Posted on 09/09/2004 12:14:37 PM PDT by nyconse
Kimmer just announced that he would discuss the attacks on Pres. Bush. by see BS and said (no equivications)that the documents are fake. Kimmer is on WGST in ATlanta. Detail as I get them....
Somebody ping Howlin...if this posts doesn't do it...LOL
I agree with you but, assuming the documents are forged, I doubt that it will ever be reported to the American people. Clearly CBS will cover this up.
I fail to see where there is any accountability for the MSM.
Perhaps -- I hope -- I am missing something?
They were commonly interchangeable back in those days.
Kerry threw his forged boat over a document in the manner of Jengjis Caan (1st cousin to James, founder of the Frahnsh film festival, now patronized by Redford and Streisand) and recieved three puple hearts.
Did you know John Kerry was in Viet Nam ?
Hannity just took a call, where they discussed the details about nonexistant fonts in the 70's. And the topic continues...
This could be a "slam dunk" on Kerry RATHER than a effective campaign smear.
This should inspire someone to open a website domain name Kerry_Rather_Lies@CBS.com, DanRatherPartisan@CBS.com or something like that.
BTW - Hannity also announced that FReepers are great. Kudos to FReepers for getting this story going.
FReeper pride!
I hope they will at least be forced to out their document expert who claimed the docs were genuine.
Good I sent him every thread on the subject from Free Republic before his show started. I had to take my kids to soccer so I missed the show.
Kimmer is a great guy. Former Marine who hates Kerry.
The MSM will have to deal with the new media growing stronger because MSM keeps stumbling from its liberal bias.
This story could help us rename Kerry's middle name. From John Forbes Kerry to John Forged Kerry.
It would have been a 71Lima, propably E7 or lower...
Regards,
Raven6
Isn't kimmer the name on the document in question???
Yep. My theory too. There's nothing in these that contradicts Bush. The writer died in 1894 but it looks like these were created on a PC c.1980
I think they were transcribed from memory or contemporaneous notes. So, both sides may be right. The documents are not originals from 1973 but they are accurate.
They completely agree with the story that President Bush has always given.
OK, but supposedly the "author" of these documents died in 1984. Maybe he did have Microsoft Word 82 on his desktop computer. I guess I'll check out the website he was working on at the time. Or perhaps Dan Rather has Killian's Blackberry with the cell phone numbers programmed in.
Hey guys,
Hugh Hewitt is all over this. He had experts on...over 90% sure that these documents are forged. Freepers were mentioned on Hannity (thanks Howlin)...I heard that the blogs...(I hope I got this right) Powerline and INDCjournal.com are all over this...see BS stepped in it it this time. The question is who forged the documents? Carvile or Begala come to mind...Also, I heard on Hewit (caller) Killian's (guy who supposed wrote this may be mis-spelling his name) son is questioning these documents. ABC reported this... LOL We don't know how, we don't know when, but Kerry is behind this I be!
I just got back from cheerleading practice (daughter) and listened to the radio. Now CBS is not saying where they got these documents and apparently they may not even have originals? Yeah right...they also refuse to say who authenticated these documents if anyone did. This makes me think they came from a person See BS really trusted-perhaps a high placed Kerry operative or perhaps from Barnes himself...hm...what do you guys think?
The guy's son is on ABC, and he is questioning the authenticity of these documents. Where did CBS get them-inquiring minds want to know.
New media is on the way......to save the day.
My LTC typed all my official documentation cover letters/memos when I was an A1C.
For a few years,at HQ level, I thought LTCs were specially appointed due to their extraordinary typing skills.
ROTFLMAO!
i smell a sucker punch. it seems to me that it would be political death to use false documents unless it's to get the buzz about them started on both sides of the argument, then produce the actual documents saying that an underling made an "error in judgement". this would boost the attention the whole fiasco gets wouldn't it??
They already produced the "actual documents" according to them, so where are the actual actual documents? They only have first actual documents to run with........done deal, end of actual document story. They thought that the actual documents were good enough, can you imagine the hype if they produced the actual actual documents? Not gonna happen
Yep. My theory too. There's nothing in these that contradicts Bush. The writer died in 1894 but it looks like these were created on a PC c.1980
The writer died in 1894? but it looks like there were created on a PC c.1980???????????????????? Your point is?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.