Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

OUTRAGE: NBC WHITEWASHES BERGER'S THIEVERY (contact Today@NBC.com)

Posted on 07/20/2004 4:59:53 AM PDT by Liz

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-118 last
To: JLAGRAYFOX
The media knows you are ticked off. They don't care. Why? They know that they must win this election, above all else! If Kerry and the Democrats are defeated by GW Bush, liberals will suffer a terrible blow for years to come.

I'm afraid you're right about this. Sad to say.

101 posted on 07/20/2004 10:20:31 AM PDT by NavySEAL F-16 ("proud to be a Reagan Republican")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: combat_boots; Howlin; Fracas; nutmeg; doug from upland; onyx; Miss Marple; All

When nabbed stuffing top-secret material down his pants and socks to spirit them out of the National Archives, Berger was in the process of testifying before the 911 Commission about the extent of his and the Clinton administration's efforts (or lack thereof) to brief the incoming Bush administration about security issues which led to the 9/11 WTC and Pentagon bombings.


Samuel R. "Sandy" Berger was National Security Advisor to President Clinton beginning December 6, 1996. Berger was born on October 28, 1945 in Brooklyn, New York. His father eager to leave the city moved the family to Millerton, New York.

Berger graduated from Cornell University and Harvard Law School. After law school, he became speechwriter for George McGovern’s 1972 presidential campaign where he met the future President Bill Clinton.

When Jimmy Carter won the Presidency in 1976 Berger served as deputy director of policy planning at the State Department under Anthony Lake the man he would replace as national security advisor.

Then, Berger worked in the foreign policy section of Michael Dukakis’ 1988 presidential campaign where his boss at that job was Madeline Albright. Albright would later be appointed secretary of state at the same time Berger would be appointed national security advisor.

Berger was a partner for the Washington law firm of Hogan and Hartson from 1981-1992. Berger and his wife Susan have three children, Deborah, Sarah and Alexander.

The goals and purpose of the national security team which Berger is a part of, is to address both long and short term global policy making and keep the president up to date on all issues involving world problems. Berger said in an early interview, "I think what I have learned is that our job here is to both try to make sure that the President gets the best, sharpest information possible so he can make well informed decisions." Berger’s job more specifically is to be an essential foreign policy guide and traffic cop for the president, coordinating communication between the Oval Office and Cabinet members. Another aspect of his job is to inform the American people what the objectives of the White House are as far as foreign policy goes, especially in the Middle East." I think that American foreign policy has to make sense to the American people, and I think that means it has to be communicated to them well," says Berger.


Berger as a very close friend of President Clinton is often asked to do more than most National Security Advisors of the past. For instance, his office approached then-CNN Washington bureau chief Frank Sesno to arrange the time and location of a "town meeting."

Berger has no enemies in his position except certain members of the Republican party that do not agree with anything about a Clinton-run White House.


Berger is quick witted, blunt, and hard hitting when it comes to defending his views, yet he never hits below the belt. He has been criticized by some for being too passive which nevertheless mirrors Berger’s personality and politics: studied centrism, between aggression and indifference. " I’ve always said containment is aesthetically displeasing but strategically sufficient," erger stated. "You wake up in the morning and [Saddam Hussein] is still there and it would be far preferable than if he weren’t. As for getting Saddam.’ Most Americans would recognize that option would be emotionally gratifying, but the costs of it would be greater than our national interest."

Sources

www.whitehouse.gov/wh/eop/html
Los Angeles Times December 6,1996 page 20
The Washington Post February 24,1998
The New York Times December 6, 1996 page 8



102 posted on 07/20/2004 11:08:40 AM PDT by Liz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: defenderSD

Love that mental pic. LOL.


103 posted on 07/20/2004 11:10:49 AM PDT by Liz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: Liz

Berger is squarely in the democrat camp.
IOW's he's a liar and the "sought after
end result ALWAYS justifies the means."


104 posted on 07/20/2004 11:13:11 AM PDT by onyx (Kerry/Edwards: It's the hair, stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]

To: Liz

Yeah, I think some cream pie would really perk up the perky one.


105 posted on 07/20/2004 11:28:02 AM PDT by defenderSD (The number of people who lie about space aliens for $ far exceeds the number of aliens on earth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: combat_boots

Hello, maybe the LSM has an agenda. Hmmmm? This country needs a HUGE wake up call. It seems that 9/11 was a "stub of the toe".

Do you see a huge split in this country yet??? You should for it is obvious!!!


106 posted on 07/20/2004 11:31:18 AM PDT by gathersnomoss
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: onyx; MeekOneGOP

The thing that stands out is that he worked in the losing Dukakis campaign.

I just can't stop thinking of Sandy in the tank with a helmet. LOL.

Somebody oughta photoshop it. Would be hilarious.


107 posted on 07/20/2004 11:35:50 AM PDT by Liz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]

To: Stillwaters
This story needs close and careful monitoring via alternative news sources such as Free Republic.

Remember, "When nabbed stuffing top-secret material down his pants and socks to spirit them out of the National Archives, Berger was in the process of testifying before the 911 Commission about the extent of his and the Clinton administration's efforts (or lack thereof) to brief the incoming Bush administration about security issues which led to the 9/11 WTC and Pentagon bombings."

The mainstream news and DNC are trying to spin this as "inadvertent" and "a blunder". They're trying to cover up this devastating revelation by blaming the White House for leaking the FBI investigation. Stay tuned.

108 posted on 07/20/2004 11:37:14 AM PDT by lonevoice (Some things have to be believed to be seen)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Liz; MeekOneGOP; PhilDragoo


Please see Liz's #107.
Berger in the tank ala Dukakis?


109 posted on 07/20/2004 11:43:55 AM PDT by onyx (Kerry/Edwards: It's the hair, stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies]

To: onyx

Thanks.......this'll be a riot.


110 posted on 07/20/2004 11:57:27 AM PDT by Liz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies]

Comment #111 Removed by Moderator

To: Liz

No, go right ahead and write, e-mail, call, etc. I e-mail Chris Matthews all the time. I warned him about that liberal butt kissing Howard (Never gets it right!) Fineman, I told him that both Richard Clarke and Joe Wilson were liars, I told him the "Summer of Bill Clinton" would really turn out to be the "Week of Bill Clinton", which it was! I also told him that at the end of the day he was going to look like a fool. He never learns though and his ratings stay down in the gutter where they rightfully belong! Seriously, I really believe that enough American voters get it, and that GW Bush will be re-elected by a strong margin. My prediction, which I have been touting for at least four months is: GW Bush=57%, John Kerry=40%, Ralph Nader=3%. Election day will tell the tale!


112 posted on 07/20/2004 12:54:53 PM PDT by JLAGRAYFOX
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies]

To: Liz; All

Liz and everybody,
Don't forget an e-mail to Greta Van Susternan at Fox's On The Record. She LOVES to use David Gergen as her politically neutral "go to guy".
What a joke! The guy always tips his hand as a big Lib (of course, otherwise why would Greta have him on?)


113 posted on 07/20/2004 1:00:09 PM PDT by krunkygirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Yehuda; Liz
JC Penny sponsors couric an TODAY?

Yes, JC Penney's and the following as well: Johnson & Johnson, Pillsbury, and Wyeth

114 posted on 07/20/2004 1:57:10 PM PDT by eleni121 (John Ashcroft: on the job and doing a great one!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies]

To: combat_boots

The New York Times: (212) 556-7652
The New York Post: (212) 930-8000

ABC: 212-456-7777
CBS: 212-975-4321
NBC: 212-664-4444
CNN: 404-237-0234
Fox:1-888-369-4762
NY York Daily News (212) 210-NEWS

Bill O'Reily
E-mail: oreilly@foxnews.com

Sean Hannity
hannity@foxnews.com

Alan Colmes
colmes@foxnews.com

Phylis Schlafly
eagle@eagleforum.org

Oliver North
http://www.northamerican.com/-cybercall/pg-call.htm

Janet Parshall, conservative talk show host
(703) 276-8597
Fax: (703) 516-7212
E-Mail us at: info@jpamerica.com

Brit Hume
Special Report with Brit Hume
Special@foxnews.com

Hugh Hewitt (conservative talk show host/columnist)
http://www.hughhewitt.com/

Michael Medved (conservative talk show host/columnist)
http://www.michaelmedved.com/contact.shtml

I got these addresses from Media Research Center,

http://www.mediaresearch.org/MediaAddresses/mediaaddresses.asp#If%20the

Atlanta Journal-Constitution
e-mail: conedit@ajc.com

Houston Chronicle
e-mail: viewpoints@chron.com

Miami Herald
e-mail: HeraldEd@herald.com

The New York Times
letters@nytimes.com

Pittsburgh Post-Gazette
e-mail: letters@post-gazette.com

USA Today
e-mail: editor@usatoday.com

The Wall Street Journal
e-mail: letter.editor@edit.wsj.com

The Washington Post
e-mail: Letterstoed@washpost.com

The Washington Times
e-mail: wtnews@wt.infi.net


115 posted on 07/20/2004 2:00:48 PM PDT by votelife (Calling abortion a women's issue is like calling war a men's issue!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

Comment #116 Removed by Moderator

To: nutmeg

bttt and thanks!


117 posted on 07/21/2004 3:31:44 AM PDT by lainde (Heads up...We're coming and we've got tongue blades!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]

To: Liz; onyx
Yesterday, Rush referred to it as "TrouserGate".

TrouserGate bump !


118 posted on 07/21/2004 6:36:25 AM PDT by MeekOneGOP (There is only one GOOD 'RAT: one that has been voted OUT of POWER !! Straight ticket GOP!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-118 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson