Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

GIs who refused job had unarmored trucks
courier press ^ | 10 17 04 | JIM KRANE

Posted on 10/17/2004 2:40:08 PM PDT by freepatriot32

BAGHDAD, Iraq (AP) -- The U.S. Army Reserve soldiers who refused orders to drive a dangerous route were members of one of a few supply units whose trucks are still unarmored, their commanding general said Sunday.

The soldiers, now under investigation, had previously focused on local missions in safer parts of southern Iraq and had never driven a convoy north along the attack-prone roads passing through Baghdad.

"Not all of their trucks are completely armored. In their case, they haven't had the chance to get armored," said Brig. Gen. James E. Chambers, commanding general of 13th Corps Support Command, which sends some 250 convoys ferrying Army fuel, food and ammunition across Iraq each day.

Chambers, speaking at a press conference in Baghdad, said the 18 soldiers involved in the incident had returned to duty and it was "too early" to determine if any will undergo disciplinary action.

He said a pair of investigations are examining the soldiers' disobedience as well as their allegations that the trucks were unfit for the hazardous journey. He declined to discuss particulars, citing the soldiers' rights.

Chambers said 80 percent of the 13th Coscom's 4,000 trucks have been fitted with custom steel plate, but some of those in the unit that balked, the 343rd Quartermaster Company, were among the last left unarmored, because the unit's mission normally confines it to a less dangerous part of Iraq.

None of the 13th Coscom's trucks arrived in Iraq with armor. Since February, the unit's engineers and private contractors have been working in impromptu maintenance yards to weld heavy metal "boxes" over truck cabs.

Chambers said the 18 soldiers who refused the mission on Wednesday morning - driving seven fuel tankers from Tallil air base near Nasiriyah to Taji north of Baghdad - also appeared to have also balked at their mission because of the trucks' bad condition.

"They were concerned about the maintenance," Chambers said. "If there is a maintenance issue, we'll clear it up."

Chambers downplayed the incident, saying the disobedience not indicative of wider U.S. Army morale or maintenance problems. The 18 soldiers were "moved to a separate location" for questioning and have all since returned to duty, the general said.

But Chambers did not downplay the danger of driving Iraq's roads, a job that has become the equivalent of front-line combat with Iraq's insurgency, whose deadliest weapon is the hidden roadside bomb.

"In Jim Chambers' opinion, the most dangerous job in Iraq is driving a truck," he said. Soldiers take their missions realizing "it's not if, but when, they will be attacked."

The Army announced last week it was investigating up to 19 members of a platoon from the 343rd Quartermaster Company based in Rock Hill, South Carolina.

On Wednesday, 19 members of the platoon did not show up for a scheduled 7 a.m. meeting in Tallil to prepare for the fuel convoy's departure a few hours later, a military statement said.

The general said a pair of investigations were already under way, and said there were just 18 soldiers whose actions were being probed.

The first investigation, overseen by the 13th Coscom's inspector general and deputy commander, is looking into maintenance and safety practices at the Talil air base, where the 343rd is based.

The second, headed by the commander of the 300th Area Support Group, has ordered a criminal inquiry to determine if any soldiers committed crimes under the Uniform Code of Military Justice, and, if so, whether disciplinary measures are warranted.

"Based on our investigations, other actions may be necessary," Chambers said.

As a result of the incident, the entire 343rd is in the midst of a two-week "stand down," bolting on new armor and upgrading maintenance on its vehicles. The 18 soldiers under investigation must complete additional training and win re-certification to regain permission to perform convoy missions, Chambers said.

He said the incident and ongoing maintenance pause had no effects on supplying the U.S. military here. The 21-vehicle convoy still made the run Wednesday, albeit late.

The 15,000 troops under Chambers' command - almost 90 percent of whom are Reservists or National Guard soldiers - have completed 75,000 convoy missions covering the length and breadth of Iraq and suffered 26 killed since April, Chambers said. No members of the 343rd have been killed in Iraq in the nine months they've been here, the general said.

He denied claims by some of the soldiers to their families that the fuel they were to deliver was contaminated. The platoon has troops from Alabama, Kentucky, North Carolina, Mississippi and South Carolina.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Extended News; Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: anamericansoldier; gis; had; iraq; job; recruits; refused; taji; trucks; unarmored; warlist; who
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-77 last
To: aft_lizard

ROFL!! My bro got a "SH** BURNER" medal from one of his soldiers. He said he never thought he would be excited to see a portapotty but he was ecstatic.


61 posted on 10/17/2004 5:03:18 PM PDT by StarCMC (It's God's job to forgive Bin Laden; it's our job to arrange the meeting.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Jazzy

I agree. Sad that a soldier calls home to whine to her family instead of performing her duty. I will wait for the results of the investigation. From the news conference I saw nothing to be too concerned with. Time will tell.


62 posted on 10/17/2004 5:04:47 PM PDT by tioga
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: StarCMC

Before I joined the military I though sh*t burning detail was a urban legend I was wrong when I was standing in the desert stirring the pot as you will. Amazingly poop burns down to almost nothing.


63 posted on 10/17/2004 5:06:06 PM PDT by aft_lizard (Actually i voted for John Kerry before I voted against him.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: aft_lizard

One of those things a civilian never thinks about! Thanks for doing all that you did -- including burning the poop!


64 posted on 10/17/2004 5:08:23 PM PDT by StarCMC (It's God's job to forgive Bin Laden; it's our job to arrange the meeting.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: Inkie

The same attitude exhibited by these people existed in my sons
maintenence unit in the NG at Ft. Hood recently.

Finally the CO appointed an Lt. who was filled with religious fervor and believed that the laying on of hands solved such
wayward behavior.

Attitude corrected.


65 posted on 10/17/2004 5:16:21 PM PDT by ijcr (Age and treachery will always overcome youth and ability.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: TNdandelion
The real shame is good soldiers are fighting and dying for our comfy home while this group took a pass.

These folks are not under civilian law. Looks like they got some press to stir things up. It will only hurt them in the end. I've been present during courts-martial proceedings. They don't take to kindly to civilian lawyers.

What happened here is a fundamental breakdown of military discipline. It CANNOT/and WILLNOT go unpunished.

Some of these folks may get off with an ART 15 but anyone who is senior will more than likely feel the wrath of military justice.

Or as they say "They will be making big ones into little ones."
66 posted on 10/17/2004 5:16:22 PM PDT by PJammers (PJihadi! Pa Ja Ack Ba!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: micah74

Yep, an Army of Me.


67 posted on 10/17/2004 5:19:55 PM PDT by TonyM (E)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: PJammers
From the get-go when this story first broke, and throughout -- the group "didn't show up" for their 7am appoint to convey to the appointment mission spot. Meaning, they were AWOL, no? And yes, the rest -- armored/unarmored.. contaminated diesel or not.. stand-downs, I understand.

However, through all the threads, this is what continued to get me -- the group didn't show up for their 7am appointment to begin the convoy. We can all count on the media and most people missing this VERY IMPORTANT DETAIL. Doesn't matter about the condition of the trucks -- that would have been a standard "stand down" issue. But this group DID NOT SHOW UP at the "ordered" time. Period. Therefore they were AWOL. no?

68 posted on 10/17/2004 5:42:05 PM PDT by Alia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: freepatriot32
"an sandbags stop ak 47 bullets what about mortor shrapnel?"

My dad was in a sea-bee battalion in Vietnam and they used to put sand bags on everything.. bulldozers, graders, dump trucks.. everything. Everyone used to put put sand bags in the floors of M113's and those things had autotrans's and the transmissions would burn up in a couple of hundred miles

"I never heard of anyone doing that before but if it is effective they should all do it and save a ton of money armor plating the trucks with reenforced steel and kevlar."

In Israel there is a company that already makes composite armor for most US military vehicles. From what I read the are preshaped for inside the panels and pretty much bolt in... of course we could not use those.. they are made by the "Jews" and would upset the Arab masses.
69 posted on 10/17/2004 5:42:40 PM PDT by JSteff
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: charleston1

"They also routinely sandbagged APCs, specifically the M113"

yeah they did but in Vietnam they were burning up the auto-transmissions because of the extra weight. Maybe they got better tranies since them.


70 posted on 10/17/2004 5:46:17 PM PDT by JSteff
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: verity

"What does an 'uparmored' fuel tanker look like? ;~)"

Like a diamond head (strike anywhere) match.. you just need to strike it.


71 posted on 10/17/2004 5:51:49 PM PDT by JSteff
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: freepatriot32

Check http://www.rantburg.com for the latest article regarding the Reservists, their arguments and their vehichles.


Jack.


72 posted on 10/17/2004 5:52:12 PM PDT by Jack Deth (Mostly Harmless)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PJammers
"Innocent until proven guilty." If anyone deserves this...it would be our men and women serving in combat.

I am not saying that they should not be punished if they have done something wrong...but at least give the authorities enough time to investigate what happened and PROVE them wrong before bringing the hammer down on them. Is that too much to ask?

73 posted on 10/17/2004 7:04:30 PM PDT by TNdandelion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: lt.america

I talked to a REAL oldtimer in the Army about the way they ran convoys back "in the day". First, he said, remove all glass from the vehicle. Might not get hit directly, but get sprayed with shattered glass. Not good. Then, sandbags on the floor. _Wet_ sandbags, as dry sand isn't nearly as effective. If there's enough double layers of wet sandbags, the carrying capacity of the truck is reduced considerably, but that's the deal. He also explained how he once ran a combo of 90 wt. gear oil and gasoline in lieu of diesel, which was unavailable for some reason. "Smoked like hell, but it worked." Motor T.


74 posted on 10/17/2004 7:12:02 PM PDT by Freedom4US
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: TNdandelion

That is what a COURT MARTIAL is for. It's a trial aimed at getting the "full story."


75 posted on 10/17/2004 8:12:03 PM PDT by Inkie (Surround Fallujia and start shooting.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: mylife
The papers are beating this story ro death

I'm sort of underwhelmed.

I was expecting one of the "moms" stateside to release an e-mailed .jpg of
these soldiers in a naked dog-pile.

Oh well, there's still time for someone to mock one up and fax it from the
Abilene, TX Kinkos to Dan Rather and Mary Mapes.
76 posted on 10/17/2004 8:14:27 PM PDT by VOA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: PJammers

I would love to know where they went to Basic Training at?

When I was in the service the most unmilitary new soldiers had almost one thing in common.

Ft Jackson Basic.

Our leadership is excellent, our NCO corps is outstanding for the most part and most of our troops is motivated professional soldiers BUT IMO Traddoc has failed with all the changes to basic training since Clinton took office.

Take all whiners and pantywaists over there back to an old fashioned wooden barracks combat arms basic training with no exceptions for political correctness or gender.

Fort Chaffee Arkansas or Fort McCoy Wisconson would be excellent sites to retrain Ft Jackson mistakes then return them to Iraq after they learn to take orders.


77 posted on 10/17/2004 11:38:06 PM PDT by Swiss
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-77 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson