Yep. My theory too. There's nothing in these that contradicts Bush. The writer died in 1894 but it looks like these were created on a PC c.1980
I think they were transcribed from memory or contemporaneous notes. So, both sides may be right. The documents are not originals from 1973 but they are accurate.
They completely agree with the story that President Bush has always given.
Hey guys,
Hugh Hewitt is all over this. He had experts on...over 90% sure that these documents are forged. Freepers were mentioned on Hannity (thanks Howlin)...I heard that the blogs...(I hope I got this right) Powerline and INDCjournal.com are all over this...see BS stepped in it it this time. The question is who forged the documents? Carvile or Begala come to mind...Also, I heard on Hewit (caller) Killian's (guy who supposed wrote this may be mis-spelling his name) son is questioning these documents. ABC reported this... LOL We don't know how, we don't know when, but Kerry is behind this I be!
Yep. My theory too. There's nothing in these that contradicts Bush. The writer died in 1894 but it looks like these were created on a PC c.1980
The writer died in 1894? but it looks like there were created on a PC c.1980???????????????????? Your point is?