Posted on 10/20/2004 5:03:51 AM PDT by TBBT
Zogby still shows it tied. I was hoping for a 1 or 2 point uptick for Bush since one weekend day has rolled off. Wonder were it will be when Sunday rolls off?....
Thank you Thank you Thank you....I have been asking for that Opinion Dynamics poll for an hour. Just as reported dead on 48 48 , now has W up by 7...Nahhh Nahhh Nahhh Nahhh..........Nahhhh Nahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh
Paragraphs are your friends.
You: on the forum for 18 days
ClintonBeGone: on the forum for six years
You'd be better served to sit back and observe instead of acting like a nitwit, KwasiOwusu.
Fox was closer than Zogby in 2000, as was CBS and Harris.
See this:
http://members.cox.net/fweil/FinalPolls2000.html
I have been on DU for longer than here....does that make me a highly repected DIM?
Zogby was dead-on accurate in 2000. Few others pollsters were even in the neighborhood, yet he predicted the election nearly perfectly.
Fox was dead on in 2000 with a 48-48 tie. They even had Nader almost dead on. Zogby was off by 2 for Bush and Nader.
Thanks! I didn't know about FOX. I wonder why they are not included.
Geeez Nittany....you must have missed everything that been said here.....suggest you go back over all the previous discussion comments and get up to speed...reagardless of how long you been on this format
Zogby was not dead on. his predictions was 46 bush 48 Gore 5 Nader. CBS,Fox , and Harris were closer than Zogby.
BTW Nittany, being on this forum for X amount of years is no guarantee of "enlightenment" With some people ignorance and stupidity are terminal
The numbers do not lie. Though you might prefer to ignore the facts, that won't make them go away. Zog was 2pts off. CBS & Harris were closer, In this universe being wrong means that you are not in fact 'dead on'. You can play pretend all you like, but you are just fooling yourself.
Zogby is a twister of data....that's all I can say.
I'm only going by what the professionals say about Zogby. If you consider that many of the 'popular votes' were rigged for Gore, it might be worse.
You know, the Clintons sort of created a monster by polling and taking focus group analysis and etc. Maybe we on the Right should avoid attributing such great power and influence to the pollsters...?
Unless they favor our side considerably and make us feel good, I mean.
Beats me. But I have a problem when I see posters with two-week-old accounts accusing longtime members of being Democrat plants. Show the other poster the error in their argument, if you can. But the ad hominems are a nonstarter, particularly coming from recently-joined posters.
I never stated it was a guarantee. What I stated is that I have a problem with new posters who appears incapable of anything other than ad hominem attacks.
Nice strawman, though.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.