Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

White Nationalist Group Targets Free Republic For Infiltration
Stormfront White Nationalist Community | http://www.stormfront.org/forum/showthread.php?t=136664 | Multiple posters

Posted on 07/01/2004 4:11:35 PM PDT by stands2reason

Edited on 07/01/2004 4:41:08 PM PDT by Admin Moderator. [history]

Warning! Clicking on the links on this thread may cause spyware to be installed on your computer

On A Stormfront Teaching Incursion Into Free Republic ------------------------------------------------------------------------

Svyatoslav_Igorevich has taken a keen interest in inducing Stormfront members to register at Free Republic. Free Republic is approximately five times as large as Stormfront.

"How do we penetrate Free Republic?"

http://www.stormfront.org/forum/showthread.php?t=136636

Over the past few years, Free Republic has gotten less and less interesting. However, many posters and readers at Free Republic are four square behind stopping the illegal invasion from Mexico. This is one topic on which you will be allowed to post at Free Republic.

Free Republic does not suffer criticism of Jewry, so- if you insist on trying to get that topic in, you'll be banned in short order. That is certain.

They will allow minority crime stories, but don't try and headline it "Negro Rapes and Kills White College Girl" etc., cause you'll be history.

I believe you have to be a member for a very brief while- a few days or a week, before you can start your own threads, but you can post from the start.

A few ideas I have on registration names: perhaps it would be wise to use names they can relate to easily...GOPin04, WtheBEST, ConservativeGirl (take up a girl's name as a handle- most politicos are men, and they'll appreciate it LOL), GodBlessUSA, SupportOurBoysInIraq etc. And don't use my examples, cause for certain, Jim Robinson and his mods will soon find out about and read this thread.

Remember. What we consider staid, they consider radical racist. If you find a good minority on White current crime tale- toss it right in there. Then, for good measure- just to show you're not racist (cause some of them will say- "You ONLY ever post black on White crime!")...well, post some White homo principal who's been playing with his students. A digital incursion onto Free Republic can be managed. We have the numbers, and the abilities. But a lot of us will get knocked out as surely as if we had been British redcoats charging in a line, if we don't be sensible and clever.

Remember these pointers before you click that mouse. And ask yourself: "Would Jim Robinson post this?"

If we meet with some successes, we can't come back to Stormfront and say- "I am posting over at Free Republic as "RightWingChick" and here's what I said...", cause their mods will be following our threads having to do with the incursion. We could post threads in which we've participated and let everyone at Free Republic and Stormfront guess, but we simply can't name our names and expect to go undetected. Jim Robinosn will even be looking for increases in registrations, and all those who have registered within 30 days or so of Svyatoslav_Igorevich's http://www.stormfront.org/forum/showthread.php?t=136636 JJT's http://www.stormfront.org/forum/showthread.php?t=136655 and this Free Republic thread.


TOPICS: Announcements; Culture/Society; Free Republic; Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS: bigorty; bigots; candidatesforzot; christianidentity; crossburning; cyclopsgoons; fascism; fascist; fascisti; fascistic; fascistregime; futurekittenchow; gorebots; hitlernostalgia; idiots; insectinfestation; kittiebait; kkk; losers; mouthbreathers; nazi; naziisraelhaters; nothanks; nutzis; racist; racistpigs; racistregime; ridethelightning; scary; sickos; sickwackos; skinhead; staringatthesun; stormfront; stupid; terror; ultranationalism; vikingkitties; whacko; whitenationalist; whiteterrorism; zionist; zot; zotapplicants; zotbait; zotblitzen; zottheirasses
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 981-985 next last
To: stands2reason
Great find....FR gets a couple of these kooks every few years it seems. A few members have even made it to some protests. I've found they like to insert themselves into the second amendment groups, make some allies that will later become useful when you try to boot them out.
As with everything, vigilance is vital.
61 posted on 07/01/2004 4:28:54 PM PDT by Katya (Homo Nosce Te Ipsum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: The Old Hoosier
Oooh! Quote and photo.

I'm not worthy!

62 posted on 07/01/2004 4:29:13 PM PDT by Petronski (Fairness is fiction.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: stands2reason

lol I wonder what Jesse Jackson and his GOP = confederacy would think of this. These kooks are the confederacy, not the GOP... and why do they want to infiltrate us anyway? Whats to gain?


63 posted on 07/01/2004 4:29:27 PM PDT by traviskicks (The private sector ALWAYS outperforms government)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stands2reason

Don't click the link! I did it so you don't have to.

Here's more from that thread:
jimmyjones
Free Republic long ago began banning anyone against their pro-Republican/pro immigration stance. The place is really nothing but a Rah Rah Republican site. JimRob doesn't countenance much anti immigration talk, as I'm sure that the woman who has to wipe his ass is probably nonWhite

JimmyJones, a thrice banned member of FreeRepublic



Svyatoslav_Igorevich
I believe you have to be a member for a very brief while- a few days or a week, before you can start your own threads, but you can post from the start.

I believe you have to be a member for a very brief while- a few days or a week, before you can start your own threads, but you can post from the start.
I registered, posted a Sobran article thread, had it yanked and was banned all within an hour.

The rest of your advice is excellent.

I wish everyone who posted a link to an online poll here would follow your click through rules Chain. It helps a LOT when the poll hoster doesn't know all the votes skewing his polls come from SF. :)

DO NOT attempt to link to Stormfront, EURO, Yggdrasil, or any other WN site from Free Republic. You will be immediately banned, and believe me- people will complain against you right away. So don't even try.
Well, not if avoiding a ban is your goal, that is. I'm going to try and figure out if I can set up a new email>new FR account>post "SF recruitment form letter">get banned>start over system efficient enough to make it worthwhile.

If I can make the whole process painless, add in a decent proxy manager, and voila!

Lawdog
I feel like a guy standing up in front of an AA meeting. "Hello. My name is Lawdog and I'm a recovering Freeper." I'm still registered but haven't been there for quite some time. Being on that board was like having to listen to Sean Hannity or El Rushbo, it was a particularly painful masochistic form of self torture.

Michael Pratt
Over the past few years, Free Republic has gotten less and less interesting. However, many posters and readers at Free Republic are four square behind stopping the illegal invasion from Mexico. This is one topic on which you will be allowed to post at Free Republic.
Indeed; I've posted some H. Millard articles about immigration and I do not believe they were deleted.

No 1965 Chain Immigrants
Equipped with your handy proxyserver address, and a few throwaway email addresses, you should do just fine-
http://www.publicproxyservers.com/index.html

If anyone knows where to get downloadable programs that constantly change your address, those would be useful. If no one lays them in, I'll do the search.

Bamaman
Multiproxy does that. You can set it to how often it switches. There are several others as well but I've only used MP.

http://www.multiproxy.org/

http://www.download.com/ - should be able to find most programs you would need here as well.

Myskow
After reading Igorevich's post, I decided to register on FR. I immediately posted something like this:

"M: Is it true FR arbitrarily deletes threads it doesn't like?

I'd like to join in discussions, but I'm a little nervous. I've heard things like FR just deletes posts it doesn't like, or from people it that aren't conservative.
Is this true?"




Would this get me banned?

I think it's a great idea for us to engage en masse with opposing websites.

Fenris8814
"enter from a Stormfront-opened browser with a cut and paste URL. You will be found out and terminated! DO NOT attempt to link to Stormfront, EURO, Yggdrasil, or any other WN site from Free Republic. You will be immediately banned, and believe me- people will complain against you right away. So don't even try."

Chain my friend, I respect you but don't see how such how such an incursion would do us any good. Your above statement shows how unwilling these republiCON scum are to be on ourside. History was built by the few elite, not by the masses.

88!

Coldstar
I believe that the people who are drawn to Free Republic will either love it there or get fed up and search for other Message Boards. Eventually they will find "Stormfront" on their own.

Wolfsnarl
I don't think they track IPs there. If they did, we wouldn't be able to get back on with just a new email address.

My experiences on FreeRepublic:

1. Hear about the site on Stormfront. Go over there, look for people I think might be interested in SF, and send them private messages about this site. Quickly banned.

2. Avoid the Jewish issue and post mainly about immigration. Was a longtime member and didn't have any problems, except when I posted an article by Sam Francis that had the word 'neo-con' in it, the thread went up to 200+ posts, mostly dumb ones, in a couple hours before being yanked. Got along fine for a while after that, eventually banned along with someone else when he uses the word 'sand-nigger' in a reply to a post I made in support of Le Pen.

3. Post about 3 articles about Islamic extremism, banned for some really retarded reason. After this I gave up on the site.

Myskow
Here (http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1149530/posts) is the first thread I have started on FR. I was hoping it would get deleted. It would have been the sweetest irony :)

(You'll understand if you check it out).

I'm not sure if these people are SF material. Either way, I'm in. SF Central Command, please advise, over. :soldierfn



(EDIT)

Your posting privilege has been revoked.

Reason:
troll

:rofl

1 post is all it took.

JohnJoyTree
From Loki with horns


This isn't for your benefit per se, as I'm sure you know most of it already.

Just thought I'd give my 2 cents; maybe you or someone else will find some of it handy. Maybe you could pass it on, if you're inclined to?

The FIRST thing to do is to find the smartest, least demagogic posters there: those who generally judge things on a case-by-case basis, and whose opinion influences others.

This is important: by initiating dialogues with popular posters, you'll ensure that a larger and wider range of people see your posts. Also, when THEY agree with you on something, a greater number of people there will be inclined to also do so.

At first, concentrate on initiating dialogue with them. On issues that both parties are concerned with: with FR, it'd be religion, immigration, economic rationalism, stuff like that. If you must discuss specifically WN issues, always do so in a way that they relate to their own concerns and pre-occupations.

There's many ways to generation mutual understanding, and it's the first and MOST IMPORTANT step in bringing a person's opinions closer to yours, in your own thinking influencing that of others.

Always post properly: spelling, punctuation, grammar and syntax, things like that. Most of the initial criticisms anyone in general will make of anyone else's postings on the Internet will be along these lines. When you do this, your posts will have greater weight in people's minds. It's like addressing large groups of people: if you mumble and look at the ground, you're not going to be convincing.

DON'T, for pity's sake, use terms and phrases that are commonly associated with WN. And DON'T make it obvious that you're coming from here. Oh, and DON'T post in a fashion that leads people to the conclusion that you're WN's... I notice that a whole lot of WN posts in hostile forums tend to run along the same ground.

Most people at FR are NOT so far removed from WN, after all, and it's not the body of your opinions for the most part but the 'buzz words', the 'key phrases', that encourage people to 'shut off' and not listen to what you're saying.

Hope y'all find this useful.
.


64 posted on 07/01/2004 4:29:32 PM PDT by stands2reason (Everyone's a self-made man -- but only the successful are willing to admit it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stands2reason

Will they sign off with "88" like the last batch of knuckledraggers who tried this?


65 posted on 07/01/2004 4:29:58 PM PDT by Leroy S. Mort
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stands2reason
Geez! Those clowns again?


66 posted on 07/01/2004 4:30:01 PM PDT by backhoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stands2reason

Stormfront:

Show yourselves and prepare to be ridiculed. (Sharpens claws on chair.)


67 posted on 07/01/2004 4:30:06 PM PDT by Not A Snowbird (You need tons click "co-ordinating")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stands2reason
What the HELL?

God damn these lunatics!

68 posted on 07/01/2004 4:30:39 PM PDT by maquiladora
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stands2reason

The criticisms of FR in the posts you've excerpted make me prouder than ever to be part of the community here.

This site enjoys a majority critical of race-based initiatives and policies in favor of race-neutral policies, yet as shown by the criticisms excerpted, the site won't tolerate racism. Thanks to the mods.

There's plenty of other locations for racist's excercise of free speech. This board is someone else's private property.


69 posted on 07/01/2004 4:31:56 PM PDT by ER_in_OC,CA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Petronski

"Your gonna look awful funny with no F***in' teeth!"


70 posted on 07/01/2004 4:32:12 PM PDT by CaptSkip
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Chad Fairbanks
Ping!

You start sharpening the knives.

I'll get the honey and locate some good anthills.

71 posted on 07/01/2004 4:32:24 PM PDT by Harmless Teddy Bear (You'll think twice about that when a 6' 250 lb Viking kitty with titanium claws comes calling.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stands2reason

I don't get their point. "Let's infiltrate, but let's not say anything they wouldn't say. Keep that fringe crap to yourself, or you'll be gone."

So, they're going to come over here and be model freepers? What do they gain? Basically, it sounds like we're at the same point we always were: let new people in, but zot them if they reveal themselves to be infiltrators. *shrug*


72 posted on 07/01/2004 4:32:31 PM PDT by Rastus (Forget it, Moby! I'm voting for Bush!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale

I knew there was a reason I just invested in a new BS detector.


73 posted on 07/01/2004 4:32:47 PM PDT by FourPeas ("To educate a man in mind and not in morals is to educate a menace to society. " T. Roosevelt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: The Old Hoosier; Warren_Piece
I hate Illinois Nazis.

Hahahaa, I love that movie! That is about the level of mentality of some of these "whitepower" groups...

74 posted on 07/01/2004 4:33:14 PM PDT by TheSpottedOwl ("In the Kingdom of the Deluded, the Most Outrageous Liar is King".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: CaptSkip

I remember the quote as "Gonna be pretty hard to eat corn on the cob with no F****n' teeth!"


75 posted on 07/01/2004 4:33:31 PM PDT by Petronski (Fairness is fiction.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson; John Robinson
I don't think they track IPs there. If they did, we wouldn't be able to get back on with just a new email address.

LOL

76 posted on 07/01/2004 4:34:23 PM PDT by Petronski (Fairness is fiction.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: stands2reason

it would make more sense for them to head over to DU


77 posted on 07/01/2004 4:34:24 PM PDT by APRPEH (supremacist thought is liberal politics)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Peach

It's not the first time. We had a group of these aholes attacking us a couple two or three years ago from the Sam Francis forum. We banned them and kept an eye out for their posting styles and checked their IP addresses when we spotted them. Half a dozen or so of these yahoos came back many times. I think we finally discouraged most of them and they drifted off to libertyforum and libertypost where they're not quite as picky as to the company they keep. We still catch one or two trying to get back in from time to time and I'm sure there are some who carefully fly just below the radar range. They eventually show their true colors and get banned.


78 posted on 07/01/2004 4:34:37 PM PDT by Jim Robinson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: stands2reason
Great find, but somehow I don't get their point. They might be DUers trying to stir things up, make false implications about FR and/or cause some paranoia or they might be ignorantwhackonazis.

Either way what's their motivation in posting here? Just so they can say they posted here? Infiltrate what? Oh wait, right! JR's ultra secret ties to... errrrh (oooops, please ignore what I just said...)

/ facetious roll of eyes

79 posted on 07/01/2004 4:34:54 PM PDT by bd476 ("Marco Polo If You Can," "Who's On First?" Just two of many great novels by WFB)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Shooter 2.5
Actually one kook who posted for a very short time on FR, started on some left wing boards. Those folks also got rid of him in short order, so they set their sites on the right wing boards.
In some sense they live in no-mans land, proposing a smorgasbord of unaffiliated principles, so one finds that they identify with both sides of the political spectrum. You'll find they're pro-social engineering and anti-capitalist, while being both pro-2nd amendment and pro-separation of powers.
80 posted on 07/01/2004 4:35:01 PM PDT by Katya (Homo Nosce Te Ipsum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 981-985 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson