Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Kimmer in Atlanta Just Announced Documents Used To Attack Bush Are Fakes!
09-09-2004 | me

Posted on 09/09/2004 12:14:37 PM PDT by nyconse

Kimmer just announced that he would discuss the attacks on Pres. Bush. by see BS and said (no equivications)that the documents are fake. Kimmer is on WGST in ATlanta. Detail as I get them....


TOPICS: Announcements; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: allyourfakes; arebelongtous; bush; democratlies; killian; kimmer
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-87 next last
To: Tannerone

Somebody ping Howlin...if this posts doesn't do it...LOL


61 posted on 09/09/2004 1:59:40 PM PDT by nyconse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: savedbygrace

I agree with you but, assuming the documents are forged, I doubt that it will ever be reported to the American people. Clearly CBS will cover this up.

I fail to see where there is any accountability for the MSM.

Perhaps -- I hope -- I am missing something?


62 posted on 09/09/2004 2:01:29 PM PDT by mwl1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: SuperSonic
On Kerry's boat / forged documents ...

They were commonly interchangeable back in those days.

Kerry threw his forged boat over a document in the manner of Jengjis Caan (1st cousin to James, founder of the Frahnsh film festival, now patronized by Redford and Streisand) and recieved three puple hearts.

Did you know John Kerry was in Viet Nam ?

63 posted on 09/09/2004 2:02:08 PM PDT by knarf (A place where anyone can learn anything ... especially that which promotes clear thinking.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: nyconse

Hannity just took a call, where they discussed the details about nonexistant fonts in the 70's. And the topic continues...

This could be a "slam dunk" on Kerry RATHER than a effective campaign smear.

This should inspire someone to open a website domain name Kerry_Rather_Lies@CBS.com, DanRatherPartisan@CBS.com or something like that.

BTW - Hannity also announced that FReepers are great. Kudos to FReepers for getting this story going.

FReeper pride!


64 posted on 09/09/2004 2:10:52 PM PDT by American Sovereignty Defender (I'm voting FOR Bush - before voting AGAINST Kerry)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: mwl1
I hope so too. If and when this reaches critcal mess, they will be forced to admit it. They will say that they were fooled because the source is so reliable, but they will refuse to name the source.

I hope they will at least be forced to out their document expert who claimed the docs were genuine.

65 posted on 09/09/2004 2:11:22 PM PDT by savedbygrace
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: nyconse

Good I sent him every thread on the subject from Free Republic before his show started. I had to take my kids to soccer so I missed the show.

Kimmer is a great guy. Former Marine who hates Kerry.


66 posted on 09/09/2004 2:13:23 PM PDT by Republican Red (We're going to win one for the gipper...they're going to lose one for the flipper)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mwl1

The MSM will have to deal with the new media growing stronger because MSM keeps stumbling from its liberal bias.

This story could help us rename Kerry's middle name. From John Forbes Kerry to John Forged Kerry.


67 posted on 09/09/2004 2:19:23 PM PDT by American Sovereignty Defender (I'm voting FOR Bush - before voting AGAINST Kerry)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: reed13
RE: #43

It would have been a 71Lima, propably E7 or lower...

Regards,
Raven6

68 posted on 09/09/2004 2:21:05 PM PDT by Raven6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: BunnySlippers

Isn't kimmer the name on the document in question???


69 posted on 09/09/2004 2:21:11 PM PDT by mware
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: drb9
"Here's a theory" ...

Yep. My theory too. There's nothing in these that contradicts Bush. The writer died in 1894 but it looks like these were created on a PC c.1980

I think they were transcribed from memory or contemporaneous notes. So, both sides may be right. The documents are not originals from 1973 but they are accurate.

They completely agree with the story that President Bush has always given.

70 posted on 09/09/2004 2:33:59 PM PDT by KingKongCobra
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: drb9

OK, but supposedly the "author" of these documents died in 1984. Maybe he did have Microsoft Word 82 on his desktop computer. I guess I'll check out the website he was working on at the time. Or perhaps Dan Rather has Killian's Blackberry with the cell phone numbers programmed in.


71 posted on 09/09/2004 2:51:14 PM PDT by boop (Testing the tagline feature!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: nyconse
The smaller local talk station's local drive-time guy was talking about this this afternoon. I guess this story has pretty well broken! Put CBS on Suicide Watch...
72 posted on 09/09/2004 3:16:53 PM PDT by atomicpossum (If there are two Americas, John Edwards isn't qualified to lead either of them.©)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KingKongCobra

Hey guys,

Hugh Hewitt is all over this. He had experts on...over 90% sure that these documents are forged. Freepers were mentioned on Hannity (thanks Howlin)...I heard that the blogs...(I hope I got this right) Powerline and INDCjournal.com are all over this...see BS stepped in it it this time. The question is who forged the documents? Carvile or Begala come to mind...Also, I heard on Hewit (caller) Killian's (guy who supposed wrote this may be mis-spelling his name) son is questioning these documents. ABC reported this... LOL We don't know how, we don't know when, but Kerry is behind this I be!


73 posted on 09/09/2004 4:56:28 PM PDT by nyconse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: atomicpossum

I just got back from cheerleading practice (daughter) and listened to the radio. Now CBS is not saying where they got these documents and apparently they may not even have originals? Yeah right...they also refuse to say who authenticated these documents if anyone did. This makes me think they came from a person See BS really trusted-perhaps a high placed Kerry operative or perhaps from Barnes himself...hm...what do you guys think?


74 posted on 09/09/2004 4:59:23 PM PDT by nyconse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: boop

The guy's son is on ABC, and he is questioning the authenticity of these documents. Where did CBS get them-inquiring minds want to know.


75 posted on 09/09/2004 5:00:35 PM PDT by nyconse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: mwl1

New media is on the way......to save the day.


76 posted on 09/09/2004 5:02:01 PM PDT by nyconse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: wildbill

My LTC typed all my official documentation cover letters/memos when I was an A1C.
For a few years,at HQ level, I thought LTCs were specially appointed due to their extraordinary typing skills.
ROTFLMAO!


77 posted on 09/09/2004 5:24:31 PM PDT by sarasmom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: kjam22
I think "wanted to get caught" is more likely. The Clintonoids have taken over Kerry's campaign. Their goal is to get PIAPS elected in 2008, the only year she'll really be able to run. If Kerry gets elected, she's shut out until 2012, when she's likely to face serious opposition from Edwards. Thus, they have to kill the Kerry candidacy without leaving their fingerprints all over the body.

What better way to do that than to play to Kerry's obvious willingness to use falsified documents to advance his career, as already documented by the Swiftvets? Then all they have to do is create crude forgeries, rather than sophisticated ones, let Kerry get caught, and leave him holding the bag. CBS was so bigoted against Bush that they bit on the bait without carefully sniffing it to see if it was poisoned.
78 posted on 09/09/2004 5:28:23 PM PDT by libstripper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: lonster

i smell a sucker punch. it seems to me that it would be political death to use false documents unless it's to get the buzz about them started on both sides of the argument, then produce the actual documents saying that an underling made an "error in judgement". this would boost the attention the whole fiasco gets wouldn't it??



They already produced the "actual documents" according to them, so where are the actual actual documents? They only have first actual documents to run with........done deal, end of actual document story. They thought that the actual documents were good enough, can you imagine the hype if they produced the actual actual documents? Not gonna happen


79 posted on 09/09/2004 7:35:19 PM PDT by Ethyl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: KingKongCobra

Yep. My theory too. There's nothing in these that contradicts Bush. The writer died in 1894 but it looks like these were created on a PC c.1980

The writer died in 1894? but it looks like there were created on a PC c.1980???????????????????? Your point is?


80 posted on 09/09/2004 7:46:28 PM PDT by Ethyl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-87 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson