1 posted on
02/01/2005 8:12:32 AM PST by
Paradox
To: Paradox
So I wonder when Jane will make her appearance.
2 posted on
02/01/2005 8:14:35 AM PST by
aruanan
To: Paradox
How is this any different from the quantum computing R&D that IBM has been working on for years?
4 posted on
02/01/2005 8:16:11 AM PST by
Future Snake Eater
("Stupid grandma leaver-outers!"--Tom Servo)
To: Paradox
![](http://pages.sbcglobal.net/atomicpossum/segami/apossum2.gif)
Is this the technical development that will finally give me my
jet pack?
![](http://completewasteoftime.blogs.com/weblog/images/rocketman-thumb.jpg)
5 posted on
02/01/2005 8:16:47 AM PST by
atomicpossum
(I am the Cat that walks by himself, and all places are alike to me.)
To: Paradox
A key patent behind this:
6,586,965 - Molecular crossbar latch |
Inventor(s) |
Kuekes; Phillip J. (Menlo Park, CA) |
Assignee(s) and Licensee(s) |
Hewlett Packard Company
|
USPTO |
Info at USPTO |
Date Granted |
2003-07-01 |
Country |
USA |
Description |
A molecular crossbar latch is provided, comprising two control wires and a signal wire that crosses the two control wires at a non-zero angle to thereby form a junction with each control wire. Each junction forms a switch and the junction has a functional dimension in nanometers. The signal wire selectively has at least two different voltage states, ranging from a 0 state to a 1 state, wherein there is an asymmetry with respect to the direction of current flow from the signal wire through one junction compared to another junction such that current flowing through one junction into (out of) the signal wire can open (close) while current flowing through the other junction out of (into) the signal wire can close (open) the switch, and wherein there is a voltage threshold for switching between an open switch and a closed switch. Further, methods are provided for latching logic values onto nanowires in a logic array, for inverting a logic value, and for restoring a voltage value of a signal in a nano-scale wire. |
7 posted on
02/01/2005 8:22:40 AM PST by
ThePythonicCow
(Welcome home, Vietnam Vets.)
To: Paradox
This could be the next "bubble memory"!
9 posted on
02/01/2005 8:24:04 AM PST by
AppyPappy
(If You're Not A Part Of The Solution, There's Good Money To Be Made In Prolonging The Problem.)
To: Paradox
Does this mean that I have to throw out my 8-track now?
10 posted on
02/01/2005 8:24:57 AM PST by
reagan_fanatic
(Rap - the other Disco)
To: Paradox
Reverse engineered from Roswell
![](http://images.google.com/images?q=tbn:fquMwNCvY0YJ:www.dolomite.ndirect.co.uk/weirdwilts/roswell/Roswell.jpg)
11 posted on
02/01/2005 8:25:32 AM PST by
evets
(God bless president George W. Bush)
To: Paradox
When I went to school the hot topic was submicron gate lengths.
To: Paradox
the technology could result in computers that are thousands of times more powerful than those that exist today. Useless, as long as we have to continue using Microcrap operating systems.
15 posted on
02/01/2005 8:36:54 AM PST by
clee1
(Islam is a deadly plague; liberalism is the AIDS virus that prevents us from defending ourselves.)
To: Paradox
how long before they start making biological ones?
17 posted on
02/01/2005 8:41:51 AM PST by
the invisib1e hand
("What are you gonna believe, the media, or your own eyes?" -- Marx .............(Groucho))
To: Paradox
"said in a statement that the technology could result in computers that are thousands of times more powerful than those that exist today."
No doubt, running on Windoze.
/sarcasm off.
20 posted on
02/01/2005 9:13:55 AM PST by
taxed2death
(A few billion here, a few trillion there...we're all friends right?)
To: Paradox
Pretty soon we'll have enough computing power to get THIS:
![](http://showcase.netins.net/web/aioka/bluescreen.jpg)
24 posted on
02/01/2005 9:19:36 AM PST by
Paradox
(Occam was probably right.)
To: Paradox
HP (up $0.25 to $19.59, Research) said in a statement that the technology could result in computers that are thousands of times more powerful than those that exist today.![](http://www.entopia2002.com/screenshots/dvd/startrek4_scotty_mac.jpg)
"Computer.........."
25 posted on
02/01/2005 9:19:57 AM PST by
AxelPaulsenJr
(Pray Daily For Our Troops and President Bush)
To: Paradox
Quantum computers are on the way, but it will be decades until they can work useful problems. Right now they are up to 7 atoms, and they will need millions of atoms to be practical.
26 posted on
02/01/2005 9:22:47 AM PST by
RightWhale
(Please correct if cosmic balance requires.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson