It is interesting that out of all of the Americans available to be interviewed by Michael Moore that Nick Berg was interviewed by Moore last December:
Hopefuly a door will open now.....Nick Berg was NOT as he was portrayed,
Moore is an opportunist and a media wh)re...I'm sure this is another lie of his.
What is a crack-vial ring?
Curioser and curioser; but at least anything that Moorey the Hutt says is a lie, that's one thing we can be sure of.
This would suggest that the estemed Michael Moore (Palm d'Or, doncha know) might be lying, a suggestion I could never seriously entertain!!
Huh? The first I heard of this. What evidence? Who are they saying did it?
I don't know if you picked this one up yet.
I don't believe anything MM puts out there. He is just trying to hype his stupied documentary. I hope terrorists kill him.
Last sentence may be new information.
"The initial story that touched off the controversy appeared Thursday on the online magazine Salon.com."
I seriously believe Michael Moore is nothing more than a habitual liar who has succeeded in garning attention to himself by using sensationalistic fabrications. Hey look, it's worked so far. If people would "ignore" him he'd go away like a deflating blimp in a wind storm. The MOORE you feed the pig the more gluttonous he becomes.
This raises all sorts of conspiracy theories (variations of it have been posted)
However, I am wondering if he was interviewed because of his connection with Moussawi, who had his email address...and the interview was about the Patriot act or the Bush administration questioning "innocent" civilians with ties to terrorism...
Thanks for posting this, I was wondering if the interview story was just rumor. Now I know it's not. And, as has been said before about this whole situation, curiouser and curiouser.
From the article: Moore's terse statement said[:] "It was approximately 20 minutes long. We are not releasing it to the media. It is not in the film. We are dealing privately with the family."
OK, I can understand why they wouldn't release it to the media, who probably wouldn't play it anyway unless it was filled with invective against Bush, which I guess it isn't or it would have made the final cut for the movie. But, don't they have an obligation to share this with law enforcement? Remember the advice of a million murder mysteries: the way to solve a murder is to examine the victim's life. If I were investigating Berg's death, I'd want to talk to Mr. Moore, and see his interview footage ASAP.
From Berg's father, of course.
Move-on.org, ANSWER, the DNC...they all are part of an orchestrated anti-America crusade. I don't believe in any coincidences at this point.
Sara Berg said she did not think it odd that her brother would be interviewed for an anti-Bush documentary. "I'm sure Mr. Moore talked to people with all kinds of different opinions," she said.
Now, what grabs my attention is the interview was done, before Nick went to Bagdad. How did MM find out Nick was going to Iraq?
I am now considering that daddy used Nick in Iraq to pass messages without Nick being aware of his role.
Pray for W and Our Troops
It is interesting that out of all of the Americans available to be interviewed by Michael Moore that Nick Berg was interviewed by Moore last December:
Add this one to the list . . .
Moore won't release it because it gives lie to the fathers contention that the son was pro Bush.
The son was a subversive agent, like the father, and Moore, another subversive, is going to have to give up the tape as part of the murder investigation.
If he refuses, they will throw his fat commie ass in jail.
Well that's sure an interesting statement! What evidence is this writer talking about?