Skip to comments.
Per FoxNews: Pentagon questioning PO Box Number
FoxNews
| 10 SEP 2004
| me
Posted on 09/10/2004 11:09:40 AM PDT by aft_lizard
James Rosen just reported that the Pentagon questions the use of a PO Box on a memo, and that the PO Box may never have been used by that unit saying it seems highly unlikely that they would have PO Box containing sequential numbers. Standard military practice has always been to place the actual physical address on the letter head.
TOPICS: Breaking News
KEYWORDS: 60minutes; bush; cbs; communistparty; danrather; forgerie; forgery; fraud; liar; napalminthemorning; nationalguard; pobox34567; rathergate; selectricgate
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-80, 81-100, 101-120 ... 301-310 next last
To: aft_lizard
...and I see your schwartz is as big as mine.
81
posted on
09/10/2004 11:30:15 AM PDT
by
NativeNewYorker
(Don't blame me. I voted for Sharpton.)
To: aft_lizard
this whole thingy is approaching "Ludicrous Speed"
LOL
The Capt.
82
posted on
09/10/2004 11:31:39 AM PDT
by
Capt.YankeeMike
(get outta my pocket, outta my car, and outta the schools)
To: BykrBayb
I'm having so much fun today! :-)
The longer Dan Rather holds out, the longer the story will play out.
Talk about being blown up by his own petard.
As joesnuffy said:
Bubba basically in the name of kinship hands Kerry an exploding cigar
To: Poohbah; aft_lizard; Daus
Seen Thumb Wars?
"...I am ..... YOUR MOTHER!"
Sorry to get off topic. Does feel like we're up against the dark helmet man, though.
84
posted on
09/10/2004 11:32:03 AM PDT
by
Hi Heels
To: aft_lizard
Standard military practice has always been to place the actual physical address on the letter head.Like "12345 Qwerty Street".
85
posted on
09/10/2004 11:32:07 AM PDT
by
snarkpup
To: aft_lizard
Funny, you don't look Druish.
86
posted on
09/10/2004 11:32:28 AM PDT
by
NativeNewYorker
(Don't blame me. I voted for Sharpton.)
To: aft_lizard
What I find so incredibly unbelievable is that no other documents are available from Killian from the same timeframe, so that a comparison can be made.
87
posted on
09/10/2004 11:32:33 AM PDT
by
SGCOS
To: IamConservative
It increases exponentially. A logarithmic curve is decreasingly positive along its length. =)
88
posted on
09/10/2004 11:33:12 AM PDT
by
Styria
To: Sacajaweau
P.O. Box OLD-MEDIA54321BOOM!
89
posted on
09/10/2004 11:33:27 AM PDT
by
AmericanInTokyo
(ANY U.S. Soldier's Blood Worth Tiptoeing ANYMORE Around Middle Eastern "Holy" Cities or Mosques???)
To: Daus
Obscure SpaceBalls reference.
Not obscure at all. If I remember correctly it was ...
One! (Anguished pregnant pause)
Two! (Another anguished look with a contorted face and an extended period of contemplation)
Three!
90
posted on
09/10/2004 11:33:34 AM PDT
by
tang-soo
(Prophecy of the Seventy Weeks - Read Daniel Chapter 9)
To: maeng; ValerieUSA; txflake; WinOne4TheGipper; DrewsDad; HiJinx; MeekOneGOP; Gracey; anymouse; ...
91
posted on
09/10/2004 11:33:39 AM PDT
by
Arrowhead1952
(Charter member of the VRWC - and proud of it.)
To: IamConservative
Yesterday was the best day on FR in a long time. It harkens back to the days of Quidum, blue dresses, DNA, the meaning of IS. You know, this just may be the work of the "men in gray suits"!
92
posted on
09/10/2004 11:35:26 AM PDT
by
Seeking the truth
( www.0cents.com - Whom Would Terrorists Vote For? T/Shirt)
To: Always Right
Proportional type is impossible with a typewriter. So is the centering that they did. Also the use of a lowercase 'L' for a one, which is just a way to trick MS Word into not superscripting '1st'. There is more evidence here of forgery than their was for murder at the OJ trail. Sorry, but you are not correct. The IBM Executive model, which was in common use during the 1970s, was capable of all of these things. It was famous for having proportional typing capabilities. Centering was as simple as setting a tab stop and using the correct keys to backspace half of the line length.
Now, would anyone go to this trouble for a memo? I doubt it. And I do think the docs are forged. But let's all stay clear on the real evidence, and not end up falling into a trap here.
To: Old Professer
My signature is more flamboyant on a good day!!
94
posted on
09/10/2004 11:36:54 AM PDT
by
Sacajaweau
(God Bless Our Troops!!)
To: george wythe
Another joke I found buried in the documents is the subject of one of the memos: "CYA."Agreed. CYA was left as the "clue" by the forger. This use of the term is too modern.
95
posted on
09/10/2004 11:37:04 AM PDT
by
TaxRelief
(If only the Pentagon had run those WMD memos past Buckhead.)
To: aft_lizard
forgive the pun, but this whole thing looks "bush-league."
The opposition hates GW so bad, they've lost all sense of reason and judgement. Reminds me of Captain Queeg. I'll bet lot's of marbles are rolling at the DNC.
To: aft_lizard
Anybody keeping a list of all the forgery indicators?
'cuz it seems like these guys may be responsible
97
posted on
09/10/2004 11:38:12 AM PDT
by
najida
(Sometimes I feel like a nut, sometimes I am.)
To: Non-Sequitur
Even dumber than my brother-in-law, and that's saying a lot. You think your brother-in-law's dumb? Sight unseen I'll gladly trade you my brother-in-law and a case of your favorite adult beverage for him.
To: Cogadh na Sith
Don't aviation units in all services use the name of their airfield as their location? A squadron is a relatively small unit and I think it unlikely to have had multiple HQs. What AFB did the 111th fly out of? And wouldn't that,rather than a Houston PO Box, be their address?
99
posted on
09/10/2004 11:38:45 AM PDT
by
xkaydet65
(" You have never tasted freedom my friend, else you would know, it is purchased not with gold, but w)
To: Viet-Boat-Rider
Lol, Love that address:
"Texas Air National Guard
P. O. Box 234567 HangRather, Texas"
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-80, 81-100, 101-120 ... 301-310 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson