Posted on 09/01/2004 9:31:02 PM PDT by Bernard Marx
JAMES REYNOLDS SCIENCE CORRESPONDENT
AMATEUR radio hams are usually excited by the faint buzz of a distant shortwave station, but a group of scientists believe they have received a message from extra-terrestrials.
Astronomers think that a signal picked up by a radio telescope last year shows the highest probability yet that ET’s family may have returned his call.
In February 2003, scientists involved in the search for extra-terrestrial intelligence (SETI) pointed the huge radio telescope in Arecibo, Puerto Rico, at about 200 sections of the sky.
Unexplained radio signals had been detected twice by the same telescope in these areas and scientists were trying to confirm the findings.
It may sound fanciful, but a report in the journal NewScientist reveals how the team has now finished analysing the data, and all the signals seem to have disappeared - except for one which has got stronger. Detected on three separate occasions, the signal is "an enigma", say researchers.
So far, explanations have included conjecture that it could be generated by a previously unknown astronomical phenomenon, or may even be something far more pedestrian, such as an artefact on the telescope itself interfering with measurements.
But the astronomy team says that it also happens to be the best candidate yet for a contact by intelligent aliens in the six-year history of the SETI@home project, which uses programmes running as screen-savers on millions of personal computers worldwide to sift through signals picked up by the Arecibo telescope.
Dr Dan Wertheimer, a radio astronomer at the University of California (Berkeley) and the chief scientist for the project, said: "It is the most interesting signal from SETI@home. We are not jumping up and down, but we are continuing to observe it."
Named SHGb02+14a, the possible alien communication has a frequency of about 1420 megahertz - one of the main frequencies at which hydrogen, the most common element in the universe, readily absorbs and emits energy.
Some astronomers have suggested that aliens trying to announce their presence would be likely to transmit at this frequency, and SETI researchers regularly scan this part of the radio spectrum.
The unexplained signal appears to be emanating from a point between the constellations of Pisces and Aries, where there is no obvious star or planetary system within 1,000 light years, and the transmission is also very faint.
Dr Eric Korpela, of the research team, said: "We are looking for something that screams out ‘artificial’. This just doesn’t do that, but it could be because it is distant."
So far, the telescope has managed to pick up the signal for only about a minute in total, which is not sufficient for astronomers to analyse it fully.
Dr Korpela believes that it is unlikely the "message" is the result of any obvious radio interference or noise, and it does not resemble any known astronomical object.
Others, however, are more sceptical, saying the current lack of explanation does not mean that it could only have been produced by aliens.
Dr Jocelyn Bell Burnell, of the University of Bath, said: "It may be a natural phenomenon of a previously undreamed-of kind - like I stumbled over."
It was Dr Bell Burnell who, in 1967, observed a pulsed radio signal which the research team at the time believed was from extra-terrestrials, but which later was confirmed as the first sighting ever of a spinning collapsed star.
Other questions arise over the signal’s frequency, which oscillates by between eight and 37 hertz a second.
Paul Horowitz, a Harvard University astronomer who looks for alien signals using optical telescopes, believes that the drift in the signal makes it "fishy".
David Anderson, the director of the SETI@home project, is also sceptical but curious about the signal. He told NewScientist: "It is unlikely to be real, but we will definitely continue to observe it."
Meanwhile, a new analysis of interstellar communications claims that, rather than sending radio signals, aliens would find it far more efficient to send a "message in a bottle".
Scientists at Rutgers University in New Jersey claim that beaming a radio signal that can be detected 10,000 light years away would demand a million billion times as much energy as just shooting out matter on which the data is inscribed.
This article:
http://news.scotsman.com/scitech.cfm?id=1028302004
Space science:
http://news.scotsman.com/topics.cfm?tid=6
Websites:
European Space Agency http://www.esa.int/export/esaCP/index.html
NASA http://www.nasa.gov
China National Space Administration http://www.cnsa.gov.cn/main_e.asp
British Astronomical Association http://www.britastro.org
Thanx. I saw the story on Drudge but I couldn't get the link to work.
interesting
> I searched and couldn't find this posted previously
Mysterious signals from 1000 light years away
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/1205081/posts
Ironically, if aliens are coming here... I think we should be building up our arsenal.
Who says aliens have to be peaceful? Hmmm... same people running around supporting terrorists. I question their judgment.
LOL, now wouldn't that be a kick?
Pulsar. Better scientists than these have been fooled by them before.
Different headline content -- but "signals" was in my search with no result.
In their world, the sky is not blue.
If there are aliens, I am guessing they are not at all peaceful. But they would figure our culture out, come dressed as ET, and then rip our hearts when we let our guard down. Talk about illegal aliens.
This sounds really silly,
>>>.AMATEUR radio hams are usually excited by the faint buzz of a distant shortwave station, but a group of scientists believe they have received a message from extra-terrestrials. <<<<
But in light of current events in NJ...I'm wondering if their is some grants or such being sought. Especially since I see the scotsman as the main carrier of this article.
>>>Scientists at Rutgers University in New Jersey claim that beaming a radio signal that can be detected 10,000 light years away would demand a million billion times as much energy as just shooting out matter on which the data is inscribed. <<<<<
You are probably already aware of this?
I'm hoping it's not for real, myself.
ping
The site was slashdotted (piled on by the innumerable readers of the techie blog slashdot.org). This happens whenever a site is mentioned on that blog.
This is rather important information, even if it does prove to be false.
> Different headline content -- but "signals" was
> in my search with no result.
Yep. I could only find it by browsing my pings, since
I had responded to it.
This site would have dramatically fewer duplicates if it
had local full-text search, accessible from the browse
page search dialog.
You can do full-text using external search engines,
and restricting them to this domain, but they don't
index often enough to be valuable to basenote posters.
And I, for one, welcome our new insect overlords.
The bable prohibits this.
I never understood why in the world they think someone would use 1420mhz.
It's like you and I agreeing to get into a giant tub full of pumpkins, and by the way, I'll signal you using this cool orange light I got.
You want to use a frequency that has few natural generators, and one that can travel long distances without getting absorbed.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.