[NittanyLion]

The point is, Zogby has not been right on since 96. CBS and Harris have their own problems, but the idea that Zogby is the gold-standard is ludicrous.

Zogby was dead-on accurate in 2000. Few others pollsters were even in the neighborhood, yet he predicted the election nearly perfectly.

[traderrob6]

Geeez Nittany....you must have missed everything that been said here.....suggest you go back over all the previous discussion comments and get up to speed...reagardless of how long you been on this format

[finnman69]

Zogby was not dead on. his predictions was 46 bush 48 Gore 5 Nader. CBS,Fox , and Harris were closer than Zogby.

[KwasiOwusu]

"Zogby was dead-on accurate in 2000. Few others pollsters were even in the neighborhood, yet he predicted the election nearly perfectly" Wrong again. He was wrong on what votes Bush was going to get by 2%. He only got Al Gores votes right. Plus, as has been pointed out over a 100 times to to you two clowns from DUnderground, Harris and CBS did much better in predicting the 2000 polls than Zogby did. Get it?

[traderrob6]

BTW Nittany, being on this forum for X amount of years is no guarantee of "enlightenment" With some people ignorance and stupidity are terminal

[MMkennedy]

The numbers do not lie. Though you might prefer to ignore the facts, that won't make them go away. Zog was 2pts off. CBS & Harris were closer, In this universe being wrong means that you are not in fact 'dead on'. You can play pretend all you like, but you are just fooling yourself.