Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Per FoxNews: Pentagon questioning PO Box Number
FoxNews | 10 SEP 2004 | me

Posted on 09/10/2004 11:09:40 AM PDT by aft_lizard

James Rosen just reported that the Pentagon questions the use of a PO Box on a memo, and that the PO Box may never have been used by that unit saying it seems highly unlikely that they would have PO Box containing sequential numbers. Standard military practice has always been to place the actual physical address on the letter head.


TOPICS: Breaking News
KEYWORDS: 60minutes; bush; cbs; communistparty; danrather; forgerie; forgery; fraud; liar; napalminthemorning; nationalguard; pobox34567; rathergate; selectricgate
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 301-310 next last
To: Howlin
In 1991, Ashland Chemical Company, A Division of Ashland Oil, Incorporated, P. O. Box 34567, Houston

I do, however, question the use of the number in early 1970s.

41 posted on 09/10/2004 11:19:39 AM PDT by rit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: RetroSexual
To me, this is a stronger indication of a forgery than the whole proportional type business.

Proportional type is impossible with a typewriter. So is the centering that they did. Also the use of a lowercase 'L' for a one, which is just a way to trick MS Word into not superscripting '1st'. There is more evidence here of forgery than their was for murder at the OJ trail.

42 posted on 09/10/2004 11:19:39 AM PDT by Always Right
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: longtermmemmory

I suggested that yesterday, all they need to do is contact that unit and find out if they still have there old QM logs from that era, case solved.


43 posted on 09/10/2004 11:19:40 AM PDT by aft_lizard (I actually voted for John Kerry before I voted against him)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: aft_lizard

Whoa! How'd I miss that!!??

44 posted on 09/10/2004 11:19:45 AM PDT by struwwelpeter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hchutch
Eight Harpoons have just slammed into the SS Kerry-Edwards 2004.

It would've only been five, except the CIWS kept flip-flopping about which Harpoon to engage first (c8

45 posted on 09/10/2004 11:20:01 AM PDT by Poohbah (If you're not living on the edge, you're taking up too much room.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: oolatec

My God! How stupid can they be? I mean six weeks and no one questioned this address which is the most obvious red flag of all. How bad did they have to want to run this to ignore it?


46 posted on 09/10/2004 11:20:13 AM PDT by tiki (Win one against the Flipper)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: rawhide

I checked this out. The same address appears on a legit Bush military form, but it is for the 147th Fighter Interceptor GROUP. While that might be real address for the Group, this same address on the fake Bush docs is at the top of the page for the SQUADRON. Why would the squadron have the same P.O. Box as the Group? Can any former ANG people help me out on this one? My units never used P.O. Boxes.


47 posted on 09/10/2004 11:20:23 AM PDT by Hank All-American (Free Men, Free Minds, Free Markets baby!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: July 4th

It just keeps on giving. In the meantime, John Kerry's 20 year record is again "lying low" and it's just back to just plain Bush-bashing.


48 posted on 09/10/2004 11:20:30 AM PDT by Sacajaweau (God Bless Our Troops!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: aft_lizard

sheesh tell the Pentagon to have someone check FR


http://www.usatoday.com/news/bushdocs/10-2_2000_Personnel_File.pdf

see page 16 of these official docs...zip is 77034 post office box 34567 is listed on letterhead...


49 posted on 09/10/2004 11:20:43 AM PDT by rolling_stone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Daus
It appears to be a valid box number, at least currently.

PO BOX 34567
HOUSTON TX 77234-4567
Carrier Route: B006
County: HARRIS
Delivery Point: 67
Check Digit: 2
50 posted on 09/10/2004 11:20:53 AM PDT by SOSCEO
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: aft_lizard
Dan Blather

I swear the documents are real,
I’d never use a fake.
Killian must have set me up,
There must be some mistake.
Sure CBS will back me up,
I’m still their hottest gun.
Well no I didn’t ask his wife,
I do not know his son.
My daughter surely did no wrong,
For her dad’s Dan Rather.
George Bush wrote them to trick us all,
Now I’m in a lather.
I do not know what a font is,
How could I have used one?
When I made them they sure looked real,
What is New Times Roman?

Conspiracy Guy aka DIF 9/10/2004

51 posted on 09/10/2004 11:21:03 AM PDT by Conspiracy Guy (I can always tell when John Kerry is lying.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: aft_lizard

PO BOX 34567

Ms Agnes N. Tipis
Postal Corporation of Kenya
P.O. Box 34567
NAIROBI 00100
Tel: 254 2 243434 Ext.2167
Fax: 254 2 225276


52 posted on 09/10/2004 11:21:17 AM PDT by finnman69 (cum puella incedit minore medio corpore sub quo manifestus globus, inflammare animos)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: T Minus Four

I'm a mawg. Half man, half dog. I'm my own best friend!


53 posted on 09/10/2004 11:21:21 AM PDT by gracie1 (Where are we going and why are we in this handbasket?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: aft_lizard

BTTT


54 posted on 09/10/2004 11:21:25 AM PDT by Fiddlstix (This Tagline for sale. (Presented by TagLines R US))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Shermy
I can hear the phone call now:

"You did what? I hadn't found the actual address yet, so I just typed in a fake PO box as a placeholder. You weren't supposed to give those papers to them yet, you dumb****. This was supposed to be the approval phase, not the release phase."

"Oh."

55 posted on 09/10/2004 11:21:34 AM PDT by savedbygrace
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: RetroSexual

Yes, and some of the language is off too.


56 posted on 09/10/2004 11:21:59 AM PDT by firebrand
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: aft_lizard

Hard to believe that someone who went to the trouble of creating a forgery with intent to influence a presidential election(and thus knew the doc would be under intense scrutiny) would be so utterly stupid as to use a blatently fake number. Almost inconceivable, unless:

1) that is the actual po box, which someone at the Ellington Base decided to use because it was easy to remember

2) they wanted this to be caught as a forgery

tinfoil a) to sink the Kerry campaign and clear a path for Hillary

tinfoil b) GOP setup

tinfoil c) to create a Watergate-style faux-scandal where the Dems fake the doc, make it easy to spot as fake, then blame the GOP for faking it, which the media picks up and runs with, and then they start calling for defeating/impeaching and prosecuting President Bush. If they think they are too far down in the polls, why not a 'muddy the waters' Hail Mary?

If only a 'DNCthroat' would step forward....


57 posted on 09/10/2004 11:22:01 AM PDT by Diddle E. Squat ( "History? I love history! So sequential...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: struwwelpeter

I think the zero 0 in the date is even more outstanding. I don't know anyone who would write 01 at that point in time.


58 posted on 09/10/2004 11:23:08 AM PDT by Sacajaweau (God Bless Our Troops!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: rolling_stone

Looks like the address is OK. There's plenty of other evidence of forgery, though.


59 posted on 09/10/2004 11:23:13 AM PDT by MineralMan (godless atheist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: aft_lizard

"Standard military practice has always been to place the actual physical address on the letter head."

they did not even use a letterhead, but a typed address heading, without all the other heading info;

however, as it was a memo to himself going into his own deskdrawer, this would not be proof of a forgery.

He would have put the correct address on it, if he bothered to put an address header on it at all.


60 posted on 09/10/2004 11:23:59 AM PDT by AMDG&BVMH
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 301-310 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson