Posted on 10/06/2004 12:11:25 AM PDT by JohnHuang2
Edited on 10/06/2004 12:11:55 AM PDT by Admin Moderator. [history]
Wednesday, October 6, 2004
Cheney creamed Edwards
Posted: October 6, 2004
1:00 a.m. Eastern
By Hugh Hewitt
© 2004 WorldNetDaily.com
Vice President Dick Cheney creamed John Edwards last night, but not because John Edwards was inarticulate. Edwards was very articulate. Not responsive, but articulate. Just like you would expect of a trial lawyer, but not of a vice president in time of war.
Mary Beth Cahill looked stricken when she appeared with Chris Wallace at 8:00 p.m. The campaign manager for Kerry was upset that John Kerry's 20 years in the United States Senate was back on the table, and that Edwards near invisible record in the United States Senate was also fodder for the vice president's repeated attacks on the Democratic ticket.
Cheney wrote some notes when he came out before the debate began. I think they must have said:
"Global test."
"If you had had your way, the troops wouldn't have what they have."
"I could use a lot for words to describe Sen. Kerry's record on Iraq, but consistent isn't one of them."
"The threat. The threat. The threat."
It is this last theme which led to Cheney's domination of the young and affable trial lawyer. Americans hate that their soldiers, sailors, airmen and Marines are in harm's way. But voters understand the threat and the vice president repeatedly reminded them of it.
This electorate is also scornful of talking points and non-responsive answers. Over and over again, Edwards refused to answer direct questions. And when Edwards was disdainful of the Iraqi sacrifices for their freedom, Cheney tore him up. That will leave a mark.
The spin broke decisively for Cheney just as the delayed analysis of last Thursday has come around to understanding that Kerry blundered badly, but that Bush didn't. "Global test" defined Kerry more than all the ads to date run by Bush-Cheney, and tonight hammered it home: You cannot trust John Kerry to wage the war that needs to be waged, to demand the weapons that need to be produced, to inspire the American people to support a victory strategy.
If you can't stand up to Howard Dean, how in the world can you stand up to al-Qaida, indeed. John Kerry couldn't even stand up to Michael Moore, the prince of his nominating convention.
John Kerry didn't get a bounce from Thursday he got an anchor around his neck, one he put there. John Edwards couldn't do anything to get that anchor off. We'll watch it sink Kerry for the next four weeks, regardless of Friday night's and next week's debates.
It isn't about looking good. It is about leading the war.
Cheney wrote some notes when he came out before the debate began.
Did anyone notice than when the Silky Pony sneak a cheat peak at thos notes? His head never moved but his eyes blazed right into the paper. Check out the replays, it's amazing.
Oh please tell me what happened!
Please..............
The up and coming black woman was better than that smug PBS hack Jim Lehrer. And as far as I know Gwen is liberal and I did not look forward to her moderating.
I watched the debate on C-Span and assume their coverage was the "raw video" you describe. The format for the entire debate was split screen showing both gentlemen. After about 30 minutes, I became distracted by Edwards constant movements, writing and repeated underlining, and ripping off sheets paper from his notepad. At that point, whenever Vice President Cheney spoke, I basically watched just one side of my screen, trying my best to ignore Edwards' boisterous behavior.
Amen to that! I thought Cheney did a great job....
According to Finger Pointers Anonymous, it's something they suggest for their Finger Pointing addicts who find they cannot quit cold turkey.
I saw Marybeth Cahill, and Hewitt is spot - on.
Also, some guy walked off Hannity's show when Kerry's Senate record was being hammered.
They either don't know the extent of the Senate records of their ticket, or they really and truly thought nobody would bring it up.
I am perplexed.
From the article:
"The threat. The threat. The threat."
It is this last theme which led to Cheney's domination of the young and affable trial lawyer. Americans hate that their soldiers, sailors, airmen and Marines are in harm's way. But voters understand the threat and the vice president repeatedly reminded them of it.
This electorate is also scornful of talking points and non-responsive answers. Over and over again, Edwards refused to answer direct questions. And when Edwards was disdainful of the Iraqi sacrifices for their freedom, Cheney tore him up. That will leave a mark.
Here is the FULL version of that.
Think of John Edwards as a baby seal who won't be ordering Canadian Club for a LONG time after this debate.
I sat on my couch for a good 30 seconds - stunned by magnitude of Cheney's tirade against Edwards in that moment. Then I laughed for at least 10. What a debate. Cheney kicked his butt.
Hopefully, this is according to the typical Bush "rope-a-dope" plan. It works consistently with the democrats.
I agree with you completely. Some described VP Cheney as monotone and boring. I thought he was great. He never got upset, never excited, just stated the facts.
I'd want him to have my back any day.
Vice President Cheney at his lunch, cleaned his clock, and swept his floor with his ar$e.
The Kerry / Edwards Team is . .
My question for Kerry-Edwards: does Israel too have to pass a "global test" in defending itself? If it does, it will be obliterated in 20 minutes or less.
B-C should run with this aggressively in Miami, NYC, Philly, all cities with substantial Jewish populations. Anyone agree?
That was a good one, too!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.