleuth (Mark Levin for Supreme Court Chief Justice!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 277 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson