Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

HP: We have the next transistor
CNN:Money ^ | February 1, 2005

Posted on 02/01/2005 8:12:32 AM PST by Paradox

NEW YORK (Reuters) - Hewlett-Packard Co. said Tuesday that its researchers have proven that a technology they invented could eventually replace the transistor, a fundamental building block of computers.

In a paper published in Tuesday's Journal of Applied Physics, HP said three members of its Quantum Science Research group propose and demonstrate a "crossbar latch," which provides the signal restoration and inversion required for general computing without the need for transistors.

HP (up $0.25 to $19.59, Research) said in a statement that the technology could result in computers that are thousands of times more powerful than those that exist today.

(Excerpt) Read more at money.cnn.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: computers; electronics; transistor
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-32 next last

1 posted on 02/01/2005 8:12:32 AM PST by Paradox
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Paradox

So I wonder when Jane will make her appearance.


2 posted on 02/01/2005 8:14:35 AM PST by aruanan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: aruanan

i robot here we come.


3 posted on 02/01/2005 8:15:54 AM PST by Bikers4Bush (Flood waters rising, heading for more conservative ground. Vote for true conservatives!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Paradox

How is this any different from the quantum computing R&D that IBM has been working on for years?


4 posted on 02/01/2005 8:16:11 AM PST by Future Snake Eater ("Stupid grandma leaver-outers!"--Tom Servo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paradox
Is this the technical development that will finally give me my jet pack?

5 posted on 02/01/2005 8:16:47 AM PST by atomicpossum (I am the Cat that walks by himself, and all places are alike to me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Future Snake Eater

I am guessing practicality and the ability to produce and get it to the consumer market within a reasonable cost. I am sure there are other things such as the fact that quantum computing isnt quite viable yet.


6 posted on 02/01/2005 8:22:20 AM PST by aft_lizard (This space waiting for a post election epiphany)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Paradox
A key patent behind this:

6,586,965 - Molecular crossbar latch
Inventor(s) Kuekes; Phillip J. (Menlo Park, CA)
Assignee(s) and Licensee(s) Hewlett Packard Company
USPTO Info at USPTO
Date Granted 2003-07-01
Country USA
Description A molecular crossbar latch is provided, comprising two control wires and a signal wire that crosses the two control wires at a non-zero angle to thereby form a junction with each control wire. Each junction forms a switch and the junction has a functional dimension in nanometers. The signal wire selectively has at least two different voltage states, ranging from a 0 state to a 1 state, wherein there is an asymmetry with respect to the direction of current flow from the signal wire through one junction compared to another junction such that current flowing through one junction into (out of) the signal wire can open (close) while current flowing through the other junction out of (into) the signal wire can close (open) the switch, and wherein there is a voltage threshold for switching between an open switch and a closed switch. Further, methods are provided for latching logic values onto nanowires in a logic array, for inverting a logic value, and for restoring a voltage value of a signal in a nano-scale wire.

7 posted on 02/01/2005 8:22:40 AM PST by ThePythonicCow (Welcome home, Vietnam Vets.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: atomicpossum

Ever since I saw video of one of those in action I've wanted one. The airport I fly from is on an island that is separated from the city's downtown by a gap of ~150 yards (it's in Guinnes as the world's shortest ferry crossing) and I'd love to just hop over instead of waiting for the boat.


8 posted on 02/01/2005 8:23:06 AM PST by Squawk 8888 (End dependence on foreign oil- put a Slowpoke in your basement)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Paradox

This could be the next "bubble memory"!


9 posted on 02/01/2005 8:24:04 AM PST by AppyPappy (If You're Not A Part Of The Solution, There's Good Money To Be Made In Prolonging The Problem.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paradox

Does this mean that I have to throw out my 8-track now?


10 posted on 02/01/2005 8:24:57 AM PST by reagan_fanatic (Rap - the other Disco)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paradox
Reverse engineered from Roswell

11 posted on 02/01/2005 8:25:32 AM PST by evets (God bless president George W. Bush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ThePythonicCow
Powder..Patch..Ball FIRE!
Dr. Kuekes has been a busy boy!

http://www.google.com/search?q=Kuekes%3B+Phillip+J.&sourceid=mozilla-search&start=0&start=0&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&client=firefox-a&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official

12 posted on 02/01/2005 8:29:05 AM PST by BallandPowder
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Paradox

When I went to school the hot topic was submicron gate lengths.


13 posted on 02/01/2005 8:29:23 AM PST by Jack of all Trades
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AppyPappy
This could be the next "bubble memory"!

LOL!

Bubble Memory

14 posted on 02/01/2005 8:33:39 AM PST by facedown (Armed in the Heartland)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Paradox
the technology could result in computers that are thousands of times more powerful than those that exist today.

Useless, as long as we have to continue using Microcrap operating systems.

15 posted on 02/01/2005 8:36:54 AM PST by clee1 (Islam is a deadly plague; liberalism is the AIDS virus that prevents us from defending ourselves.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reagan_fanatic

LOL!


16 posted on 02/01/2005 8:39:10 AM PST by Rutles4Ever (This is my tagline.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Paradox

how long before they start making biological ones?


17 posted on 02/01/2005 8:41:51 AM PST by the invisib1e hand ("What are you gonna believe, the media, or your own eyes?" -- Marx .............(Groucho))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: the invisib1e hand
There's a guy named Christopher Mitchell at Maas Biolabs who's close to a breakthrough on the biochip.

That's an obscure joke

18 posted on 02/01/2005 9:06:40 AM PST by ClearCase_guy (The fourth estate is a fifth column.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy

No Maas, No Maas. -- Roberto Duran


19 posted on 02/01/2005 9:13:45 AM PST by SAJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Paradox

"said in a statement that the technology could result in computers that are thousands of times more powerful than those that exist today."


No doubt, running on Windoze.


/sarcasm off.


20 posted on 02/01/2005 9:13:55 AM PST by taxed2death (A few billion here, a few trillion there...we're all friends right?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-32 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson