Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 02/01/2005 8:12:32 AM PST by Paradox
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Paradox

So I wonder when Jane will make her appearance.


2 posted on 02/01/2005 8:14:35 AM PST by aruanan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Paradox

How is this any different from the quantum computing R&D that IBM has been working on for years?


4 posted on 02/01/2005 8:16:11 AM PST by Future Snake Eater ("Stupid grandma leaver-outers!"--Tom Servo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Paradox
Is this the technical development that will finally give me my jet pack?

5 posted on 02/01/2005 8:16:47 AM PST by atomicpossum (I am the Cat that walks by himself, and all places are alike to me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Paradox
A key patent behind this:

6,586,965 - Molecular crossbar latch
Inventor(s) Kuekes; Phillip J. (Menlo Park, CA)
Assignee(s) and Licensee(s) Hewlett Packard Company
USPTO Info at USPTO
Date Granted 2003-07-01
Country USA
Description A molecular crossbar latch is provided, comprising two control wires and a signal wire that crosses the two control wires at a non-zero angle to thereby form a junction with each control wire. Each junction forms a switch and the junction has a functional dimension in nanometers. The signal wire selectively has at least two different voltage states, ranging from a 0 state to a 1 state, wherein there is an asymmetry with respect to the direction of current flow from the signal wire through one junction compared to another junction such that current flowing through one junction into (out of) the signal wire can open (close) while current flowing through the other junction out of (into) the signal wire can close (open) the switch, and wherein there is a voltage threshold for switching between an open switch and a closed switch. Further, methods are provided for latching logic values onto nanowires in a logic array, for inverting a logic value, and for restoring a voltage value of a signal in a nano-scale wire.

7 posted on 02/01/2005 8:22:40 AM PST by ThePythonicCow (Welcome home, Vietnam Vets.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Paradox

This could be the next "bubble memory"!


9 posted on 02/01/2005 8:24:04 AM PST by AppyPappy (If You're Not A Part Of The Solution, There's Good Money To Be Made In Prolonging The Problem.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Paradox

Does this mean that I have to throw out my 8-track now?


10 posted on 02/01/2005 8:24:57 AM PST by reagan_fanatic (Rap - the other Disco)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Paradox
Reverse engineered from Roswell

11 posted on 02/01/2005 8:25:32 AM PST by evets (God bless president George W. Bush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Paradox

When I went to school the hot topic was submicron gate lengths.


13 posted on 02/01/2005 8:29:23 AM PST by Jack of all Trades
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Paradox
the technology could result in computers that are thousands of times more powerful than those that exist today.

Useless, as long as we have to continue using Microcrap operating systems.

15 posted on 02/01/2005 8:36:54 AM PST by clee1 (Islam is a deadly plague; liberalism is the AIDS virus that prevents us from defending ourselves.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Paradox

how long before they start making biological ones?


17 posted on 02/01/2005 8:41:51 AM PST by the invisib1e hand ("What are you gonna believe, the media, or your own eyes?" -- Marx .............(Groucho))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Paradox

"said in a statement that the technology could result in computers that are thousands of times more powerful than those that exist today."


No doubt, running on Windoze.


/sarcasm off.


20 posted on 02/01/2005 9:13:55 AM PST by taxed2death (A few billion here, a few trillion there...we're all friends right?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Paradox
Pretty soon we'll have enough computing power to get THIS:


24 posted on 02/01/2005 9:19:36 AM PST by Paradox (Occam was probably right.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Paradox
HP (up $0.25 to $19.59, Research) said in a statement that the technology could result in computers that are thousands of times more powerful than those that exist today.

"Computer.........."

25 posted on 02/01/2005 9:19:57 AM PST by AxelPaulsenJr (Pray Daily For Our Troops and President Bush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Paradox

Quantum computers are on the way, but it will be decades until they can work useful problems. Right now they are up to 7 atoms, and they will need millions of atoms to be practical.


26 posted on 02/01/2005 9:22:47 AM PST by RightWhale (Please correct if cosmic balance requires.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson