Posted on 10/25/2004 4:20:31 PM PDT by quidnunc
In Saturday's Guardian, Charlie concluded his analysis of the presidential election thus: "On November 2, the entire civilised world will be praying, praying Bush loses. And Sod's law dictates he'll probably win, thereby disproving the existence of God once and for all. The world will endure four more years of idiocy, arrogance and unwarranted bloodshed, with no benevolent deity to watch over and save us. John Wilkes Booth, Lee Harvey Oswald, John Hinckley Jr where are you now that we need you?"
Well, wherever they are, they're probably saying: "Why bring us into it? When ol' Lee Harvey decided it was time for JFK to get assassinated, he didn't sit around whining, 'John Wilkes Booth, where are you now that I need you?' Get off your butt and do it yourself, you big Euro-pussy."
But, with the armchair insurgents of the Euro-Left, it's always got to be someone else who straps on the old Semtex belt and waddles off to do the deed. For your average Leftie columnist, the vicarious frisson is more than delicious enough. Anything else would interfere with dinner plans.
By the weekend, the Guardian had thought through the implications of Brooker's comments, and decided that it would be rather embarrassing to be flying in the lucky winners of the big Clark County competition for their US vacation only to discover, as the plane was diverted to Guantanamo, that the entire editorial staff had been placed on a Justice Department watch list. So in re Charlie Wilkes Harvey Brooker, they issued a clarification: "Charlie Brooker apologises for any offence caused by his comments. Although flippant and tasteless, his closing comments were intended as an ironic joke, not as a call to action
-snip-
(Excerpt) Read more at telegraph.co.uk ...
Technically, it means "to shock the middle class" but IMHO that is way too polite a definition. It's when "the Anointed", the politically-hip, the leftist/socialist elitist artists, writers, white-wine-and-brie crowd deliberately do and say things that they know will upset that class of bores, of Philistines, of people simply too common for words (a.k.a. the middle class).
Example: When bonds were being sold for funding the Suez canal, a lot of middle class Frenchmen invested their saving in it. Well, that was enough to set the leftist against it. Not so much condemning it as making fun of it and the (middle class) who invested in it. The same was true with/during the construction of the Eiffel Tower. The bourgeois thought it was pretty nice. Well, that's all the elite leftist needed to condemn it non-stop.
And now the beheadings. Naturally it upsets the(despised) middle class, and so, naturally, it triggers the "epater le bourgeois" attitude in the New Left.
The man is a Machine!!
("Welcome to the real world, Neo")
No indeed. It also expresses itself in the open hope that the fellow who humiliated you by accomplishing something while you stood there cringing will be rewarded with a bloody nose.
It is precisely the sort of decadence and passivity that watched as the Nazis came marching into power. I am reminded of Caberet here. The Nazis may have had the guns, but those who knew better had all the good jokes. And the culture, and the money, and the freedom, at least until all three were taken away from them at the point of a bayonet.
FMCDH(BITS)
The poster's claim is Copyright Infringement, which I'm sure no one here would disagree with. The problem is, 99% of what said poster excerpts are written by people who don't care, and like the exposure they get here. It's an A/R thing.
FMCDH(BITS)
Steyn is a genius. He nails it again!
Another major consideration is that if we play by the rules and only excerpt then publishing organmizations like Gannett won't be motivated to prohibit FR from posting any of their content.
Nor being able to post from Gannett is depriving us of a lot of really good stuff.
Psst -- over here. Per our speculation over the weekend, Mr. Steyn does not disappoint!
Indeed. "All that is needed for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing" And Kerry and HIS ilk in Europe would do NOTHING. That is, as Kerry said, until we are attacked. Well, Ketchup Boy, we have been attacked and President Bush is DOING something about it! Now sit down and shut up. Nov. 2nd I intend to hand you a chair!!
Yeah. Right.
FMCDH(BITS)
bttt
"What if Fox news "joked" that way about Kerry?"
Better contrast would be if our rag papers were to attack their Queen. Just really poor taste and unforgiveable.
Exquisite!
The site telegraph.co.uk is not on the no-no list.
When Alec Baldwin called for Henry Hyde's family to be killed, was he being "flippant" or "ironic"?
I know. I doesn't matter to the Q...see my earlier posts.
FMCDH(BITS)
Silly you! Don't you recognize nuance when you see it?
BTTT
Yeah...follow the UN...in effect...do nothing...it's about oil and bribes IMHO...no one in Europe or anywhere else (including the American Democratic Party) seems to care when thousands of black Africans are being executed systematically...Clinton stood by while over 800,000 people in Rwanda were slaughtered...but black America still loves him...go figure...it always seems to be follow the money...if Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton and Louis Farrakhan get bought off the average black American gets the word and the trickle down bribe money trumps the lives of African people...it's about greed...not conscience...the Democratic Party is a criminal enterprise that stands for nothing but money...even killing babies is a $1 billion a year industry/ sacred cow.
Thanks for un-quidnuncing this post.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.