Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

John Kerry Statement on Federal Marriage Amendment
USNewswire.com ^ | July 14 2004 | no byline

Posted on 07/14/2004 1:43:58 PM PDT by weegee

To: National Desk and Political Reporter

Contact: Allison Dobson of Kerry-Edwards, 202-464-2800, Web: http://www.johnkerry.com

BOSTON, July 14 /U.S. Newswire/ -- Senator John Kerry released the following statement today:

"The floor of the United States Senate should only be used for the common good, not issues designed to divide us for political purposes. Throughout history, amending our Constitution -- the foundation of the nation's values and ideals -- has been serious business. However, even Republicans concede that this amendment is being offered only for political gains. The unfortunate result is that the important work of the American people -- funding our homeland security needs, creating new and better jobs, and raising the minimum wage -- is not getting done. Had this amendment reached a final vote, I would have voted against it, because I believe that the American people deserve better than this from their leaders. When I am president, I will work to bring the nation together and build a stronger America."


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Massachusetts
KEYWORDS: 2004election; 2004electionbias; activistjudges; adoption; awol; awolonmarriage; constitution; defenseofmarriageact; doma; election2004; flipflop; fma; fosterchildren; goodvsevil; homosexualagenda; johnkerry; judicialactivism; kerry; kerrycampaign; mediabias; missedthevote; rightvswrong; romans1; samesexmarriage; truthvslies; whereisjohn
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-56 next last
FYI: only John Kerry and John Edwards declined to vote.

Had this amendment reached a final vote, I would have voted against it, because I believe that the American people deserve better than this from their leaders.

Translation: "I didn't vote before I didn't vote for it."

1 posted on 07/14/2004 1:43:58 PM PDT by weegee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: weegee

Marriage is not important to the future of this country. Of course knowing this ticket, they will deny that's what they meant even as they reassure the gay lobby they're all for gay marriage with a wink and a nod.


2 posted on 07/14/2004 1:45:50 PM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: weegee
Link to thread with John Edwards' press release:

Edwards Statement on Federal Marriage Amendment

3 posted on 07/14/2004 1:47:04 PM PDT by weegee (Government does not solve problems; it subsidizes them. ~~Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: weegee
"When I am president, I will work to bring the nation together and build a stronger America."

John Kerry:

You will not be President.

4 posted on 07/14/2004 1:47:50 PM PDT by jveritas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: weegee

"I voted for the amendment before I voted against it".


5 posted on 07/14/2004 1:48:01 PM PDT by Numbers Guy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: weegee

Edwards: "If this amendment had reached a final vote, I would have voted against it because it is wrong to govern that way."

Translation: "I didn't vote before I didn't vote for it."


6 posted on 07/14/2004 1:48:16 PM PDT by weegee (Government does not solve problems; it subsidizes them. ~~Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: weegee
However, even Republicans concede that this amendment is being offered only for political gains.

Who??? This isn't the same as the "foreign leaders endorse me" statement, is it? Your own home state, Mr. Kerry, is the one forcing the issue on this and when the DOM act is overturned by an activist court, what then? Will the State of Florida have the right not to accept the desires of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts? No, of course not. This IS a Federal issue given Article IV, Section 1 of the Constitution and YOU KNOW IT. To say otherwise is playing politics.

7 posted on 07/14/2004 1:50:08 PM PDT by NonValueAdded ("We're going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good" HRC 6/28/2004)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: weegee

Great opening for us. Both candidates are AWOL from their job, don't show up to vote and then wish to lecture the rest of us about working.

It's time for the Bush team and RNC to not just release a typical soft response but blast them with specific details on their truancy, ask for their resignation from the Senate, and use terms like unqualified, incompetent and irrational.


8 posted on 07/14/2004 1:50:11 PM PDT by plain talk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: plain talk

... and one more important detail - issue the statement while laughing about the ridiculousness of this.


9 posted on 07/14/2004 1:51:30 PM PDT by plain talk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: weegee
"...the important work of the American people..."

"Bull" Clinton used this phrase a lot.

10 posted on 07/14/2004 1:51:36 PM PDT by weegee (Government does not solve problems; it subsidizes them. ~~Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: weegee
Kerry is an exceptionally good BS artist. Says he'd vote against it, but for some obscure political reasons, never addressing the substance of the amendment. So he is supposedly against gay marriage and against preventing gay marriage. Similar to his abortion subterfuge. He's against it but will do everything to preserve it.

Translation: A phoney liberal who is solidly for both gay marriage and abortion without limits.

11 posted on 07/14/2004 1:53:23 PM PDT by Williams
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: NonValueAdded
Meanwhile in Washington:

House Judiciary Committee Approves State Marriage Protection Legislation

12 posted on 07/14/2004 1:53:33 PM PDT by weegee (Government does not solve problems; it subsidizes them. ~~Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: weegee

He lists every other issue which has nothing to do with gay marriage. How about showing up and voting on the merits of each bill. He is a Senator so some of us would find that to be in his job description. How is it wrong to bring up an issue in the senate and vote on it, whether for or against?


13 posted on 07/14/2004 1:55:58 PM PDT by Williams
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Williams

It is interesting that Kerry-Edwards are trying to motivate young people to vote ("Does my vote really matter?") and here they are the only two who didn't vote.


14 posted on 07/14/2004 1:56:01 PM PDT by weegee (Government does not solve problems; it subsidizes them. ~~Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop
"They're tired, soaking wet — and beaming with pride. Anything to help their dad, Democratic Sen. John F. Kerry, become the next president of the United States. Alexandra, 30, and Vanessa, 27, are the first-daughters-in-waiting..." http://www.usatoday.com/life/people/2004-07-14-kerry-daughters_x.htm
15 posted on 07/14/2004 1:56:03 PM PDT by traumer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: weegee
He said : "The floor of the United States Senate should . . . " Bbbbbbzzzzzzzzzzz hold it right there, kucking ferry.

In order to comment on the events of the senate you first have to SHOW UP !

16 posted on 07/14/2004 1:58:37 PM PDT by ChadGore (Vote Bush. He's Earned It.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: weegee

John Kerry supports filth. End o' story.


17 posted on 07/14/2004 2:01:10 PM PDT by KC_Conspirator (This space outsourced to India)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: weegee

"...this amendment is being offered only for political gains."

O.K. WAIT A MINUTE HERE. I'VE HEARD THIS "ONLY FOR POLITICAL GAIN" STUFF ENOUGH. THE ONES WHO WILL GAIN FROM THIS POLITICALLY ARE THE ONES IN THE MAJORITY. DOES MR. KERRY AND THOSE WHO KEEP SAYING THAT THIS IS "ELECTION YEAR POLITICS" NOT WANT THE CONGRESS & SENATE OF THE U.S. TO REFLECT THE VIEWS OF THE MAJORITY OF AMERICANS; OR JUST A SELECT FEW "SPECIAL INTEREST GROUPS" AND POLITICIANS?


18 posted on 07/14/2004 2:01:35 PM PDT by no dems (I obey whatever the voices in my wife's head tell me to do.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: weegee

Hmmm ... too busy for briefings or votes ...

"The Edwards campaign trip -- on a day off for Kerry -- "

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A49935-2004Jul14.html


19 posted on 07/14/2004 2:03:09 PM PDT by maggief
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: weegee

I don't understand. Why would anyone post what Kerry or Edwards has to say about anything?


20 posted on 07/14/2004 2:04:27 PM PDT by Warren (Orhe)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-56 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson